News in Depth/Perspective YIYBYs ("Yes In Your Backyard"): State Legislature Passes (With Support From Sen. Lowenthal & Ass'ymembers Karnette & Oropeza) Bill Mandating Cities Find Areas & Zone For Share Of Region's Low Income Housing, Homeless Shelters, Transitional Housing
Makes City Hall Denial Harder, Includes Minimum Densities & Penalties/Lawsuit Exposure For Non-Compliance
(Sept. 4, 2006) -- State Senator Alan Lowenthal (D., LB-SP-PV) and Assemblymembers Betty Karnette (D., LB) and Jenny Oropeza (D., Carson-LB) voted for a bill -- which passed the State Senate and Assembly is now on the Governor's desk -- limiting the ability of City Halls to deny permits to homeless shelters, transitional/special needs housing and group homes...and mandating that cities allocate and zone certain areas for such facilities by right or by conditional use permit.
SB 1322 by state Senator Gil Cedillo (D., L.A) mandates that cities and counties include in their General Plan's Housing Element an analysis of the need for such facilities [their share of a so-called "regional housing need"] and accommodate that need in areas zoned to permit such uses by right or by conditional use permit. It also adds "special needs facilities" to CA's existing anti-NIMBY law that limits City Halls' ability to deny or condition a project.
The legislation prescribes minimum densities that cities must allow to accommodate the regional "housing need" for such facilities...which supporters dubbed a "fair share." But the bill also lets communities avoid their "fair share" by adopting and implementing a so-called "multijurisdictional agreement with adjacent communities that commits the participating jurisdictions to identify sufficient sites suitable for development within the planning period of emergency shelters that are zoned to permit the development of these shelters as a use by right.
The bill was opposed by the League of CA Cities (in which LB City Hall is a member)...which posted an alert on its website urging cities to oppose the measure. Sen. Lowenthal and Assemblywoman [State Senate candidate] Oropeza voted for the bill although both are former members of the LB City Council.
Final passage in the Senate and Assembly came on August 31...the last day for votes on pending bills. SB 1322 is now on the desk of Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who has thirty days in which to sign it into law, let it become law without his signature...or veto it.
Under current law, the housing element of a City or County's general plan must include (among other things) a program with a five-year schedule of actions that the local government
is undertaking or intends to undertake to implement the goals and objectives of the housing element, including a requirement to provide for sufficient sites with zoning that permits owner-occupied and rental multifamily residential use by right.
SB 1322 would add emergency shelters and transitional housing to these provisions and revise requirements by which City Hall may identify sites suitable for the development of emergency shelters. It would require local governments to designate zones where special needs facilities and transitional housing are a permitted use, either by right or subject to a conditional use permit.
SB 1322 would curtail City Halls' discretion regarding facilities with seven or more people...and doesn't cap this number (treating a proposed 200 bed facility in the same way as an eight bed facility).
A Senate legislative analysis of the SB 1322 states in pertinent part:
This bill:
1.Adds emergency shelters to the list of types of housing
for which a local government must identify adequate sites
in its housing element.
2.Requires the housing element to include an inventory of
sites suitable for the development within the planning
period of emergency shelters and requires these sites to
be zoned to permit shelters as a use by right.
3.Requires the city or county to identify and rezone
sufficient sites to accommodate the need for emergency
shelters if the inventory does not identify adequate
sites to accommodate the community's need as identified
in the analysis and requires rezoned sites to permit
emergency shelters as a use by right.
4.Allows a local government to satisfy the requirement to
identify sites for emergency shelters through a
multijurisdictional agreement with adjacent communities.
5.Allows a city or county to comply with the requirements
of this bill during the next regular update cycle of
their housing element.
6.Defines emergency shelter as housing for homeless
persons that is limited to occupancy of six months or
less, consistent with the existing law definition in the
Health and Safety Code.
7.Requires the analysis of special housing needs within
the housing element to address transitional housing.
8.Defines transitional housing as housing with supportive
services for up to 24 months that is exclusively
designated and targeted for recently homeless persons,
consistent with the existing law definition in the Health
and Safety Code.
9.Requires cities and counties to designate zones where
special needs facilities and transitional housing are a
permitted use, either by right or subject to a
conditional use permit.
10.Prohibits a local agency from enacting or enforcing an
ordinance, regulation, or resolution prohibiting special
needs facilities and transitional housing.
