LBReport.com

News

Grassroots On-Line Petition Launched: "We Want a Larger Police Force -- NOT A Shrinking One"


VIDEO TELLS AMECO SOLAR'S STORY. AND CLICK HERE TO HEAR AMECO PRESIDENT PATRICK REDGATE EXPLAIN WHY SOLAR MAKES SUCH GOOD SENSE.

(Sept 2, 2012) -- With the City Council poised to vote on either September 4 or September 11 on City Hall's FY13 budget, a grassroots online petition drive has been launched, telling LB's Mayor and City Council, "We want a larger police force -- NOT a shrinking one."

To our knowledge, it is the first collective action by taxpayers since several years of budget votes by the Long Beach City Council (unanimous in September 2009 and 2010 but with dissent in 2011 from Councilmembers Schipske, Neal and Gabelich) cut LBPD's budgets, resulting in a lower citywide deployable police level for the public than when Mayor Ernie Kell exited and Mayor Beverly O'Neill took office in mid-1994.

The petition, authored by Jennifer Gomez, is accessible at this link -- and as of today (Sunday Sept. 2) had garnered 75 signatures. It tells Mayor Foster and Councilmembers:

There are only two weeks left in the FY2013 budget debate. That means now, more than ever, is the time to stand up to protect our neighborhoods from the "new normal."

The City Council and City Manager have taken a step in the right direction by proposing to restore cuts to park programs, libraries and Police Service Specialist functions, but the work is not over.

We advocate for

  • the full restoration of the Police Department Gang Unit,

  • restoration of Fire Department staffing levels

  • support for the City Manager's proposal to save our parks and libraries.

This year's budget proposes further cuts to the police department - $8.7 million - which will result in the loss of 70 more positions, including 40 sworn officers. Over the last 5 years, the City has already lost roughly 200 officers, or 20% of its force. Although a new academy comprised of 40 recruits is proposed, this is a drop in the bucket compared to the overall losses our police department has suffered. This proposed academy is long overdue, and wont even replace the number of officers that are proposed to be cut through attrition this year, since not all cadets are expected to graduate.

This continues to happen against a backdrop of increasing crime, including violent crime and gang activity, and an increased number of offenders being released due to prison overcrowding.

Cutting our police force simply makes no sense. Please support this petition and ask the mayor and city council of Long Beach to restore cuts and GROW, not shrink our police department.

On August 1, 2012 Mayor Bob Foster and City Manager Pat West recommended for that the City Council -- for a fourth year -- continue what the Mayor/Manager call "proportional reductions" that would cut LBPD's budget with the results below. Text within quotations marks is from the City of Long Beach's official budget narrative unless otherwise indicated.

  • Eliminate 40 officers and 32 civiians.

  • Reduce Gang Enforcement among other specialized units
    "Reduce the number of Police Officers assigned to specialized units, including the Gang Enforcement Section Field Unit and the South Division Directed Enforcement Team. This will increase the reliance on the Directed Enforcement Teams of the North, West, and new Central [consolidated South and West] Patrol Division to participate in targeted operations, special details, and handle gang investigations"

  • Cut Investigation Bureau by 29 sworn personnel and nine civilians (both figures "full time equivalent")
    "[I]nvestigative fieldwork will have to be enhanced by first responding Patrol officers. The Police Department will be challenged to continue to maintain its high violent crimes clearance rate with itís [sic] remaining resources..."

  • Longer response times for "non-priority" calls

    "It is anticipated that resources will allow the Department to respond to Priority 1 calls for service in an average of 5.0 minutes or less. Priority 1 calls are potentially life-threatening emergencies, and encompass events which involve life safety such as a shooting or a felonious crime in progress. This level of call for service receives the Police Departmentís fastest response time. The proposed budget will reduce the Patrol Bureau by seven Full Time Equivalent (FTE) sworn and 12.4 FTE civilian positions. It is anticipated that the Patrol Bureau can utilize its remaining personnel to efficiently respond to Priority 1 calls."

  • Acknowledges possible increased crime

    "The FY 13 violent crime rate may be negatively impacted due to the release of over 30,000 inmates from California prisons to improve health care services for remaining inmates, and Police Department staffing reductions."

