Publisher's Perspective

Competitor Declines's Offer To Co-Host State Senate Candidate Debate is reader and advertiser supported. Support independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.
(April. 18, 2019, 4:37 p.m.) -- This afternoon (April 18), a competitor,, declined's offer made over a week earlier to co-host/webcast a candidate forum between the two state Senate runoff candidates that would include candidate interactions. Its response came after reported today (April 18) that the Wrigley Association had managed to arrange a candidate forum between the two runoff candidates for May 6 using the group's traditional election candidate format (which doesn't include what we call candidate "verbal intercourse.")

As we have at previous Wrigley Association candidate fora, plans to provide extended video/audio coverage of the Wrigley event (in what we call "C-SPAN-style" without comments.)

On April 10, offered the opportunity "to jointly conduct a forum that uses the generally accepted 'press conference' style of debates (routinely used in presidential debates) in which the candidates respond to reporters' questions. We favor allowing the candidates flexibility to interact with each other without artificial time constraints." We noted that "[s]ome meaningful exchanges in presidential debates have occurred during the latter." Our offer continued:

We believe the event should be divided into two parts: each candidate's respective votes while in office (an incumbent's record is always relevant in seeking higher office) and pending Sacramento legislation/statewide issues on which they may cast votes. We know the event can be interactive for online views; we believe viewers' questions can be fairly bundled as long as they're plainly asked.

[Scroll down for further.] made our offer although mindful that had an in-person opportunity to ask candidate Gonzalez a number of questions it didn't ask during the initial March 26 election cycle that we considered basic, timely and newsworthy. We asked the short questions via a written card submitted at an independently conducted Feb. 27 candidate forum, but Gonzalez wasn't present. We learned later she was part of a city-delegation in Vancouver, B.C. promoting business ties with Canada.

The next day we then offered candidate Gonzalez and her campaign the opportunity to answer the questions in writing but we didn't receive a response.

We then sought to attend two "Meet Lena" campaign events in March but the event-location hosts both informed us at the door that the events were "closed to press." (After one of the events at a Lakewood business, candidate Gonzalez ducked out the back door to an alley while we waited at the front door.)

We added in our April 10 offer to "We believe it's understandable but unhealthy to let campaigns hand reporters crafted candidate messages while limiting press access to the candidates themselves."

On April 18,'s publisher David Sommers emailed us: "Thank you for the email and the offer to partner on a debate for the state Senate runoff. At the time of your request, our own debate planning, invitations to and communications with both campaigns was [sic] already well underway, so the Post will proceed as-is and independently on our planning efforts."

For the record: shortly after dawn on the morning after the March 26 runoff election outcome, emailed candidates Gonzalez and Guerrero and offered to host and provide webcast access to a debate between them on terms to be mutually agreed. Candidate Guerrero accepted; candidate Gonzalez's campaign didn't respond; our offer remains open., now in our 19th year of providing independent news in Long Beach, has no ownership or operational ties to any development or special interests, or stands to benefit from City development decisions or holds an appointed position on any City Hall chosen body or has made any campaign contribution(s) to any candidate on whom we report.

6:15 p.m. Date of February candidate forum corrected to Feb. 27 (not 26.)






Support really independent news in Long Beach. No one in's ownership, reporting or editorial decision-making has ties to development interests, advocacy groups or other special interests; or is seeking or receiving benefits of City development-related decisions; or holds a City Hall appointive position; or has contributed sums to political campaigns for Long Beach incumbents or challengers. isn't part of an out of town corporate cluster and no one its ownership, editorial or publishing decisionmaking has been part of the governing board of any City government body or other entity on whose policies we report. is reader and advertiser supported. You can help keep really independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Recommend to your Facebook friends:

Follow with:




Return To Front Page

Contact us:

Adoptable pet of the week:

Carter Wood Floors
Hardwood Floor Specialists
Call (562) 422-2800 or (714) 836-7050

Copyright © 2019, LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use/Legal policy, click here. Privacy Policy, click here