Joe Sopo
Joe Sopo, Realtor has his pulse On LB real estate. Click for info
.
Become A Hero To LB Animals With A $20 Membership. Info, Click Here.
Friends of LB Animals
Saving Lives Thru Spay/Neuter & Education

Model T
Pollman's Insurance, Classic Or New, Car Or Home, When You Want It Insured, Call Us And Save! Click for info.


Ninos Ristorante: A delicious treasure in Bixby Knolls. Click here if you're hungry or for catering!
3853 Atlantic Ave.

  • Neighborhood Groups/Meetings
  • How To Recall a LB Elected Official
  • Crime Data
  • City Council Agendas
  • Port of LB Agendas
  • Planning Comm'n Agendas
  • E-Mail Your Council member
  • Council District Map
  • LB Parks, Rec & Marine
  • LB Schools
  • LB Airport Watchdog
  • Sacramento
  • Washington
  • References & Archives
  • Lost, Found & Adoptable Pets
  • LBReport.com

    News

    Supreme Court Fallout: House Overwhelmingly Passes Bill To Curtail Eminent Domain Against Private Property Owners...While "Nat'l League of Cities" & "U.S. Conference of Mayors" -- Backed By LB Tax Dollars -- Seek To Blunt Remedial Legislation


    (November 7, 2005) -- The U.S. House of Representatives has passed a bill that would freeze for two years federal economic development funds to state and local government entities that use eminent domain to obtain or subsequently use private property for economic development and would prohibit the federal government from using economic development as a reason to exercise eminent domain.

    The "Private Property Protection Act" (H R 4128) cleared the House on a 376-38 vote, with LB area representatives Juanita Millender-McDonald (D., Carson-LB), Dana Rohrabacher (R., HB-LB-PV) and Ed Royce (R., NE LB/OC) voted "yes" on the bill, which has been referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee. LBReport.com posts the bill's text in full below.

    The legislation comes in the wake of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling (5-4) that lets city and state officials [subject to state laws] take private property for projects officials they claim promote economic progress.

    The "National League of Cities" and "U.S. Conference of Mayors" -- private groups whose activities LB taxpayers support through City Hall dues, memberships, convention attendance, etc.) -- are pressing Congress in efforts to blunt the remedial legislation.

    Both groups previously submitted "Friend of the Court" to the U.S. Supreme Court, urging a ruling against the interests of private property owners. Their lobbying in Congress takes place as the Long Beach City Council remains publicly silent on the issue.

    As of Nov. 7, the National League of Cities website stated in part, "NLC [National League of Cities] believes that H.R. 4128 would freeze the process of economic development across the country." A link to "Take Action Now!" is restricted to members only.

    The U.S. Conference of Mayors website carries a report indicating apparent support for verbiage (inserted in a 2006 appropriuations bill for federal Transportation, Treasury & Housing agencies) to prohibit use of federal funds to support federal, state or local projects that seek to use eminent domain...unless eminent domain is used for "public use." In the words of the U.S. Conference of Mayors' website, this "leaves the door open for government officials to use eminent domain to promote economic development so long as there is a determination of public use by a local, state or federal official authorized to make such decisions, and such determination is capable of being subject to judicial review, and the economic development does not primarily benefit private entities. The Senate bill also makes clear that any use of federal funds for the removal of blight, and for infrastructure projects such as mass transit, railroad, airport, highway, water and waste water as well as utility projects that benefit or serve the general public 'shall be considered a public use for purposes of eminent domain.'"

    The U.S. Conference of Mayors report continues:

    Senator Christopher Bond (MO), who chairs the Subcommittee on Appropriations for Transportation, Treasury and Housing, appears to have listened to concerns expressed by local officials who urged Congress not to rush to move a permanent fix to the Kelo decision before examining more closely how eminent domain is being used in states and localities across that nation. The Senate measure is temporary since the eminent domain restrictions are included in an annual appropriations bill. In response to local concerns, a provision was included in the bill calling for a study on the nationwide use of eminent domain within 12 months after enactment. The study would be conducted by the Government Accountability Office in consultation with organizations representing state and local governments.

