(March 15, 2017) -- With no background information provided online for the public prior to the meeting, the Mayor-chosen chair of the City Council's Elections Oversight Committee, 2nd district Councilwoman Jeannine Pearce, delivered a verbal presentation on a matter she agendized for her Committee's March 14 meeting regarding [agendized title] "lowering the voter age in Long Beach to 17."
Councilwoman Price spoke accompanied by Power Point slides supportive of lowering the voting age to 17 (text below). She noted that (as previously reported by LBREPORT.com, details below), Assemblyman Evan Low (D, Campbell) has introduced a proposed state constitutional amendment that, if placed on a statewide ballot by 2/3 votes of the Assembly and state Senate and approved by voters, would lower California's voting age statewide to 17. [Scroll down for further] |
Among the Power Point slides presented by Committee chair Pearce:
Committee chair Pearce said her Committee agenda item was to "put these matters on the record" and asked Committee members Andrews and Supernaw if they had any comments. They didn't and said nothing. There were no comments from members of the public (and the Council Chamber appeared to be basically empty for the 3 p.m. hour Committee meeting.) A motion was made to receive and file the item, taking no immediate action on it...for now.
The LB Council Committee's agenda item comes as a number of Sacramento Democrats have joined in proposing a state Constitutional Amendment (ACA 10) that would lower CA's statewide voting age from 18 to 17. The measure (principal author is Assemblyman Evan Low (D, Campbell), joined by co-authors Assemblymembers Mullin, Berman, Calderon and Chen with Senate co-author Stern) would require 2/3 approval by the Assembly and state Senate -- which now both have 2/3 Dem majorities after CA's November elections -- to put it on the 2018 ballot where CA voters (over 18) would decide.
In a release, Assemblyman Low states: "Our country was founded on resisting taxation without representation, and yet every election cycle, teenagers face this centuries-old disenfranchisement...Young people are our future. Lowering the voting age will help give them a voice in the democratic process and instill a lifelong habit of voting." His release text states in part that "many 18 year olds are usually in a time of transition -- graduating from high school, going to college, or getting a job. Lowering the voting age to 17 will catch youth at a time when they are still connected to their school, their home, and their community." Assemblyman Low's release says eleven states, including CA, currently let 17 year olds preregister to vote, and says 22 states and the District of Columbia allow 17 year olds to vote in primary elections or party caucuses if the voter will turn 18 before the election.
In addition, primary voting at age 17 is among the projects of "Fair Vote," based in a Washington, D.C. suburb, whose current and past funding sources include the "Open Society Foundations" founded and board chaired by George Soros.) "Fair Vote" advocates on its website pages "that states and political parties act to allow citizens who will be 18 years old on or before the general election to vote in their party’s corresponding primary or caucus. A notable portion of citizens who have the right to vote in the general election in November currently do not have a voice in determining who will be on that general election ballot. Granting voting rights in primaries and caucuses to these 17-year-olds is only fair and will increase their political engagement through participation. Policymakers can implement this reform by state law or party rule." Developing. blog comments powered by Disqus Recommend LBREPORT.com to your Facebook friends:
Follow LBReport.com with:
Contact us: mail@LBReport.com |
Hardwood Floor Specialists Call (562) 422-2800 or (714) 836-7050 |