-->
LBReport.com

News

City Hall Mum (Again) As Sac'to Bill To Require Increased Single Family Neighborhood Density Faces Hearing Today



If LBREPORT.com didn't tell you,
who would?
No one in LBREPORT.com's ownership, reporting or editorial decision-making has ties to development interests, advocacy groups or other special interests; or is seeking or receiving benefits of City development-related decisions; or holds a City Hall appointive position; or has contributed sums to political campaigns for Long Beach incumbents or challengers. LBREPORT.com isn't part of an out of town corporate cluster and no one its ownership, editorial or publishing decisionmaking has been part of the governing board of any City government body or other entity on whose policies we report.

LBREPORT.com is reader and advertiser supported. Support independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.
UPDATE: At 11:40 a.m., the state Senate Housing Committee -- with state Senator Umberg (SE LB-west OC) voting yes -- advanced SB 9 to the state Senate Governance Committee. SB 9 is co-authored by state Senator Lena Gonzalez (D, LB-SE LA County.). SB9 author Senate President Pro Tem Toni Atkins (D, San Diego) acknowledges SB 9 allows up to four units on single family home lot. Livable California says it allows up to four to six units and invites "McMansions" on single family home lots. Details to follow.
(April 15, 2021) -- Long Beach City Hall is mum (again) as SB 9 -- which would increase single family home neighborhood density -- co-authored by state Senator Lena Gonzalez (D, Long Beach-SE LA County) -- comes to a hearing in the state Senate Housing Committee which includes state Senator Tom Umberg (D, SE LB-west OC).

Nearly identifical to last year's SB 1120 (which would have allowed four-plexes and arguably up to sixplexes) but now amended, SB 9 requires ministerial (City Clerk check list type) approval of a housing development of no more than two units in a single-family zone (duplex), the subdivision of a parcel zoned for residential use into two parcels (lot split), or both.

Livable California and United Neighbors in opposition say despite amendments it's not a duplex bill and would allow up to six plexes on single family home lots..

A Senate Housing Committee legislative analysis states that SB 9:

a) Clarifies that no more than two units are authorized when providing for ministerial approval of a duplex on a single-family parcel.
c) Adds a new provision specifying that this bill shall not be construed to supersede the California Coastal Act of 1976, except that local governments shall not be required to hold public hearings for coastal development permit applications for a housing development pursuant to this bill.
d) Precludes locals from requiring either unit in a duplex or unis on a lot split from being at least 800 square feet.
e) Authorize the lot splits to be up to 40/60 split, instead of two parcels of equal size.
f) Allows a local government to impose owner occupancy requirements on a lot split if it meets either of the following requirements: (i) the applicant intends to live in the unit for a minimum of one year from the date of the approval of the lot split, or (ii) the applicant is a “qualified non-profit”. No additional owner occupancy standards may be imposed, and this requirement expires after five years.
Long Beach City Hall's Government Affairs Manager, Dr. Tyler Curlet, says the City hasn't taken a position on SB 9 "at this time [since] it's still early in the legislative session [and] we continue to monitor these bills as they’re amended through the committee process."

The City of LB remained neutral throughout the legislative process as last year's 1120 advanced to near passage. SB 1120 was strongly opposed by Corliss Lee's grassroos The Eastside Voice..

Below are the cities opposing the bill. .




e


Cities of Arcata, Azusa, Bellflower, Beverly Hills, Brentwood, Burbank, Camarillo, Carpinteria, Carson, Cerritos, Chino, Chino Hills, Clayton, Clearlake, Clovis, Cupertino, Cypress, Diamond Bar, Dorris, Downey, Dublin, Eastvale, El Segundo, Escalon, Fortuna, Fountain Valley, Garden Grove, Glendora, Grand Terrace, Half Moon Bay, Hesperia, Hidden Hills, Irvine, Irwindale, Kerman, King, La Palma, La Verne, Lafayette, Laguna Beach, Laguna Niguel, Lakeport, Lakewood, Lancaster, Lomita, Los Alamitos, Los Altos, Martinez, Maywood, Menifee, Merced, Mission Viejo, Monterey, Moorpark, Murrieta, Newman, Newport Beach, Norwalk, Novato, Oakdale, Ontario, Orinda, Palo Alto, Palos Verdes Estates, Paramount, Pismo Beach, Placentia, Pleasanton, Poway, Rancho Cucamonga, Rancho Palos Verdes, Rancho Santa Margarita, Redding, Redondo Beach, Rohnert Park, Rolling Hills, Rolling Hills Estates, San Gabriel, San Jacinto, San Marcos, San Marino, Santa Clara, Santa Clarita, Santa Monica, Saratoga, Signal Hill, South Pasadena, Stanton, Sunnyvale, Temecula, Thousand Oaks, Torrance, Tracy, Vacaville, Ventura, Vista, Westlake Village, Whittier, and Yorba Lind
Sponsor