    LBReport.com posts below the text of the House bill (HR 4128) -- the Private Property Protection Act -- which has been sent to the Senate, which referred it to the Senate Judiciary Committee:

    [begin text]


    Private Property Rights Protection Act of 2005 (Engrossed as Agreed to or Passed by House)

    109th CONGRESS

    1st Session

    H. R. 4128

    AN ACT

    To protect private property rights.

    HR 4128 EH

    109th CONGRESS

    1st Session

    H. R. 4128

    AN ACT

    To protect private property rights.

      Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

    SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

      This Act may be cited as the `Private Property Rights Protection Act of 2005'.

    SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON EMINENT DOMAIN ABUSE BY STATES.

      (a) In General- No State or political subdivision of a State shall exercise its power of eminent domain, or allow the exercise of such power by any person or entity to which such power has been delegated, over property to be used for economic development or over property that is subsequently used for economic development, if that State or political subdivision receives Federal economic development funds during any fiscal year in which it does so.

      (b) Ineligibility for Federal Funds- A violation of subsection (a) by a State or political subdivision shall render such State or political subdivision ineligible for any Federal economic development funds for a period of 2 fiscal years following a final judgment on the merits by a court of competent jurisdiction that such subsection has been violated, and any Federal agency charged with distributing those funds shall withhold them for such 2-year period, and any such funds distributed to such State or political subdivision shall be returned or reimbursed by such State or political subdivision to the appropriate Federal agency or authority of the Federal Government, or component thereof.

      (c) Opportunity to Cure Violation- A State or political subdivision shall not be ineligible for any Federal economic development funds under subsection (b) if such State or political subdivision returns all real property the taking of which was found by a court of competent jurisdiction to have constituted a violation of subsection (a) and replaces any other property destroyed and repairs any other property damaged as a result of such violation.

    SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON EMINENT DOMAIN ABUSE BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

      The Federal Government or any authority of the Federal Government shall not exercise its power of eminent domain to be used for economic development.

    SEC. 4. PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION.

      (a) Cause of Action- Any owner of private property who suffers injury as a result of a violation of any provision of this Act may bring an action to enforce any provision of this Act in the appropriate Federal or State court, and a State shall not be immune under the eleventh amendment to the Constitution of the United States from any such action in a Federal or State court of competent jurisdiction. In such action, the defendant has the burden to show by clear and convincing evidence that the taking is not for economic development. Any such property owner may also seek any appropriate relief through a preliminary injunction or a temporary restraining order.

      (b) Limitation on Bringing Action- An action brought under this Act may be brought if the property is used for economic development following the conclusion of any condemnation proceedings condemning the private property of such property owner, but shall not be brought later than seven years following the conclusion of any such proceedings and the subsequent use of such condemned property for economic development.

      (c) Attorneys' Fee and Other Costs- In any action or proceeding under this Act, the court shall allow a prevailing plaintiff a reasonable attorneys' fee as part of the costs, and include expert fees as part of the attorneys' fee.

    SEC. 5. NOTIFICATION BY ATTORNEY GENERAL.

      (a) Notification to States and Political Subdivisions-

        (1) Not later than 30 days after the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall provide to the chief executive officer of each State the text of this Act and a description of the rights of property owners under this Act.

        (2) Not later than 120 days after the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall compile a list of the Federal laws under which Federal economic development funds are distributed. The Attorney General shall compile annual revisions of such list as necessary. Such list and any successive revisions of such list shall be communicated by the Attorney General to the chief executive officer of each State and also made available on the Internet website maintained by the United States Department of Justice for use by the public and by the authorities in each State and political subdivisions of each State empowered to take private property and convert it to public use subject to just compensation for the taking.

      (b) Notification to Property Owners- Not later than 30 days after the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall publish in the Federal Register and make available on the Internet website maintained by the United States Department of Justice a notice containing the text of this Act and a description of the rights of property owners under this Act.