11.Defines special needs facility as any of the following
that serve seven or more persons, consistent with
existing law definitions in the Health and Safety Code: a
community care facility, residential facility, social
rehabilitation facility, community treatment facility,
transitional shelter care facility, transitional housing
placement facility, residential care facility, or
residential care facility for the elderly.
12.Amends the anti-NIMBY (for "not in my back yard") law
to:
- A. Apply the law to emergency shelters and special
needs facilities.
- B. Prohibit a community from using the "not-needed"
defense to disapprove transitional housing unless the
community has met the need for such facilities
identified in its housing element analysis of special
housing needs.
Opponents (mainly Republicans) charged that the bill runs counter to local control, but supporters (mainly Democrats) denied this, saying the bill lets City Councils make required findings locally. You decide: we post salient portions of the text below:
The housing element shall consist of an identification and
analysis of existing and projected housing needs and a statement of
goals, policies, quantified objectives, financial resources, and
scheduled programs for the preservation, improvement, and development
of housing. The housing element shall identify adequate sites for
housing, including rental housing, factory-built housing,
mobilehomes, and emergency shelters, and shall make adequate
provision for the existing and projected needs of all economic
segments of the community. The element shall contain all of the
following:
(a) An assessment of housing needs and an inventory of resources
and constraints relevant to the meeting of these needs. The
assessment and inventory shall include all of the following:
(1) An analysis of population and employment trends and
documentation of projections and a quantification of the locality's
existing and projected housing needs for all income levels. These
existing and projected needs shall include the locality's share of
the regional housing need in accordance with Section 65584.
(2) An analysis and documentation of household characteristics,
including level of payment compared to ability to pay, housing
characteristics, including overcrowding, and housing stock condition.
(3) An inventory of land suitable for residential development,
including vacant sites and sites having potential for redevelopment,
and an analysis of the relationship of zoning and public facilities
and services to these sites.
(4) An analysis of potential and actual governmental constraints
upon the maintenance, improvement, or development of housing for all
income levels and for persons with disabilities as identified in the
analysis pursuant to paragraph (6), including land use controls,
building codes and their enforcement, site improvements, fees and
other exactions required of developers, and local processing and
permit procedures. The analysis shall also demonstrate local efforts
to remove governmental constraints that hinder the locality from
meeting its share of the regional housing need in accordance with
Section 65584 and from meeting the need for housing for persons with
disabilities identified pursuant to paragraph (6).
(5) An analysis of potential and actual nongovernmental
constraints upon the maintenance, improvement, or development of
housing for all income levels, including the availability of
financing, the price of land, and the cost of construction.
(6) An analysis of any special housing needs, such as those of the
elderly, persons with disabilities, large families, farmworkers,
families with female heads of households, and families and persons in
need of emergency shelter.
(7) An inventory of sites suitable for the development within the
planning period of emergency shelters that are zoned to permit the
development of these shelters as a use by right, as defined in
subdivision (i) of Section 65583.2. The sites shall be zoned with
appropriate development and management standards and served with
appropriate infrastructure to accommodate the community's need for
emergency shelters identified pursuant to paragraph (6).
***************
...[A] city or county shall determine whether each site in the inventory can accommodate some portion of its share of the regional housing need by income level during the planning period...The analysis shall determine whether the inventory can provide for a variety of types of housing, including multifamily rental housing, factory-built housing, mobilehomes, housing for agricultural employees, emergency shelters, and transitional housing. The city or county shall determine the number of housing units that can be accommodated on each site as follows:
For the number of units calculated to accommodate its share of the regional housing need for lower income households...a city or county shall do either of the following:
(A) Provide an analysis demonstrating how the adopted densities accommodate this need. The analysis shall include, but is not limited to, factors such as market demand, financial feasibility, or information based on development project experience within a zone or
zones that provide housing for lower income households.
(B) The following densities shall be deemed appropriate to accommodate housing for lower income households:
(iii) For suburban jurisdictions: sites allowing at least 20 units
per acre.
(iv) For jurisdictions in metropolitan counties: sites allowing at
least 30 units per acre.
...(e) A jurisdiction is considered suburban if the jurisdiction does
not meet the requirements of [citation] and is located in a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) of less than 2,000,000 in population, unless that jurisdiction's population is greater than 100,000, in which case it is considered metropolitan...
