|
[Mr. Ryan limited his response to the City Manager's budget message, noting it set the tone and Councilmembers would likely rely on it. Mr. Ryan said he plans to review the entire budget and respond to it in the coming days. Re the Manager's budget message, he said:]
What a useless piece of [pause] information,
Every time we're talking about an increase in any sort of revenue source, there's not the prior base year given, so you're not even seeing an increase; you're seeing what it's increased up to...
Again, the city is doing the old shuck and jive with no real numbers. They're showing the [budget as] Adopted 2001 [approved by the Council Sept. 2000], the estimated Actual 2001 [how the budget is expected to close in Sept. 2001], and then the Proposed 2002 [for Council consideration and adoption in Sept. 2001].
And the..real numbers that should be in there [are] in a column at the far left which is the 2000 numbers. But instead of showing you what the Actual 2000 numbers are, they show you what the Adopted 2000 numbers are, in other words, what they voted on, not what actually happened.
This is how they managed to hide the fact that the carry overs are just all these hidden monies coming to fore, because, so what if you're carrying over $18 million this year. You'll probably carry over $18 million next year as well. So, that being said, that's how they hide some of their reserves.
Pretty useless. Even when it came down to trying to dissect what actually happened with the utility tax, they were unwilling to say anything other than it's a net loss to the city, When they had an opportunity to break it out and show you what the numbers were, if you look at [the City Manager's budget message], they say here's property taxes and then underneath is "other taxes," which I guess includes sales tax, utility tax, everything else.
It's amazing that when they can be specific, they won't be, other than to say it's a net loss to the city.
It's a pretty useless document, pretty much reminds me of the "masked magician"...on Fox [TV]. for showing all these tricks which really irritated the other magicians whose job it is to fool the people. Well, this is one of those tricks.
When I get the actual budget, I can point out...some comparisons that are worthwhile. All I can say is that I anticipated that. just from the [budget message] document, it shows there's almost $11 or $12 million dollars in new spending -- new spending!
So all this talk last year of what they would have to cut, as I said, they wouldn't have to cut anything, that the rate of growth in the revenues would be more than sufficient to cover any decrease in the utility tax.
And there might be a minuscule amount of additional money after inflation (after the cost of living adjustments) but that's a reason for no additional new spending on "gee whiz" stuff, but no excuse to cut anything...[Received: Aug. 11]
I am skeptically relieved about the budget proposal.
My association and I were splattered with the concerns that there were very rough times ahead as a result of proposition J. In fact, we recently agreed to a one year extension to our current contract (4 yrs) so that we could allow the City to see what the actual effects of measure J would be. Since the City Manager has suggested an acceleration to the tax cut passed by the voters, I feel safe in saying that the effects are clearly not as devastating as originally predicted. To an uneducated person such as myself, it could even appear that Mr. Ryan was very accurate with the information he provided during the measure J campaign.
I now feel confident that there will be no need to cut any services as a result of the Utility Tax Cut. In fact, it appears that next year, when all of the City's employee groups come to the table to bargain, that each one should be able to secure contracts that are economically fair while providing some short term stability.
The City has done well despite some major obstacles, and we are all pleased to see that the financial future of our City is bright. As one of the largest employee organizations in the City, we intend to do everything within our power to help continue along the prosperous path that we all are currently on. [Received: Aug. 11]
...I thought I would mention something in the budget coming maybe from a little different direction, the fact that we have reserves that are untouched. We have about $33 million in reserves.
These reserves being there allow us to borrow money at a cheaper rate, lowers our debt services, reduces the cost of building...
These reserves give us a very good credit rating. The underlying credit rating is a triple A [AAA], which supports the other rating of double A [AA]...
Also, this budget enables us to get back on the multi-year plan to get libraries up to national standards, which means increasing the number of books and hours that the library is open.
And...fortunately we're ahead of funding the Family Learning Centers. We now have 12 of them which allows us to have computer classrooms and parents' participation in helping their child getting their homework done and their assignments in.
President, LB Police Officers Association
Third parties may cite portions as fair use if attributed to "LBReport.com" (print media) or "Long Beach Report dot Com" (electronic media).