    SEC. 6. REPORT.

      Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and every subsequent year thereafter, the Attorney General shall transmit a report identifying States or political subdivisions that have used eminent domain in violation of this Act to the Chairman and Ranking Member of the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and to the Chairman and Ranking Member of the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate. The report shall--

        (1) identify all private rights of action brought as a result of a State's or political subdivision's violation of this Act;

        (2) identify all States or political subdivisions that have lost Federal economic development funds as a result of a violation of this Act, as well as describe the type and amount of Federal economic development funds lost in each State or political subdivision and the Agency that is responsible for withholding such funds;

        (3) discuss all instances in which a State or political subdivision has cured a violation as described in section 2(c) of this Act.

    SEC. 7. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING RURAL AMERICA.

      (a) Findings- The Congress finds the following:

        (1) The founders realized the fundamental importance of property rights when they codified the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, which requires that private property shall not be taken `for public use, without just compensation'.

        (2) Rural lands are unique in that they are not traditionally considered high tax revenue-generating properties for State and local governments. In addition, farmland and forest land owners need to have long-term certainty regarding their property rights in order to make the investment decisions to commit land to these uses.

        (3) Ownership rights in rural land are fundamental building blocks for our Nation's agriculture industry, which continues to be one of the most important economic sectors of our economy.

        (4) In the wake of the Supreme Court's decision in Kelo v. City of New London, abuse of eminent domain is a threat to the property rights of all private property owners, including rural land owners.

      (b) Sense of Congress- It is the sense of Congress that the use of eminent domain for the purpose of economic development is a threat to agricultural and other property in rural America and that the Congress should protect the property rights of Americans, including those who reside in rural areas. Property rights are central to liberty in this country and to our economy. The use of eminent domain to take farmland and other rural property for economic development threatens liberty, rural economies, and the economy of the United States. The taking of farmland and rural property will have a direct impact on existing irrigation and reclamation projects. Furthermore, the use of eminent domain to take rural private property for private commercial uses will force increasing numbers of activities from private property onto this Nation's public lands, including its National forests, National parks and wildlife refuges. This increase can overburden the infrastructure of these lands, reducing the enjoyment of such lands for all citizens. Americans should not have to fear the government's taking their homes, farms, or businesses to give to other persons. Governments should not abuse the power of eminent domain to force rural property owners from their land in order to develop rural land into industrial and commercial property. Congress has a duty to protect the property rights of rural Americans in the face of eminent domain abuse.

    SEC. 8. DEFINITIONS.

      In this Act the following definitions apply:

        (1) ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT- The term `economic development' means taking private property, without the consent of the owner, and conveying or leasing such property from one private person or entity to another private person or entity for commercial enterprise carried on for profit, or to increase tax revenue, tax base, employment, or general economic health, except that such term shall not include--

          (A) conveying private property--

            (i) to public ownership, such as for a road, hospital, airport, or military base;

            (ii) to an entity, such as a common carrier, that makes the property available to the general public as of right, such as a railroad or public facility;

            (iii) for use as a road or other right of way or means, open to the public for transportation, whether free or by toll;

            (iv) for use as an aqueduct, flood control facility, pipeline, or similar use;

          (B) removing harmful uses of land provided such uses constitute an immediate threat to public health and safety;

          (C) leasing property to a private person or entity that occupies an incidental part of public property or a public facility, such as a retail establishment on the ground floor of a public building;

          (D) acquiring abandoned property;

          (E) clearing defective chains of title;

          (F) taking private property for use by a public utility; and

          (G) redeveloping of a brownfield site as defined in the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act (42 U.S.C. 9601(39)).

        (2) FEDERAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUNDS- The term `Federal economic development funds' means any Federal funds distributed to or through States or political subdivisions of States under Federal laws designed to improve or increase the size of the economies of States or political subdivisions of States.

        (3) STATE- The term `State' means each of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any other territory or possession of the United States.

    SEC. 9. SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE.

