LBReport.com

Opinion / Common Sense

Second in a Special Series: Civic Center: "A Once in a Lifetime Opportunity" OR "Just Another Stupid And Expensive Idea"?

by Terry Jensen


(October 9, 2014) -- Can the City get a brand new "earthquake proof" City Hall building that costs taxpayers only what they're currently paying to operate and manage the Civic Center and the old "ready to collapse" building?

NOPE! It can't, and those claiming otherwise know or should know it!

City staff tells the Council and taxpayers: "A requirement of the project is that it will cost the City no more than the current $12.6 million on an annual basis, including an annual inflation index. So there will be no additional expense beyond the currently budgeted expense. As a result, there should be no additional financial burden on the residents of Long Beach."

BALONEY! This constraint isn't achievable and they know or should know it!

So, what's in the $12.6 Million sum that staff has told Councilmembers and taxpayers will pay for a new building, and how much does the city really have to pay for a new building?

There is a $31 Million debt -- with payments of $2.6 Million -- made in 2010 to refinance a previous 1973 LB Civic Center Revenue Bond used to "assist in the financing of a police headquarters facility, an emergency services system center and improvements to the LB Civic Center..." The City entered into a Facilities Lease dated 12/1/97 to facilitate the refinancing.

  • So, it seems a substantial portion of the bond actually paid for things other than the Civic Center Building and is NOT operating cost!

  • It is also DEBT, not EQUITY, and payments cannot buy anything.

  • The $2.6 Million annual payments go to the Bank and aren't available to pay for anything else for the next 13 years (until 2027).

  • As things currently stand, after 2027 the City will have paid off the debt and will have $2.6 Million annually to use as it pleases. It could even save it or perhaps hire a dozen police officers

  • However, if the P3 Developer and City defease the Bond so they can demolish City Hall, the City will end up making payments to the Developer, giving the Developer $2.6 Million for 27 yrs.

  • AND if the City does what staff recommends, instead of paying off the bond in 13 years and having free use of the money in year 14, LB taxpayers will instead be obligated to continue making the same payment for 40 years. Some deal eh!

*Take $2.6 Million off the $12.6 Million and you now have $10 Million*

City staff originally said they "want to get rid of costly property leases for off-site employees" and "remain cost neutral." Exhibit A in the RFP list "CANDIDATES" for relocation "cost $2.13 Million for 112,000 sf of leased space plus parking cost."

  • Oh Really! Unfortunately there are a few problems with what staff SAYS compared to what they SHOULD do.

  • The RFP indicates only 90,000 square feet of relocated departments will be in the new civic center project NOT 112,000 s.f. If so, take off $430,000 of "savings."

  • The average cost of the remaining "candidate" leases is only $1.59 s.f. and the largest lease (26,100 s.f.) only pays $.50 s.f..

  • So, why would the City want to relocate the departments that serve the neighborhoods in which they're located at low lease rates into a new building that will cost substantially more?

  • A new Class A building will cost upwards of $600 s.f. (see June 21, 2011 Study Session) Therefore the cost of building 90,000 square feet to house the "candidate leases" will cost $50 to $60 Million without land cost. The $1.7 Million in current lease payments will not even pay for debt service on such a building.

  • So, what should a fiscally prudent City do? Leave the "candidate" leases where they are at low lease rates and build a smaller building and save $50 to $60 Million in construction cost and the resulting extra lease costs.

*So, take $2.3 Million off the $10 Million and you get $7.7 Million*

City staff claims it costs taxpayers $7.8 Million per annum to operate and manage the Civic Center Building, Lincoln Park and the Library.

  • NOPE ONCE AGAIN! The NET expenses for the City Hall, Library, Parking Garages and Lincoln Park are approximately $6.7 Million per annum.

  • The City included an off-site lease and expenses for "Veterans" on Pine Ave. totaling $126,846 and $625,000 for Capital Improvements that may be non reoccurring

  • The City includes a cost of 12 FTEs for building engineering that totals $1,413,415 or $117,784 per FTE. That seems excessive.

  • DLBA PBID Assessments of $404,906 are also included

  • Remove the puffery re engineering staff, janitorial, police MOU and other operational expenses and I would suggest reducing the expense by another 1 Million.

*Take out $1.2 Million from the $7.7 and you get $6.5 Million.

Therefore, based on the City's published information, the City can only show, at best, $8.8 Million in continuing expense which is far short of the $12.6 million city staff claims it costs now for City Hall.

And when one deducts the "candidate leases" and leaves them where they belong, the continuing expense drops to $6.5 Million per annum.

And the puffery doesn't stop here!

How in the world is a P3 Developer going to finance and construct a new 300,000 square foot "earthquake proof" building for the City and a NEW Library with only $6.5 Million if you use my numbers or $12.6 Million if you use the City's puffed up number?




Click for VIDEO and see how Diversified Threat Management private security can help protect your neighborhood and your business. Affordable group rates available.












HOT!!...but is your air conditioner running properly, most efficiently? Call LB-based Charlie McGrail and stay cool!














Carter Wood Floors
Hardwood Floor Specialists
Call (562) 422-2800 or (714) 836-7050




Return To Front Page

Contact us: mail@LBReport.com


Copyright © 2014 LBReport.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use/Legal policy, click here. Privacy Policy, click here