  • Reduced civilian staffing that will impact investigations, reports and patrol officers' duties
    "Non-sworn positions supporting the Investigations, Patrol, and Support Bureaus will be reduced, which will slow investigations and report preparation. The Jail Division will be restructured to eliminate the Prisoner Transport Unit, with the responsibilities for transport being shifted to Patrol Officers. The Advanced Officer Training curriculum and associated positions will be reduced."

  • Eliminate key outreach and specialized police services support
    "There will no longer be dedicated Divisional crime analysts, Bureau budget analysts, and a broad range of specialized police services support. The responsibilities for those functions will be centralized and will likely result in more work for the remaining staff and a reprioritization of the workload."

  • Use Tidelands Operations Funds to bolster Port Security
    "Enhance port security through the addition of six Police Officers and one Commander, as well as associated supplies, equipment and contractual services. Enhancement is revenue offset through the Police Department MOU with the Harbor Department."

  • Shift some sworn staff to help train recruits for FY13 police recruit Academy class.

Under Mayor Foster, elected in 2006 on a pledge to put 100 more police officers on the street in four years, LBPD reached its highest level of officers available for routine citywide deployment in 2008 with 961 budgeted officers (included six month funding for police academy recruits). However the combined impacts of the fall 2008 economic downturn (which ushered in "The Great Recession") plus pay raises/benefits given to City Hall's three major city employee unions in 2007/2008 contracts without pension reform led City Hall to implement budget cuts that have now shrunk LBPD's budgeted police level for routine citywide deployment to below 800 officers. (LB's police and firefighter unions have agreed to mid-contract pension changes sought by the Mayor/Management; rank and file members of LB's non-public safety union (whose contract runs to 2013) recently declined to agree to similar pension changes.)

LBPD's total officer level, routinely cited by city management, includes roughly 60 officers that LBReport.com acknowledges but doesn't include in our figures above because they aren't available for routine citywide calls for service/deployment and aren't funded by the City Council. These roughly 60 officers are contracted to and paid by the Port, Airport, LB Transit, LBUSD, LBCC, L.A. County/Carmelitos to handle tasks at those sites. None of these officers have been cut...and in FY13 Port proposes to add seven more officers.

The Mayor/Manager proposed FY13 budget includes a roughly 33-member replenishment police academy class (17 recruits budgeted for six months) that would likely graduate after additional attrition expected in the coming months.

Long Beach (L.A. County's second largest city) curently provides its taxpayers with a budgeted per capita police level roughly equivalent to what L.A. would have if its Mayor/City Council cut L.A.P.D.'s officer level by over 25%.

At the August 28 City Council meeting, city management offered the Council a number of budget shifts that would let the Council avert proposed cuts to parks, recreation and library services (responding to public opposition to those cuts). However management didn't include any options for averting the police cuts above...or deal with police overtime that several Councilmembers had previously indicated they believe is understated (low-ball budgeted) in the Mayor/Management proposed FY13 budget.

Councilwoman Gerrie Schipske has formally proposed a package of budget alternatives that would use what the Mayor/Manager call "one time" revenues (combination of oil, parking ticket and Sacramento enabled funds) to avert the proposed cuts to police, fire, parks and libraries, details click here.

Councilmembers Steve Neal and Al Austin have signaled that they believe the Mayor/Management proposed budget underestimates the likely price of oil in FY13 at $65/barrel. If the assumed price were budgeted at $70 barrel, that would avert some police cuts with the caveat that the price of oil has been volatile in previous years and if it falls below $70 a barrel, midyear cuts would be required).

The issues are scheduled to come to the Council's Budget Oversight Committee (DeLong, Lowenthal, O'Donnell) on September 4 at 3:30 p.m. The Committee can make recommendations to the full Council but has no independent power on the matter. Budget decisions are made by a Council majority (five vote minimum) subject to a Mayoral veto which can be overriden by six Council votes.

Developing.



Follow LBReport.com w/

Twitter

RSS

Facebook

Return To Front Page

Contact us: mail@LBReport.com




Presented by
Signal Hill Petroleum

(8:00-10:00 p.m.)
















Carter Wood Floors
Hardwood Floor Specialists
Call (562) 422-2800 or (714) 836-7050





blog comments powered by Disqus

Return To Front Page

Contact us: mail@LBReport.com


Copyright © 2012 LBReport.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use/Legal policy, click here. Privacy Policy, click here