      (a) Severability- The provisions of this Act are severable. If any provision of this Act, or any application thereof, is found unconstitutional, that finding shall not affect any provision or application of the Act not so adjudicated.

      (b) Effective Date- This Act shall take effect upon the first day of the first fiscal year that begins after the date of the enactment of this Act, but shall not apply to any project for which condemnation proceedings have been initiated prior to the date of enactment.

    SEC. 10. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

      It is the policy of the United States to encourage, support, and promote the private ownership of property and to ensure that the constitutional and other legal rights of private property owners are protected by the Federal Government.

    SEC. 11. BROAD CONSTRUCTION.

      This Act shall be construed in favor of a broad protection of private property rights, to the maximum extent permitted by the terms of this Act and the Constitution.

    SEC. 12. LIMITATION ON STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.

      Nothing in this Act may be construed to supersede, limit, or otherwise affect any provision of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.).

    SEC. 13. RELIGIOUS AND NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

      (a) Prohibition on States- No State or political subdivision of a State shall exercise its power of eminent domain, or allow the exercise of such power by any person or entity to which such power has been delegated, over property of a religious or other nonprofit organization by reason of the nonprofit or tax-exempt status of such organization, or any quality related thereto if that State or political subdivision receives Federal economic development funds during any fiscal year in which it does so.

      (b) Ineligibility for Federal Funds- A violation of subsection (a) by a State or political subdivision shall render such State or political subdivision ineligible for any Federal economic development funds for a period of 2 fiscal years following a final judgment on the merits by a court of competent jurisdiction that such subsection has been violated, and any Federal agency charged with distributing those funds shall withhold them for such 2-year period, and any such funds distributed to such State or political subdivision shall be returned or reimbursed by such State or political subdivision to the appropriate Federal agency or authority of the Federal Government, or component thereof.

      (c) Prohibition on Federal Government- The Federal Government or any authority of the Federal Government shall not exercise its power of eminent domain over property of a religious or other nonprofit organization by reason of the nonprofit or tax-exempt status of such organization, or any quality related thereto.

    SEC. 14. REPORT BY FEDERAL AGENCIES ON REGULATIONS AND PROCEDURES RELATING TO EMINENT DOMAIN.

      Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the head of each Executive department and agency shall review all rules, regulations, and procedures and report to the Attorney General on the activities of that department or agency to bring its rules, regulations and procedures into compliance with this Act.

    SEC. 15. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

      It is the sense of Congress that any and all precautions shall be taken by the government to avoid the unfair or unreasonable taking of property away from survivors of Hurricane Katrina who own, were bequeathed, or assigned such property, for economic development purposes or for the private use of others.

    Passed the House of Representatives November 3, 2005.

    Attest:

    Clerk.


    Related coverage:

  • Sept. 2005: "U.S. Conference of Mayors" Fighting Remedial Legislation Protecting Property Owners From Eminent Domain Consequences Following Supreme Court Ruling

  • Aug. 2005: Editorial: Stopping Stealth Advocacy On Eminent Domain

    Return To Front Page

    Contact us: mail@LBReport.com


  • DrainPros
    DrainPros: Unclog Drains + Full Service Plumbing, Locally Owned Pros. Info, Click Here

    Mike & Kathi Kowal
    Mike & Kathi Kowal know Los Cerritos, Bixby Knolls, Cal Hts. and beyond. Click to learn more

    Lovelace Feb 05
    Wedding Entertainment Planning Is His Specialty. Bill Lovelace Delivers Personalized, Wedding Event Services. Get Info, Click Here

    Jax Bicycle Center
    Jax Bicycle Center. Huge bike choice + everything you need for a great ride.

    NetKontent
    Preserve Your Family's Most Precious Photos and Videos on DVD. Click For Info

    Carter Wood Floor pic
    Carter Wood Floors, a LB company, will restore your wood floor or install a new one. Enhance your home. Click pic.

    Your E-Mail To Us
    Click here

    Copyright © 2005 LBReport.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use/Legal policy, click here. Privacy Policy, click here