...For sites described in [citation] the city or county shall specify the additional development potential for each site within the planning period and shall provide an
explanation of the methodology used to determine the development potential. The methodology shall consider factors including the extent to which existing uses may constitute an impediment to additional residential development, development trends, market
conditions, and regulatory or other incentives or standards to
encourage additional residential development on these sites.
...The program required by [citation] shall accommodate 100 percent of the
need for housing for very low and low-income households allocated pursuant to [citation] for which site capacity has not been identified in the inventory of sites pursuant to [citation] on sites that shall be zoned to permit owner-occupied and rental multifamily residential use by right during the planning period. These sites shall be zoned with minimum density and development standards that permit at least 16 units per site at a density of at least 16 units per acre in jurisdictions described in [citation] and at least 20 units per acre in jurisdictions described in [citation].
(c). At least 50 percent of the very low and low-income housing need shall be accommodated on sites designated for residential use and for which nonresidential uses or mixed-uses are not permitted.
(i) ...[T]he phrase "use by right" shall mean that the local government's review of the use for an emergency shelter or an owner-occupied or rental multifamily residential development may not require a conditional use permit, planned unit development permit, or other discretionary local government review or approval that would constitute a "project" for purposes of [citation]...
Supporters said the bill requires cities to take their "fair share" of such facilities...but it actually includes a de facto escape clause, letting some communities, in effect. send their "fair share" to other communities as part of a so-called "multijurisdictional agreement."
A local government may satisfy the requirements to identify
sites suitable for the development of emergency shelters pursuant to paragraph (7) of subdivision (a) and to include a program to identify sufficient sites for these shelters pursuant to subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) by adopting and implementing a multijurisdictional agreement with adjacent communities that commits the participating jurisdictions to identify sufficient sites suitable for development within the planning period of emergency shelters that are zoned to permit the development of these shelters as a use
by right, as defined in subdivision (i) of Section 65583.2. The sites shall be zoned with appropriate development and management standards and served with appropriate infrastructure to accommodate the combined need for emergency shelters of all the participating jurisdictions, as identified by each jurisdiction pursuant to paragraph (6) of subdivision (a).
The bill's language is mainly mandatory...and exposes City Halls [local taxpayers] to lawsuits by developers and project applicants...including so-called "bad faith" penalties and other litigation costs. Some excerpts:
(d) A local agency shall not disapprove a housing development
project...for very low, low-, or moderate-income households, a special needs facility, or an
emergency shelter, or condition approval, including through the use of design review standards, in a manner that renders the project infeasible for development for the use of very low, low-, or moderate-income households, a special needs facility, or an emergency
shelter unless it makes written findings, based upon substantial evidence in the record, as to one of the following:
(1) The jurisdiction has adopted a housing element pursuant to
this article that has been revised in accordance with Section 65588,
is in substantial compliance with this article, and the jurisdiction
has met or exceeded its share of the regional housing need allocation
pursuant to Section 65584 for the planning period for the income
category proposed for the housing development project...
(2) The development project, special needs facility, or emergency
shelter as proposed would have a specific, adverse impact upon the
public health or safety, and there is no feasible method to
satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact without
rendering the development unaffordable to low- and moderate-income
households or rendering the development of the special needs facility
or emergency shelter financially infeasible. As used in this
paragraph, a "specific, adverse impact" means a significant,
quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective,
identified written public health or safety standards, policies, or
conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed
complete. Inconsistency with the zoning ordinance or general plan
land use designation shall not constitute a specific, adverse impact
upon the public health or safety.
(3) The denial of the project or imposition of conditions is
required in order to comply with specific state or federal law, and
there is no feasible method to comply without rendering the
development unaffordable to low- and moderate-income households or
rendering the development of the special needs facility or emergency
shelter financially infeasible. ,,,
...(5) The development project, special needs facility, or emergency
shelter is inconsistent with both the jurisdiction's zoning ordinance
and general plan land use designation as specified in any element of
the general plan as it existed on the date the application was
deemed complete, and the jurisdiction has adopted a revised housing
element in accordance with Section 65588 that is in substantial
compliance with this article.
