LBReport.com

News / Follow-Up

LBFD Mgm't And Firefighters Ass'n Signal Support For Some Type Of New Fees For Services; LBPD Mgm't and Police Officers Ass'n Mum For Now On New Money Sources

by Tori Ann Lerch *

* Ms. Lerch is a 3rd year Long Beach City College Journalism student.


LBREPORT.com is reader and advertiser supported. Support independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.

(April 22, 2015, 7:18 p.m.) -- As seen LIVE and reported first (again) on LBREPORT.com, on April 17 the City Council's Public Safety Committee (Price, Austin, with Mungo absent) asked LBPD and LBFD management to present what Committee chair Price called [agendized text] "alternate funding sources for public safety" and "innovative ways" to address public safety needs.

  • LBFD management: Long Beach Fire Chief Mike DuRee testified that he plans to propose that the City Council consider what he called a "First Responder Fee," a fee separate from current ambulance charges already assessed. Chief DuRee didn't provide the Committee with details and didn't submit written testimony but indicated he plans to bring a "First Responder Fee" proposal forward for Council discussion in the coming weeks.

[Scroll down for further.] .


An online search indicates some California cities have implemented "First Responder Fees" although their substance varies. Garden Grove charges a First Responder Fee to nonresidents of the city, with exceptions to business owners and family members who are in the home of a resident at the time. Elk Grove and Galt have a First Responder Fee intended to cover the costs of a fire truck or engine responding to advanced life-supporting calls.

LBREPORT.com sought information from Chief DuRee's office on what he plans to propose; our inquiry remains pending; we'll update our text with a response as received.

[Scroll down for further.]

Advertisement

Advertisement

  • LB Firefighters Ass'n: The Long Beach Firefighters Association (firefighters' union) didn't testify at the Committee in person but submitted a letter (visible in full in LBREPORT.com's previous coverage at this link.) proposing two initiatives. One proposal would create a "Fire District," which [LBFFA letter text] "would create a permanent long-term solution to rebuilding the Long Beach Fire Department and keeping it on a stable financial footing. Fire district formations are not new and many fire districts currently exist in the California."

    In very general terms, Fire Districts in other communities affect the way a fire department is run and funded. Fire districts operate basically as independent service entities and receive funds from taxes and/or fees. A portion of taxes paid by property owners could go to the fire district or an additional fee may be assessed in each district.

    LBFFA's letter also proposes "Fire Management Consolidation," stating: "Fire management has not been examined for efficiencies that can be made, nor have they been subject to cuts over the years. Several cities, recognizing that they can no longer cut operational sworn firefighters, have implemented fire management sharing with neighboring jurisdictions. Fullerton and Brea in Orange County have implemented such a model."

    LBREPORT.com sought details from LBFFA on exactly what it seeks in both of its proposals; our inquiry remains pending; we'll update our text with a response as received.)

    [Scroll down for further.]

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

  • LBPD management: LBPD Deputy Chief David Hendricks testified that the Department has already implemented various technological innovations (including real-time video feeds from privately owned security cameras) and also partners with other city departments and with non-profits and hopes to do more as opportunities arise. He didn't specify any new fees or taxes.

  • LB Police Officers Ass'n: The LBPOA provided no in-person or written testimony to the Committee. LBREPORT.com contacted the LBPOA to learn if it favors any "alternate funding sources for public safety" or "innovative ways" to address public safety needs. Its response is pending and will be added here as received.

[Scroll down for further.]

Advertisement


Advertisement

Council majorities ultimately decide budget spending, and at the Committee meeting, neither Committee chair Price nor vice chair Austin (Mungo was absent) publicly questioned "proportionate share" budget reductions (initiated under former Mayor Bob Foster and his Council majorities) that have brought significant cuts to police and fire budgets (the General Fund's two largest spending areas) and reduced public safety service levels previously received by taxpayers.

Committee vice-chair Austin stated that he believes many of the solutions to public safety funding "may require a conversation with our residents...with the voters, on how they want to see resources allocated, if they want to commit new resources to public safety." Committee chair Price made a motion, seconded by vice-chair Austin, that at the Committee's next meeting "that there be an analysis or a review of some possible innovative options that each department can undertake or study in terms of finding more efficiencies in anticipation of the potential cuts that are coming." Chair Price indicated her Committee's next meeting would be in roughly two months.

Developing. LBREPORT.com will be following these proposals and will report details as we learn them.



blog comments powered by Disqus

Recommend LBREPORT.com to your Facebook friends:


Follow LBReport.com with:

Twitter

Facebook

RSS

Return To Front Page

Contact us: mail@LBReport.com







Adoptable pet of the week:






Carter Wood Floors
Hardwood Floor Specialists
Call (562) 422-2800 or (714) 836-7050


Copyright © 2015 LBReport.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use/Legal policy, click here. Privacy Policy, click here