|(Feb. 5, 2017, 11:05 a.m.) -- As carried LIVE on LBREPORT.com, LB's Planning Comm'n indicated it wants to discuss making possible changes before sending to the City Council a city-staff-advanced new Land Use Element that would completely revise the way Long Beach City Hall treats land uses citywide.
Capping nearly three hours of discussion on a
Some Planning Commissioners indicated they wanted to see density allocated in what they called a "more equitable" manner citywide, not overly concentrated in Wrigley or on the westside. Commission chair Donita Van Horik suggested increased density might be appropriate for areas near ELB's LBCC campus along parts of Lakewood Blvd. and Bellflower Blvd.
City staff's proposed newly designed Land Use Element (LUE), accompanied by an entirely new proposed Urban Design Element, invite future changes to the city's zoning (which is supposed to be consistent with the Land Use Element.) These changes could create economic incentives for projects and developments that, over time, could change the area's residential and commercial densities.
The changes wouldn't happen overnight; they might be subtle at first, occurring in some areas but not others; they might not happen, or if they do, they might be years away. But once City Hall makes the changes, the process would be driven by economics. By increasing allowable land uses, City Hall would create economic incentives for more intense residential and commercial uses and developments.
[Scroll down for further.]
At the hearing, a sizable number of Wrigley area residents testified, along with smaller numbers of residents from Alamitos Beach, SE LB and ELB, who consistently voiced concerns about inviting increased commercial and residential densities in their areas. A number of Wrigley area residents sought to prevent increased commercial density (of up to 4-5 stories) along parts of Pacific Ave. between 20th and 25th Streets and objected to sending increased density into their already-impacted neighborhoods.
City staff contended that allowing more intense commercial and residential uses provides the economic incentive to turn over land and re-develop and improve current properties. At one point, Advance Planning Officer Chris Koontz said that if housing density isn't increased in one area, it would have to be increased in other areas (a premise not publicly questioned by Commissioners.)
Development Services Director Amy Bodek further indicated that state legislation now requires locating residential units near transit (such as the Metro Blue Line along LB Blvd.) and the City finds itself increasingly impacted by a mandated regulatory framework.
A number of public speakers also questioned, and city staff defended, City Hall's use of an underlying programmatic EIR which would effectively limit the public to raising issues about limited impacts of specific projects, not larger impacts that the underlying EIR had already discussed and the Council had approved as allowable for "overriding considerations."
The new Land Use Element, as proposed, classifies the sprawling residential area (stretching from basically Lakewood Blvd/Clark Ave. to the eastern city limits, and from Atherton St. to Carson St.) as a "Founding and Contemporary Neighborhood" Placetype (area in yellow on map below.) It describes this PlaceType for "single family and low density housing" but an accompanying table lists "PlaceType, Density and Intensity Levels (p. 65) that would allow residential densities ranging from 7 dwelling units per acre up to 18 dwelling units per acre.
For a rough idea of what 18 dwelling units per acre might look like, the controversial "Riverwalk" residential development (allowed by the Council on the former Will J. Reid scout park site) sought only roughly 13 dwelling units per acre and the Crown Point development built in the late 1970s in the 7th district near Los Cerritos Park allowed a bit over 14 dwelling units per acre. [We presume allowing up to double-digit residential densities in parts of ELB may be meant to invite townhouses, condos or the like in some areas depending on future zoning.] Two ELB residents, Ann Cantrell and Corliss Lee, raised the 18 dwelling units/acre issue...but no Planning Commissioners followed-up.
The text narrative describing the "Founding and Contemporary Neighborhood" PlaceType likewise invites density by proposing "appropriately scaled multi-family structures" at "neighborhood edges, transitions and key intersections..." [LUE, p. 75]
The "Placetype, Density and Intensity" table on p. 65 indicates that the maximum allowable residential height is "2 stories, 28 feet" but a footnote states that: "Height may be increased to three stories as shown on MAP LU-7 consistent with the existing land use pattern." Currently much ELB's current R-1 type zoning allows up to two stories plus an added two feet for stair access to the roof.
