News
710 Fwy "Tier 2 Advisory Committee" Unveils 80-Page Report; Vice-Chair of Gateway Council of Gov'ts' Oversight Policy Committee Responds
(October 7, 2004) -- On September 30, 2004, the Oversight Policy Committee (OPC) of the Gateway Cities Council of Governments (Gateway COG) met in Carson. The OPC, co-chaired by LB Councilman Frank Colonna, will ultimately decide on what policies and plans will be followed as part of a massive project to increase the capacity of the I-710 freeway.
At the Sept. 30 meeting, members of the Tier 2 Community Advisory Committee unveiled a report remarkable in its scope and content. The Committee's report said its "guiding principles define the priorities of the Tier 2 Committee and reflect the consensus that emerged during this process." [emphasis follows in original]
1. This is a corridor -- considerations go beyond the freeway and infrastructure.
2. Health is the overriding consideration.
3. Every action should be viewed as an opportunity for repair and
improvement of the current situation.
...[T]he I-710 corridor is more than just a place for trucks to pass through on their way to their final destination. It is the location of our homes, businesses, schools, parks, and lives. Today, particulates and other pollutants from diesel truck traffic in the I-710 Corridor and the ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles are our communities’ primary air-quality-related health concern. Therefore, the conditions for major infrastructure improvements must be as follows: [emphasis in original]
1. Implement a corridor level action plan to improve community air quality.
2. Major infrastructure improvements must be conditioned on achieving air
quality goals to protect public health; corridor air quality must comply with
county, state and federal standards prior to the start of mainline construction
and the entire project taken as a whole must result in a net reduction in criteria
pollutants.
3. Prior to the initiation of the environmental review process, all Tier 1
Community Advisory Committees must have formally endorsed the freeway
improvement design concept.
4. Prior to adopting a preferred alternative the OPC must conduct a study and
cost benefit analysis of potential goods movement alternatives as an
alternative to increasing the capacity of the I-710 Freeway.
5. A study of the impact of construction on air quality, traffic, congestion, noise
and impact on surrounding communities must be conducted, and if
construction does go forward, specific mitigation plans must be developed and
put into effect during the construction process to minimize and mitigate the
impact of construction on the surrounding communities.
6. Major infrastructure improvements must be conditioned on achieving a net
decrease in noise impacts upon the affected communities.
LBReport.com posts extended excerpts of the Tier 2 Committee Report Executive Summary below, plus a link to the full 80 page document thereafter.
So...what will the OPC do in response to these and other similarly stirring recommendations? LBReport.com has learned the Tier 2 report is tentatively set to appear on the October 28 meeting of the OPC.
On October 6, LBReport.com attended a joint meeting of the COG's Board of Directors and Executive Committee, at which the Tier 2 Report was agendized to be received and filed. Those present included Sam Peña, Vice Mayor of Maywood, who co-chairs the OPC with LB Councilman Colonna. (Councilman Colonna wasn't present at the Oct. 6 meeting).
After the meeting, we took the opportunity to ask Vice Mayor Peña what he thinks of the Tier 2 Report. Here's what he told us:
Vice Mayor Peña: In order to move this process along, I think both the OPC and the Tier 2 Advisory Committee have to realize that we all have to come to the table together and just say, you know what, we need to get this done. I think taking an ostrich approach to public policy and putting your head into the sand and saying, 'We don't want to do anything" and it never works that way.
And us as elected officials have to take on the responsibility of doing something about this.
LBReport.com: Well, they've produced this report. They apparently are taking this seriously, so you guys are agendizing it on the 28th [of October]
Vice Mayor Peña: We're agendizing it on the 28th and as you see in the report that came out [presented at the Oct. 6 COG meeting by Dr. John Husing, Ph.D., report for So. Cal Ass'n of Gov'ts, "Logistics & Distribution: An Answer to Regional Upward Social Mobility"] today on the study by Dr. Husing is, some of these numbers are staggering. Some of these numbers, they're projected numbers, are ahead of schedule. So for us to say that, you know what, we've got to take this really slow because [of] air quality issues, air quality are there, they're excruciatingly important in our area. We've got the highest rates for air pollution, cancer in our area alone. Extremely important, but at the same time, these issues are not going to go away by us not doing anything about it.
So we all have to come together and say what's the best solution for this? What is the best solution?
And I think that the hybrid that the Technical Committee put together, it's a great start. Do we have to tweak it? Yes, we have to tweak it. I think it's, like I said, I think it's a matter of all of us coming to the table together.
Vice Mayor Peña will be chairing the October 28 OPC meeting. (Colonna and Peña alternate chairing meetings as OPC co-chairs).
Excerpts of the Tier 2 Committee report follow, along with a hyperlink to the full 80 page report.
