(Sept. 13, 2018, 7:20 p.m.) -- Following-up on a story reported by LBREPORT.com in August, LBREPORT.com has learned that the L.A. County District Attorney's office has responded to an In an August 13 response (provided by the DA's office to LBREPORT.com on request, treated as a Public Records Act matter), Los County DA Head Deputy Alan Yochelson stated: "We take no position" as to whether or the complaint letter's allegations are true, and noted "that 42 U.S.C. section 1983 establishes a civil remedy as opposed to a criminal penalty. As such, a violation of this law is unenforceable in a state criminal proceeding." Mr. Yochelson's letter continued: "[W]ith limited exceptions that do not apply here, the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office prosecutes violations of California law. Therefore, this office has no jurisdiction and cannot institute an investigation." And added: "You may wish to consult with private legal counsel to learn if there are civil remedies available to you. Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention and we are sorry we cannot be of more assistance." The DA's office letter redacted the complainant's name [per standard DA policy] but it's not a secret; the complainant was Nathan Winograd, Director of the No Kill Advocacy Center, who announced his complaint letter when submitted. On August 14, Mr. Winograd submitted additional previous instances of Garcia allegedly hiding Facebook comments and now (under publicized pressure) "unhiding" them, but it didn't change the DA's office's conclusion. [Scroll down for further.] |
In a September 7 Facebook dispatch, Mr. Winograd acknowledged the DA's office conclusion, calling it "unfortunate but not the end of the matter." He wrote in pertinent part:
While the Mayor "unhid" the comments (a total of 56 of them on just two posts), a victory for free speech, the comments were hidden prior to an election in which he was a candidate and the issue of shelter killing was front and center. Unhiding the comments after winning the election is not enough. The next step is to ask the county grand jury to investigate, since their mandate is broader. And failing that, there is also the possibility of filing a lawsuit alleging deprivation of constitutional rights... Mr. Winograd is a Stanford Law School graduate and a former criminal prosecutor and attorney...and the legal issues raised -- alleging violation of 1st Amendment and statutory rights regarding social network pages operated by a government official -- could apply in contexts beyond animal shelter issues.
Contact us: mail@LBReport.com |
Hardwood Floor Specialists Call (562) 422-2800 or (714) 836-7050 |