LBReport.com

News

Fed'l Appeals Court Upholds $6.5 Mil (Plus Att'y Fees) Judgment Against City In LBPD Fatal Shooting Of Doug Zerby (Hose Nozzle Mistaken For Handgun) City Council, after consulting with City Att'y in closed session, will decide next City move


LBREPORT.com is reader and advertiser supported. Support independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.
(Feb. 5, 2016) -- A three judge panel of the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld the federal trial court civil damages judgment of $6.5 million plus attorney's fees against the City of Long Beach and for familymembers of Doug Zerby.

In December 2010, LBPD officers responded to reports of a man with a gun on outside stairs in courtyard of Belmont Shore apartment units; Mr. Zerby was actually holding/manipulating a garden hose nozzle that resembled a handgun (photo below.)


File photo, LBPD image




The City appealed the federal trial court civil damages verdict; so did Mr. Zerby's familymembers (seeking additional damages for pain and suffering under a federal statute and appealing the trial court's reduction of one of the plaintiff attorney's fees.)

[Scroll down for further.]

Advertisement

Advertisement

The three judge federal appellate panel affirmed (upheld) the trial court's damages judgment against the City, upheld the trial court's award of attorney's fees and dismissed the plaintiffs' appeal re pain and suffering damages under a federeal statute. The Court marked its opinion "Not for Publication," meaning it's not precedent in subsequent cases in most circumstances (but not forbidding its publication by us or others.)

To view the opinion, click here.

LBREPORT.com has invited comment for publication from the LB City Attorney's office.

Advertisement

Advertisement

LBREPORT.com's independent (and without city confirmation) understanding is that procedurally, the City (ultimately via a decision by the City Council in closed session after consulting with the City Attorney) could choose to appeal the three-judge appellate panel's opinion and seek either an en banc ruling by 11 members of the 9th Cir. Court of Appeals court or seek review by the U.S. Supreme Court...or try to settle the case for prompt payment of some lesser sum than the judgment that the three judge panel just upheld but the City could appeal further (meaning additional time before plaintiffs receive payment, if any.) Obviously, settlement requires agreement by both sides.

The L.A. County District Attorney office concluded (in a review independent of the City's internal review) that the two LB officers who fired their weapons acted lawfully (actually and reasonably believed that Mr. Zerby was armed with a firearm and acted in self-defense and in the defense of others.)

Further as we receive it.

Advertisement

Advertisement



blog comments powered by Disqus

Recommend LBREPORT.com to your Facebook friends:


Follow LBReport.com with:

Twitter

Facebook

RSS

Return To Front Page

Contact us: mail@LBReport.com







Adoptable pet of the week:





Carter Wood Floors
Hardwood Floor Specialists
Call (562) 422-2800 or (714) 836-7050


Copyright © 2016 LBReport.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use/Legal policy, click here. Privacy Policy, click here