(A) This paragraph cannot be utilized to disapprove or
conditionally approve a housing development project if the
development project is proposed on a site that is identified as
suitable or available for very low, low-, or moderate-income
households in the jurisdiction's housing element, and consistent with
the density specified in the housing element, even though it is
inconsistent with both the jurisdiction's zoning ordinance and
general plan land use designation. This paragraph cannot be utilized
to disapprove or conditionally approve an emergency shelter if the
shelter is proposed on a site that is identified as suitable for
emergency shelters in the housing element, even though it is
inconsistent with both the jurisdiction's zoning ordinance and
general plan land use designation.
(B) If the local agency has failed, in accordance with Section
65583.2, to identify in the inventory of land in its housing element
sites that can be developed for housing within the planning period
and that are sufficient to provide for the jurisdiction's share of
the regional housing need for all income levels pursuant to Section
65584, then this paragraph shall not be utilized to disapprove or
conditionally approve a housing development project proposed for a
site designated in any element of the general plan for residential
uses or designated in any element of the general plan for commercial
uses if residential uses are permitted or conditionally permitted
within commercial designations. In any action in court, the burden
of proof shall be on the local agency to show that its housing
element does identify adequate sites with appropriate zoning and
development standards and with services and facilities to accommodate
the local agency's share of the regional housing need for the very
low and low-income categories.
(f) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a local
agency from requiring the housing development project, special needs
facility, or emergency shelter to comply with objective,
quantifiable, written development standards, conditions, and policies
appropriate to, and consistent with, meeting the jurisdiction's
share of the regional housing need pursuant to Section 65584. A local
agency may also require special needs facilities and emergency
shelters to comply with objective, quantifiable, written management
standards. However, the development and management standards,
conditions, and policies shall be applied to facilitate and
accommodate development at the density permitted on the site and
proposed by housing development project, special needs facility, or
emergency shelter. Nothing in this section shall be construed to
prohibit a local agency from imposing fees and other exactions
otherwise authorized by law that are essential to provide necessary
public services and facilities to housing development project,
special needs facility, or emergency shelter.
(g) This section shall be applicable to charter cities because the
Legislature finds that the lack of housing is a critical statewide
problem.
(h) The following definitions apply for the purposes of this
section:
(1) "Feasible" means capable of being accomplished in a successful
manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account
economic, environmental, social, and technological factors.
(2) "Housing development project" means a use consisting of either
of the following:
(A) Residential units only.
(B) Mixed-use developments consisting of residential and
nonresidential uses in which nonresidential uses are limited to
neighborhood commercial uses and to the first floor of buildings that
are two or more stories. As used in this paragraph, "neighborhood
commercial" means small-scale general or specialty stores that
furnish goods and services primarily to residents of the
neighborhood.
(3) "Housing for very low, low-, or moderate-income households"
means that either (A) at least 20 percent of the total units shall be
sold or rented to lower income households, as defined in Section
50079.5 of the Health and Safety Code, or (B) 100 percent of the
units shall be sold or rented to moderate-income households as
defined in Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code, or
middle-income households, as defined in Section 65008 of this code.
Housing units targeted for lower income households shall be made
available at a monthly housing cost that does not exceed 30 percent
of 60 percent of area median income with adjustments for household size made in accordance
with the adjustment factors on which the lower income eligibility
limits are based. Housing units targeted for persons and families of
moderate income shall be made available at a monthly housing cost
that does not exceed 30 percent of 100 percent of area median income
with adjustments for household size made in accordance with the
adjustment factors on which the moderate income eligibility limits
are based.
(4) "Special needs facility" includes all of the following if the
facility is licensed and serves seven or more persons:
(A) A "community care facility," "residential facility," "social
rehabilitation facility," "community treatment facility,"
"transitional shelter care facility," and "transitional housing
placement facility," as those terms are defined in Section 1502 of
the Health and Safety Code.
(B) A "residential care facility," as defined in Section 1568.01
of the Health and Safety Code.
(C) A "residential care facility for the elderly," as defined in
Section 1569.2 of the Health and Safety Code.
(5) "Area median income" means area median income as periodically
established by the Department of Housing and Community Development
pursuant to Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code. The
developer shall provide sufficient legal commitments to ensure
continued availability of units for very low or low-income households
in accordance with the provisions of this subdivision for 30 years.
(6) "Neighborhood" means a planning area commonly identified in a
community's planning documents, and identified as a neighborhood by
the individuals residing and working within the neighborhood.