[begin text]
Excerpts from I - 710 / MAJOR CORRIDOR STUDY
Tier 2 Community Advisory Committee
Major Opportunity/Strategy Recommendations and Conditions
August, 2004
TIER 2 COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Glenna J. Amos*
City of South Gate
Harold Arsenian*
City of Vernon
Dr. Ed Avol
USC School of Medicine
Hamid Bahadori
Automobile Club of Southern
California
Gerald Burgess*
City of Paramount
Victor Caballero*
City of Huntington Park
Gustavo Camacho*
East Los Angeles
Malcolm Carson
Legal Aid Foundation of Los
Angeles
Roberto Chavez*
City of Compton
Louis Diaz
International Brotherhood of
Teamsters
Clifford Dunbar*
City of Bell Gardens
Bob Eula*
City of Commerce
Belinda Faustinos
San Gabriel and Lower Los
Angeles Rivers and Mountains
Conservancy
Larry Galvan*
City of Cudahy
Julie C. Gonzalez*
City of Bell
Steve Goodling
Long Beach Area Convention
and Visitors Bureau
Patricia Herrera*
City of Long Beach
Roger Holman*
City of Long Beach
Alan Hose*
City of Long Beach
Tom Houston*
City of Compton
Randy Kendrick
City of Bell
Bobbi Kimble*
City of Long Beach
Angelo Logan
Coalition for Environmental
Health and Justice
Dr. Joseph Magaddino
California State University at
Long Beach
Mandy McLaughlin*
City of Compton
Dr. Domenick Miretti
Marine Clerks Association
Dr. Elisa Nicholas
Long Beach Alliance for
Children with Asthma
Harold Omel*
City of Long Beach
Servando Ornelas*
East Los Angeles
Bill Pagett
Technical Advisory Committee
Chair
Noel Park
San Pedro Peninsula
Homeowners Coalition
Ray Park*
City of Carson
Luis Romero*
City of Maywood
Patty Senecal
Transport Express
Harold Tseklenis*
City of Downey
Linda Vitale*
City of Long Beach
Rod White*
City of Lynwood
Harold Williams
South Bay Council of
Governments
*Designated Tier 1 Community Advisory Committee Member representing corridor communities.
Note: Some communities had a change in representatives during the process
Executive Summary
INTRODUCTION
This report presents the final consensus resulting from nine months of deliberations by a
broad-based group appointed by I-710 corridor communities and the I-710 Oversight
Policy Committee. Known as the Tier 2 Committee, this group represented a broad base
of interests, including local communities, academic, environmental, business, community
and environmental justice. The most directly impacted communities in the corridor were
invited to form community-level committees (known as the Tier 1 Committees). The
chairs of these committees were also represented on the Tier 2 Committee, along with a
representative named by each City Council in the remaining corridor cities.
The following guiding principles define the priorities of the Tier 2 Committee and reflect
the consensus that emerged during this process:
1. This is a corridor -- considerations go beyond the freeway and
infrastructure.
2. Health is the overriding consideration.
3. Every action should be viewed as an opportunity for repair and
improvement of the current situation.
The Committee recognizes that something must be done to address the current congestion
and design of the I-710 freeway. The high number of trucks on the freeway uses up
capacity and the mix of cars and trucks poses a serious safety concern. The committee
agrees that the hybrid design concept presented could accomplish maximum build out in
a manner that reflects the Tier 1 CACs’ concerns and recommendations for their
communities, with the exception of the City of Commerce and East Los Angeles area,
which require further study. However, the I-710 corridor is more than just a place for
trucks to pass through on their way to their final destination. It is the location of our
homes, businesses, schools, parks, and lives. Today, particulates and other pollutants
from diesel truck traffic in the I-710 Corridor and the ports of Long Beach and Los
Angeles are our communities’ primary air-quality-related health concern. Therefore, the
conditions for major infrastructure improvements must be as follows:
1. Implement a corridor level action plan to improve community air quality.
2. Major infrastructure improvements must be conditioned on achieving air
quality goals to protect public health; corridor air quality must comply with
county, state and federal standards prior to the start of mainline construction
and the entire project taken as a whole must result in a net reduction in criteria
pollutants.
3. Prior to the initiation of the environmental review process, all Tier 1
Community Advisory Committees must have formally endorsed the freeway
improvement design concept.
4. Prior to adopting a preferred alternative the OPC must conduct a study and
cost benefit analysis of potential goods movement alternatives as an
alternative to increasing the capacity of the I-710 Freeway.
5. A study of the impact of construction on air quality, traffic, congestion, noise
and impact on surrounding communities must be conducted, and if
construction does go forward, specific mitigation plans must be developed and
put into effect during the construction process to minimize and mitigate the
impact of construction on the surrounding communities.
