|(Jan. 23, 2018, 11:35 a.m.) -- LBREPORT.com has learned that a hot button neighborhood -- and now potentially citywide impacting Airport issue -- is coming to the LB City Council on
LBREPORT.com has learned that JetBlue has escalated to a formal City Council hearing, scheduled for
Management's summary of the dispute (relating to whether the ordinance exempts from fines nationwide ATC-caused delays, such as east coast weather, or only locally caused ATC delays) is summarized in the Airport Director's decision (a document requested by LBREPORT.com, provided by LB Airport and linked for our readers here.).
But the dispute arises in a larger context.
[Scroll down for further.]
As reported (first, again) by LBREPORT.com earlier today (Jan. 23) [here], JetBlue submitted a sternly worded Sept. 12, 2017 letter to LB Airport stating that amendments now being considered to LB's Airport ordinance that would increase night fines to deter late night ordinance violations "appear intended to have a discriminatory effect specifically on JetBlue" [and] "seem designed to encourage JetBlue to terminate service." JetBlue's Sept. 2017 letter urged the City "to proceed cautiously and to carefully consider" the company's specific comments (detailed below) warning "Any decision otherwise could lead to a protracted dispute as we believe the City's actions will violate certain Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) provisions and create regulatory conflicts with both the FAA and U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT)."
In its Sept. 2017 comment letter on the proposed ordinance amendments, JetBlue St. VP and Associate General Counsel Robert Land wrote in part:
Contrary to law, the proposed changes to penalty amounts for noise violations are unreasonably steep and appear to be arbitrarily but specifically crafted to harm JetBlue [footnote omitted here], a carrier that operates at LGB and which has a majority of its fleet operate to and from cities that disproportionately have Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)-imposed air traffic control restrictions which result in delays over which JetBlue has no control (mostly at Northeast markets in New York City and Boston and in the San Francisco bay area) which can cause late operations at Long Beach..
Long Beach currently has the protection of a "grandfathering" provision in the federal Airport Noise Capacity Act (ANCA) that lets LB Airport (one of only a handful Airports nationally) maintain some local flight limits/neighborhood protections. If Long Beach were to lose its ANCA "grandfathering" protection (through an adverse FAA decision or in federal court litigation), LB could lose the current protections in its Airport ordinance, exposing the City of Long Beach to unlimited numbers of flights at unlimited noise levels at all hours on all runways.
LB's Airport ordinance includes a "curfew" requiring air carriers to schedule all departures and arrivals between 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m., although air carrier operations between 10 p.m. and 11 p.m. are allowed if the delays result from weather, air traffic, or mechanical issues. Violations between 10 p.m. and 11 p.m. caused by unanticipated delays beyond the operator's reasonable control (such as weather, air traffic or mechanical issues) are waived on presentation of evidence satisfactory to the City that the delayed arrival or departure resulted from these circumstances. Air carrier operations after 11 p.m. are automatically deemed violations and fined; after two warnings, a third violation brings an administrative fine of $100; the fourth and subsequent fines are $300. Proposed amendments to those fine levels are detailed on p. 9-10 of the PPT at this link.
The proposed ordinance amendment surfaced in August 2017 after 4th dist. Councilman Daryl Supernaw had been doing a slow burn for months over JetBlue's late night ordinance violations, regularly tallying the numbers in his newsletter to constituents. In his July 7, 2017 weekly newsletter, Councilman Supernaw headlined an item "JetBlue Fined Record-Breaking $168,900 for June Noise Violations" and wrote:
It has become painfully obvious, especially to those living under the flight path, that our "coveted" noise ordinance is not serving its intended purpose. JetBlue violated the 11:00 pm curfew 31 times (every night on average) and the 10:00 pm curfew 48 times last month. This clearly indicates the fine structure is not an adequate deterrent to violating the curfew. For that reason, I will be introducing a city council agenda item in the very near future to examine this issue.
Councilman Supernaw's newsletter included the following chart:
On July 7, 2017, Councilman Supernaw signaled that he planned to introduce a City Council agenda item (date not specified) to examine the issue of the LB Airport ordinance's fine structure in the context of providing a better deterrent. The Council agenda item never happened, presumably preempted by Airport management's announcement in August that it would pursue the ordinance amendments now being considered.
And the Council hearing -- with a recorded Council vote -- will pccur as vote-by-mail ballots are flying in contested citywide elections for Mayor and Councilmembers in districts 3, 5, 7 and 9.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Recommend LBREPORT.com to your Facebook friends:
Follow LBReport.com with:
Contact us: mail@LBReport.com
Hardwood Floor Specialists
Call (562) 422-2800 or (714) 836-7050