LBReport.com

Editorial

Transparency and Taxpayers First: Release the Proposed Consultant Contract Before It Commits City To Millions For Downtown Taj Mahal



(December 2, 2013, 8:00 p.m.) -- This morning (Monday, Dec. 2), LBREPORT.com requested a copy of city management's proposed contract -- scheduled for voted approval by the City Council on Dec. 3 -- that could spend up to $3.25 million to hire a consultant group to prepare the Request for Proposals to which three development groups will respond in competing to build and charge the City to operate a new Civic Center.

We did so to try and report some journalistic basics of this story, including salient portions of its "who" and "what" components.

With less than twenty-four hours remaining before the Council vote, neither the press nor public know the most basic elements of the proposed deal:

  • (1) Who comprises the local consultant group assembled to prepare the Request for Proposals? What are their names? Do they include campaign contributors, the "usual suspects," cronies of officials?

  • (2) Who decides -- the elected Council publicly or non-elected management privately -- whether to exercise two annual options that make the contract a three-year deal?

  • (3) What "escape clauses" are included in the contract to project the City if the incoming Council (takes office mid-July) seeks to halt the costly process and pursue something more economical...like City Hall seismic retrofit?

    On Oct. 22, a Council majority (8-1, Schipske dissenting) authorized proceeding to issue an RFP for a Civic Center rebuild after only being told the costs to do so would "significant." LBREPORT.com was first (again) to report just how significant: $987,798, with a 10% "contingency," which could become $3.25 million if the first year extends into three years. (This is way beyond the approximate $500,000-$700,000 estimated by management when we asked for an approximate cost range a few hours before the Oct. 22 Council vote.)

    And then there's $750,000 more, coming in a separate Council item, for outside legal counsel.

    And then there's this in the Dec. 3 agendizing memo in management's own words: "Issues may arise in the development of the RFP or analysis of submittals that require additional financial or other consulting assistance. If so, staff will come back to City Council with an additional funding request."

    The contract from which this is stemming is being hidden from Councilmembers and you and us because the Long Beach City Council continues to allow this. LBREPORT.com has repeatedly urged editorially that the City of Long Beach do what some other cities do: attach the texts of large proposed contracts to the agendized items.

    Instead of providing the actual contract, Long Beach management provides a summary of salient contract terms in an accompanying agendizing memo, but esecially on major items, a Readers Digest version doesn't suffice...and that's clear the case with the Dec. 3 Council vote.

    Long Beach taxpayers will see that Council vote on December 3. LBREPORT.com plans (as always) to carry it live.

    Opinions expressed by LBREPORT.com, our contributors and/or our readers are not necessary those of our advertisers. We welcome our readers' comments/opinions 24/7 via Disqus, Facebook, plus moderate length letters and longer-form opinion pieces (op-eds) submitted to us at mail@LBReport.com.



    blog comments powered by Disqus
    2

    Follow LBReport.com w/

    Twitter

    RSS

    Facebook

    Return To Front Page

    Contact us: mail@LBReport.com





  • Private security patrols for Long Beach neighborhoods and business districts



    Ad above provided in the public interest by:



















    Carter Wood Floors
    Hardwood Floor Specialists
    Call (562) 422-2800 or (714) 836-7050




    Return To Front Page

    Contact us: mail@LBReport.com


    Copyright © 2013 LBReport.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use/Legal policy, click here. Privacy Policy, click here