LBReport.com

News / Perspective

Mayor Garcia Abruptly Removes From Council Discussion -- Effectively Preventing Opponents From Speaking To -- Agenda Item That Sought To Prevent City Hall Advisory Commissions From Agendizing/Discussing/Advising On Subjects Without Permission And Making It Easier For Mayor/Council To Oust Advisory Comm'rs; Garcia Indicates He'll Talk With Councilmembers And Commissioners Before Bringing Item Back


LBREPORT.com is reader and advertiser supported. Support independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.
(July 11, 2018, 8:50 a.m.) -- Mayor Robert Garcia abruptly moved to temporarily head-off a public confrontation over an item -- which had been on the July 10 City Council agenda for over a week -- that sought Council voted approval to draft rules that would effectively prevent Mayor-chosen/Council-approved "Advisory Commissions" from agendizing/discussing/offering advice on subjects without approval of the City Manager (who answers to the Mayor/Council) or city staff.

The same item also proposed to give the Mayor the power to remove Advisory Commissioner(s) without publicly stating any reason with Council majority voted approval, effectively indicating that the Mayor had approved the proposed changes as agendized although they were publicly attributed to city management.

[Scroll down for further.]

LBREPORT.com was the only LB news outlet that alerted to our readers to details of the item, which triggered push-back (opposition emails/social network comments) from some residents leading up to the Council meeting. Among those in the Council Chamber prepared to speak in opposition to the item were former 5th district Council candidate Corliss Lee and veteran community activist Ann Cantrell.

The item was number 27 on the agenda...and near the start of the Council meeting, Mayor Garcia stated: "Items 25 and 26 are going to be postponed...and also item 27 which is more of a technical report from city management on commissions as they relate to the way they operate. I've asked staff to please bring that back at a later date once they do a little bit more outreach with both Councilmembrs as well as some of the Commissioners and Commissions and so that will be my request..."

Mayor Garcia's upcoming discussions with Councilmembers and his chosen Advisory Commissioners will now presumably seek to line up support before bringing the item back to the Council. Pulling the item off the July 10 agenda effectively avoided any public discussion of the matter for now.

As visible in the memo agendized here, it wasn't exactly a "technical report" portrayed by Mayor Garcia. It explicitly requested Council voted approval to draft rules that would limit the topics Council-created Advisory Commissions could agendize for discussion and voted actions...and gave the Mayor and Council the ability to easily remove any Advisory Commissioners who attempted to offer advice that the Mayor/Council or management didn't want to hear.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The accompanying agendizing memo portrayed the changes as clarifying efficiency measures:

[B]oth the [advisory] bodies and the City Council have recently expressed some confusion about the bodies' roles and responsibilities, including best practices for how bodies should operate, transmit ideas to the City Council, and set agendas. Moreover, a lack of clearly identifiable roles and guidelines have prevented the bodies from operating in an effective and efficient manner. In response, the Offices of the Mayor, City Manager, and the City Attorney have discussed various options to enhance the delivery of services by the bodies, and determined that amending key sections of the LBMC pertaining to the bodies would significantly improve how the bodies operate with the City Council and City staff.

The proposed changes will enable members of the bodies to better understand their roles and responsibilities, allow City staff to better support the bodies through defined operating procedures, and provide guidelines for communicating input to the Mayor and the City Council. Specific changes will clearly address defining the duties and functions of advisory bodies, identifying the City staff responsible for setting the advisory bodies' agendas, clarifying the permissible uses of City staff resources, and clarifying authority over City officers and employees. The intention is to strengthen the impact and effectiveness of the City's advisory bodies, and make the work more efficient and productive.

Developing.

Sponsor


Sponsor

Sponsor



Support really independent news in Long Beach. No one in LBREPORT.com's ownership, reporting or editorial decision-making has ties to incumbent Long Beach officials, development interests, advocacy groups or other special interests; or is seeking or receiving benefits of City development-related decisions; or holds a City Hall appointive position; or has contributed sums to political campaigns for Long Beach incumbents or challengers. LBREPORT.com isn't part of an out of town corporate cluster and no one its ownership, editorial or publishing decisionmaking has been part of the governing board of any City government body or other entity on whose policies we report. LBREPORT.com is reader and advertiser supported. You can help keep really independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.


blog comments powered by Disqus

Recommend LBREPORT.com to your Facebook friends:


Follow LBReport.com with:

Twitter

Facebook

RSS

Return To Front Page

Contact us: mail@LBReport.com



Adoptable pet of the week:





Carter Wood Floors
Hardwood Floor Specialists
Call (562) 422-2800 or (714) 836-7050


Copyright © 2018 LBReport.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use/Legal policy, click here. Privacy Policy, click here