6. Major infrastructure improvements must be conditioned on achieving a net
decrease in noise impacts upon the affected communities.
The Committee recognizes that certain aspects of the design concepts, particularly for
designated on-ramps, may be appropriate for implementation prior to addressing the
"mainline" issues. However, these improvements cannot be constructed in isolation from
all of the other recommendations such as public health, community enhancement, and
noise abatement. The I-710 design must take into account the safety and quality of life of
the communities in the corridor, including provisions for greenbelts and open space...
HEALTH
Air quality is the number one public health issue. Poor air quality has had significant
negative impacts on public, economic, environmental and community health in the
corridor. Particulates and other pollutants from diesel truck traffic in the I-710 Corridor
and the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach are our communities’ primary air-qualityrelated
health concern. The first consideration for approval of any improvements within
the I-710 corridor must be the project’s ability to reduce air quality impacts. Therefore,
these steps must be taken before construction can begin on the “mainline” project to
reduce air pollution.
The Tier 2 Committee recommends the following air quality improvement strategies:
1. Develop an action plan to improve air quality in the corridor.
2. Implement a corridor level action plan to improve community air quality.
3. Implement local alternative fuels/electrification and/or hydrogen policies and
programs to reduce diesel emissions.
4. Pursue opportunities for incremental improvements.
5. Implement port-specific air quality improvement strategies.
...
SAFETY
The I-710 corridor is one of the most unsafe freeways in the State. Increasing truck
traffic, conflicts between cars and trucks, aging infrastructure, and outdated design are all
contributing causes to accidents in and around the freeway. The high concentration of
older trucks, which frequently become disabled, poses a significant safety hazard, as do
truck intrusions into nearby communities and neighborhoods. Just as the Alameda
Corridor helped reduce conflicts between trains and automobiles, any improvements to
the I-710 corridor must resolve the inherent conflicts between automobiles and trucks.
The Tier 2 Committee recommends the following safety improvement strategies:
1. Continue support and implementation of safety programs.
2. Increase enforcement of traffic and vehicle safety laws and regulations.
3. Increase public and trucker education on safety and neighborhood issues.
4. Implement infrastructure improvements.
5. Separate trucks and cars.
NOISE
Excessive noise is a serious public health concern in the corridor and cannot be resolved
by simply building more sound walls. A comprehensive analysis of noise along the
corridor must lead to a plan that recognizes the health impacts to our communities and
seeks to resolve those impacts by providing appropriate relief. Major infrastructure
improvements must be conditioned on achieving a net decrease in noise impact upon the
affected communities.
The Tier 2 Committee recommends the following noise control strategies:
1. Provide appropriate and effective sound walls to reduce noise impacts to
neighborhoods and schools adjacent to the freeway.
2. Implement noise mitigation programs.
3. Conduct a study to assess how truck traffic from extended gate hours for
trucks and 24/7 port operations will impact communities, and assess what
mitigations may be appropriate.
...
ORGANIZATION AND PROCESS
To ensure that the work of the Tier 2 Committee is carried forward as set forth in the full
report, a task force of representatives from the Tier 2 CAC, the OPC and the TAC should
be established to plan and oversee the implementation of the conditions and
recommendations of the Tier 2 CAC.
The Tier 2 Committee recommends the following organization and process strategies:
1. This Tier 2 Report will be formally "agendized" and presented to the OPC
when it convenes in September 2004 for its consideration and decision. All
Tier 2 members will be invited to the OPC meeting, and the presentation of
the Tier 2 report will be delivered by a representative group of Tier 2
spokespersons.
2. Following the OPC’s meeting, there will be a follow-up meeting(s) of the Tier
2 Committee to discuss actions taken by the OPC.
3. Prior to the beginning of any formal EIR for the I-710 Major Corridor Study,
Metro (MTA) and the Gateway Cities COG will work with the communities,
appropriate agencies, organizations and community groups in developing a
collaborative process for community participation in the environmental review
process. This process will continue to work collaboratively throughout the
EIR process.
CONCLUSIONS AND NEXT STEPS
This report is hereby presented by the Tier 2 CAC to the I-710 Oversight Policy
Committee. The Committee expects that its recommendations will be carried forward by
the OPC, the Gateway Cities COG, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation
Authority (Metro), the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and the
California State Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Further, we expect our
recommendations to be used as required guidance in the planning and development of
future corridor improvements. The Committee and the communities we represent expect
to have continued formal and meaningful participation in the I-710 corridor improvement
process and look forward to working with the OPC and future project sponsors toward an
improved and revitalized I-710 Corridor.
The full 80 page report can be viewed at: Tier 2 Advisory Committee Final Report (pdf file)
Return To Front Page
Contact us: mail@LBReport.com
|