Documentation demonstrating that the area meets the definition of
neighborhood may include a map prepared for planning purposes which
lists the name and boundaries of the neighborhood.
(7) "Disapprove the development project" includes any instance in
which a local agency does either of the following:
(A) Votes on a proposed housing development project application
and the application is disapproved.
(B) Fails to comply with the time periods specified in
subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section
65950. An extension of time pursuant to Article 5 (commencing with
Section 65950) shall be deemed to be an extension of time pursuant to
this paragraph.
(i) If any city, county, or city and county denies approval or
imposes restrictions, including design changes, a reduction of
allowable densities or the percentage of a lot that may be occupied
by a building or structure under the applicable planning and zoning
in force at the time the application is deemed complete pursuant to
Section 65943, that have a substantial adverse effect on the
viability or affordability of a housing development for very low,
low-, or moderate-income households, and the denial of the
development or the imposition of restrictions on the development is
the subject of a court action which challenges the denial, then the
burden of proof shall be on the local legislative body to show that
its decision is consistent with the findings as described in
subdivision (d) and that the findings are supported by substantial
evidence in the record.
(j) When a proposed housing development project complies with
applicable, objective general plan and zoning standards and criteria,
including design review standards, in effect at the time that the
housing development project's application is determined to be
complete, but the local agency proposes to disapprove the project or
to approve it upon the condition that the project be developed at a
lower density, the local agency shall base its decision regarding the
proposed housing development project upon written findings supported
by substantial evidence on the record that both of the following
conditions exist:
(1) The housing development project would have a specific, adverse
impact upon the public health or safety unless the project is
disapproved or approved upon the condition that the project be
developed at a lower density. As used in this paragraph, a "specific,
adverse impact" means a significant, quantifiable, direct, and
unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified written public
health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed
on the date the application was deemed complete.
(2) There is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or
avoid the adverse impact identified pursuant to paragraph (1), other
than the disapproval of the housing development project or the
approval of the project upon the condition that it be developed at a
lower density.
(k) The applicant or any person who would be eligible to apply for
residency in the development, special needs facility, or emergency
shelter may bring an action to enforce this section. If in any action
brought to enforce the provisions of this section, a court finds
that the local agency disapproved a project or conditioned its
approval in a manner rendering it infeasible for the development of a
special needs facility, emergency shelter, or housing for very low,
low-, or moderate-income households, including farmworker housing,
without making the findings required by this section or without
making sufficient findings supported by substantial evidence, the
court shall issue an order or judgment compelling compliance with
this section within 60 days, including, but not limited to, an order
that the local agency take action on the development project, special
needs facility, or emergency shelter. The court shall retain
jurisdiction to ensure that its order or judgment is carried out and
shall award reasonable attorney's fees and costs of suit to the
plaintiff or petitioner who proposed the housing development, special
needs facility, or emergency shelter, except under extraordinary
circumstances in which the court finds that awarding fees would not
further the purposes of this section. If the court determines that
its order or judgment has not been carried out within 60 days, the
court may issue further orders as provided by law to ensure that the
purposes and policies of this section are fulfilled, including, but
not limited to, an order to vacate the decision of the local agency,
in which case the application for the project, as constituted at the
time the local agency took the initial action determined to be in
violation of this section, along with any standard conditions
determined by the court to be generally imposed by the local agency
on similar projects, shall be deemed approved unless the applicant
consents to a different decision or action by the local agency.
(l) If the court finds that the local agency (1) acted in bad
faith when it disapproved or conditionally approved the housing
development, special needs facility, or emergency shelter in
violation of this section and (2) failed to carry out the court's
order or judgment within 60 days as described in paragraph (k), the
court in addition to any other remedies provided by this section, may
impose fines upon the local agency that the local agency shall be
required to deposit into a housing trust fund. Fines shall not be
paid from funds that are already dedicated for affordable housing,
including, but not limited to, redevelopment or low- and
moderate-income housing funds and federal HOME and CDBG funds. The
local agency shall commit the money in the trust fund within five
years for the sole purpose of financing newly constructed housing
units affordable to extremely low, very low, or low-income
households. For purposes of this section, "bad faith" shall mean an
action that is frivolous or otherwise entirely without merit.
