LBReport.com

News / With On-Demand Audio

Hear It: Planning Comm'n (5-0) Approves After-the-Fact Permit For Loynes-South Parcel (Hitchcock) Conditioned On City Staff Returning w/in 90 Days w/ Remediation Plan

If your ad were here, people like you all over Long Beach would see it now.

Don't settle for imitations. There's only one LBReport.com. Email us.

  • Neighborhood Groups/Meetings
  • How To Recall a LB Elected Official
  • Crime Data
  • City Council Agendas
  • Port of LB Agendas
  • Planning Comm' Agendas
  • E-Mail Your Council member
  • Council District Map
  • LB Parks, Rec & Marine
  • LB Schools
  • LB Airport Watchdog
  • Sacramento
  • Washington
  • References & Archives
  • Lost, Found & Adoptable Pets
  • (Dec. 4, 2009) -- Following a roughly three hour hearing, LB's Planning Commission voted 5-0 (motion by Van Horik; Smith & Gentile absent) to deny an appeal filed by multiple appellants, uphold a decision of City Hall's Zoning Administrator decison to grant permits to allow and maintain a cap on the (landfill) property with a condition of approval that requests staff to work on a remediation plan and bring it back to Commission within 90 days.

    LBReport.com provides extended on-demand/indexed audio of the proceedings below.

    The decision followed a roughly three hour hearing in which multiple appellants, members of the public and 4th dist. Councilman Patrick O'Donnell (via written statement, previously reported by LBReport.com) sought restoration of the Loynes-South (Hitchcock) parcel (6400 Loynes Dr.), cleared of vegetation by property owner Sean Hitchcock in March 2009 (without Coastal Zone required permits) in response to a city staff weed abatement directive (conveyed to prior landowner Tom Dean).

    City staff recommended upholding the city staff Zoning Administrator (no restoration required). [Link to city staff report, click here.]

    Multiple appellants and members of the public described the property in its prior condition, citing trees, nesting birds and other wildlife. Appellant/area resident Sandie Van Horn displayed photographs. Multiple speakers sought restoration of the property to its previous condition.

    Mr. Hitchcock's lawyer, Charles Hokanson, told the Commission that restoration wasn't necessary. "The site is now as it was then. On March 18, the property was a covered landfill. It had a cap on it. It was a covered landfill, covered with weeds. Today, it is a covered landfill and weeds have now again grown such that we have got a new directive from the Fire Department to cut down the weeds. The site is now exactly as it was then," Mr. Hokanson said.


    March 20, 2009, LBReport.com photo

    The voted action by the non-elected (Mayor chosen, Council approved) Planning Commission decision leaves details of the remedy uncertain for now. The Commission denied the appeals but conditioned granting a permit on a remediation plan that will be developed over the next 90 days by city staff (which in its initial presentation didn't support property restoration). Staff's proposed plan will return to the Commission for further action. The Commission's ruling is ultimately appealable by either side to the Coastal Commission.

    LBReport.com on-demand audio is MP3 format (compressed but still large files that may take a few moments to download); testimony is w/ addresses omitted, pauses shortened, some digressions removed)

    LBReport.com Indexed On-Demand Audio

    City staff presentation
    Appellants' presentations
    Public speakers
    Property owner att'y w/ supportive testimony
    Salient Commission colloquy, motion and vote


    Follow LBReport.com w/

    Twitter

    RSS

    Facebook

    blog comments powered by Disqus

    Return To Front Page

    Contact us: mail@LBReport.com

    Bill Lovelace
    Mobile DJ Entertainment: Weddings & Special Events
    Mike Kowal
    Mike Kowal, Realtor
    Excellence @ (562) 595-1255
    Carter Wood Floors
    Pollman box
    Ninos New Ad




    Copyright © 2009 LBReport.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use/Legal policy, click here. Privacy Policy, click here