Meanwhile, in ELB's commercial nodes, the new Land Use Element proposes to allow three story commercial buildings instead of the area's current mainly-low-rise one-story commercial buildings at Spring/Woodruff/LCD, Spring/Palo Verde, Spring/Bellflower, and the Los Altos shopping center along Bellflower Blvd. north and south of Stearns St. and the ELB Carson St. Towne Center. [Source: Eastside Placetype Maps pp. 66-67 (legend on p. 67) plus the "PlaceType, Density and Intensity Levels" p. 65, with footnoted text indicating maximum height limits can vary; p. 65 refers to Map LU7 but the Land Use Placetype Height Limits appear on Map LU8 p. 68 which indicates the height limits could reach three stories.] Current zoning height for these commercial areas is limited to two stories.
In the new Land Use Element, the areas in light purple on the PlaceType map above -- the current shopping areas at Spring/Woodruff/LCD and Wardlow/LCD/Palo Verde -- are designated as "Neighborhood-Serving Centers and Corridors -- Low" for "low-rise, low-intensity mixed use (housing and retail) commercial centers and corridors designed to meet consumers’ daily needs for goods and services close to residential areas (see Map LU-11). Ideally, residents could walk to these locations for shopping, personal services or dining. This PlaceType applies to locations where shopping combined with low-density housing is desirable from both a land use and mobility perspective. This is frequently the case at major street intersections and/or along established neighborhood shopping corridors, particularly where these corridors are served by transit." [LUE, p. 80]
Below are "Preferred uses and development standards" for commercial areas at Spring St./Woodruff/LCD and Wardlow/LCD/Palo Verde:
The Placetypes in red -- the "Plaza" at Spring St./Palo Verde, the SE commercial center at Bellflower/Spring St., the Los Altos Shopping Center (along Bellflower, both sides of Stearns St.) and ELB Towne Center -- are described as "Community Commercial" meant to encourage "a wide range of local and community-serving commercial uses in buildings [limited to three stories at these locations]...These may include auto sales and repair, appliance sales and repair, furniture stores, hardware stores, clothing stores, restaurants, grocery stores, fast-food outlets and similar uses. Preferred uses and development standards include:
Overall, City Hall's planners proposed the following for ELB:
[Proposed Land Use Element, Eastside, Issues/Needs, pp. 147-148] . The Eastside of Long Beach is well-served by schools, libraries, police and fire facilities. Recreation open space in the community is abundant, although more neighborhood-focused park space is desirable as much of the existing public open space is devoted to golf and sports fields. Another issue in recent years is the mansionization of single-family homes and the over-development of parcels, which have left little open space. Needed are greater design controls and higher standards to ensure that remodels of existing homes and insertions of new developments are attractive, composed of quality materials, and compatible with neighboring uses and structures. Although shopping opportunities are fairly good for Eastside residents, most centers are too far to walk to for the majority of people and are highly automobile-oriented in design. Vehicular traffic moves well throughout the area; however, it is often at the expense of other modes of travel, namely pedestrians and bicyclists. In the future, a better multi-modal balance is called for. Traffic will need to be calmed and controlled so residents feel safe to walk or ride their bicycles for short trips or daily exercise. Also detracting from East Long Beach walkability and attractiveness is the lack of street trees along many streets. Many need to be replaced due to the age of the trees.[Comment: Do eastside residents (including those who object to the green "bollards" along part of Studebaker Rd) want traffic "to be calmed and controlled so residents feel safe to walk or ride their bicycles for short trips or daily exercise?"]
And yes, it's always possible that a Council majority (now or in the future) could modify parts of an adopted land use element. For example, the retail center now at the SE quadrant of Bellflower/Spring (with the K-Mart and Lowes), formerly a drive-in theater, was designated in the City's Land Use Element to transition to high quality housing...but was subsequently amended by the Council to accommodate the economic desires of the property owner.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Recommend LBREPORT.com to your Facebook friends:
Follow LBReport.com with:
Contact us: mail@LBReport.com
Hardwood Floor Specialists
Call (562) 422-2800 or (714) 836-7050