(m) Any action brought to enforce the provisions of this section
shall be brought pursuant to Section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil
Procedure, and the local agency shall prepare and certify the record
of proceedings in accordance with subdivision (c) of Section 1094.6
of the Code of Civil Procedure no later than 30 days after the
petition is served, provided that the cost of preparation of the
record shall be borne by the local agency. Upon entry of the trial
court's order, a party shall, in order to obtain appellate review of
the order, file a petition within 20 days after service upon it of a
written notice of the entry of the order, or within such further time
not exceeding an additional 20 days as the trial court may for good
cause allow. If the local agency appeals the judgment of the trial
court, the local agency shall post a bond, in an amount to be
determined by the court, to the benefit of the plaintiff if the
plaintiff is the project applicant.
(n) In any action, the record of the proceedings before the local
agency shall be filed as expeditiously as possible and,
notwithstanding Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure or
subdivision (m) of this section, all or part of the record may be
prepared (1) by the petitioner with the petition or petitioner's
points and authorities, (2) by the respondent with respondent's
points and authorities, (3) after payment of costs by the petitioner,
or (4) as otherwise directed by the court. If the expense of
preparing the record has been borne by the petitioner and the
petitioner is the prevailing party, the expense shall be taxable as
costs.
SB 1322 doesn't specify exactly where facilities would be located, but it was joined to two other bills (AB 2634 and AB 2511) that contain provisions making it harder for City Halls to say no to such facilities.
Below are the recorded votes on SB 1322 on final passage (Assembly passage and Senate concurrence in the Assembly amendments):
Assembly final passage
MEASURE: SB 1322
AUTHOR: Cedillo
TOPIC: Housing.
DATE: 08/31/2006
LOCATION: ASM. FLOOR
MOTION: SB 1322 Cedillo Senate Third Reading By Lieber
(AYES 41. NOES 34.) (PASS)
AYES
****
Arambula Baca Bass Berg
Bermudez Calderon Canciamilla Chan
Chavez Cohn Coto De La Torre
Dymally Frommer Goldberg Hancock
Jerome Horton Jones Karnette Klehs
Koretz Laird Leno Levine
Lieber Liu Matthews Montanez
Mullin Negrete McLeod Oropeza Parra
Ridley-Thomas Ruskin Saldana Salinas
Torrico Umberg Vargas Yee
Nunez
NOES
****
Aghazarian Benoit Blakeslee Bogh
Cogdill Daucher DeVore Emmerson
Evans Garcia Haynes Shirley Horton
Houston Huff Keene La Malfa
La Suer Leslie Lieu Maze
McCarthy Mountjoy Nakanishi Niello
Plescia Richman Sharon Runner Spitzer
Strickland Tran Villines Walters
Wolk Wyland
ABSENT, ABSTAINING, OR NOT VOTING
*********************************
Chu Nation Nava Pavley
Senate final passage
MEASURE:SB 1322
AUTHOR: Cedillo
TOPIC: Housing.
DATE: 08/31/2006
LOCATION: SEN. FLOOR
MOTION: Unfinished Supp 2 SB1322 Cedillo
(AYES 24. NOES 14.) (PASS)
AYES
****
Alarcon Alquist Bowen Cedillo
Chesbro Ducheny Dunn Escutia
Figueroa Florez Kehoe Kuehl
Lowenthal Machado Migden Murray
Ortiz Perata Romero Scott
Simitian Speier Torlakson Vincent
NOES
****
Aanestad Ackerman Ashburn Battin
Cox Denham Dutton Harman
Hollingsworth Maldonado Margett McClintock
Morrow Poochigian
ABSENT, ABSTAINING, OR NOT VOTING
****************
Runner Soto
The bill's full text can be viewed by clicking SB 1322 (final passage).
Return To Front Page
Contact us: mail@LBReport.com
|
Alford's English Gardens Beautifies Area Homes. Learn More, Click Here
Mike & Kathie Kowal know Los Cerritos, Bixby Knolls, Cal Hts. and beyond. Click to learn more
DrainPros: Unclog Drains + Full Service Plumbing, Locally Owned Pros. Info, Click Here
Wedding Entertainment Planning Is His Specialty. Bill Lovelace Delivers Personalized, Wedding Event Services. Get Info, Click Here
Preserve Your Family's Most Precious Photos and Videos on DVD. Click For Info
Carter Wood Floors, a LB company, will restore your wood floor or install a new one. Enhance your home. Click pic.
|