Sponsor

Below are groups on record opposed:

Adams Hill Neighborhood Association Aids Healthcare Foundation Alameda Citizens Task Force Albany Neighbors United Berkeley Associated Neighbors Against Non-affordable Housing Burton Valley Neighborhoods Group California Alliance of Local Electeds California Cities for Local Control California Contract Cities Association Catalysts Citizens Preserving Venice Coalition for San Francisco Neighborhoods Coalition to Save Ocean Beach College Street Neighborhood Group College Terrace Residents Association Committee to Save the Hollywoodland Specific Plan Community Associations Institute - California Legislative Action Committee Comstock Hills Homeowners Association D4ward Durand Ridge United Encinitas Neighbors Coalition Friends of Sutro Park Hidden Hill Community Association Hills 2000 Friends of The Hills Hollywood Knolls Community Club Hollywoodland Homeowners Association Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association LA Brea Hancock Homeowners Association Lafayette Homeowners Council Lakewood Village Neighborhood Association Las Virgenes-Malibu Council of Governments Latino Alliance for Community Engagement League of California Cities League of California Cities Central Valley Division Linda Vista-Annandale Association Livable California Livable Pasadena Los Altos Residents Los Angeles County Division, League of California Cities Los Feliz Improvement Association Marin County Council of Mayors and Councilmembers Miracle Mile Residential Association Miraloma Park Improvement Club Mission Street Neighbors Montecito Association Neighborhood Council Sustainability Alliance Trees Committee North of Montana Association Northeast Neighbors of Santa Monica Pacific Palisades Community Council Planning Association for The Richmond Riviera Homeowners Association San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments Save Lafayette SB 9 (Atkins) Page 14 of 14 Seaside Neighborhood Association Shadow Hills Property Owners Association Sherman Oaks Homeowners Association South Shores Community Association Southwood Homeowners Association Sunnyvale United Neighbors Sunset-Parkside Education and Action Committee Sustainable Tamalmonte Temecula Valley Neighborhood Coalition Towns of Apple Valley, Colma, Fairfax, Mammoth Lakes, and Ross Ventura Council of Governments Verdugo Woodlands West Homeowners Association West Pasadena Residents' Association West Torrance Homeowners Association West Wood Highlands Neighborhood Association Westside Regional Alliance of Councils Westwood Homeowners Association Wilshire Montana Neighborhood Coalition Windsor Square Association 235 Individuals

Sponsor

Sponsor

Below are groups in favor of SB 9:

Council Member Jon Wizard, City of Seaside Council Member Zach Hilton, City of Gilroy AARP Abundant Housing LA ADU Task Force East Bay All Home American Planning Association, California Chapter Bay Area Council Bridge Housing Corporation Cal Chamber CalChamber California Apartment Association California YIMBY Casita Coalition California Building Industry Association Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Circulate San Diego City of Oakland City of San Diego East Bay for Everyone Facebook Fieldstead and Company Generation Housing Greenbelt Alliance Habitat for Humanity California Hello Housing Housing Action Coalition Local Government Commission Los Angeles Business Council Midpen Housing Modular Building Institute Mountain View YIMBY National Association of Hispanic Real Estate Professionals Non-profit Housing Association of Northern California North Bay Leadership Council Northern Neighbors Peninsula for Everyone People for Housing - Orange County San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce San Francisco Bay Area Planning and Research Association (SPUR) San Francisco YIMBY Sand Hill Property Company Share Sonoma County Silicon Valley Leadership Group South Bay Cities Council of Governments South Bay YIMBY South Pasadena Residents for Responsible Growth Streets for People Bay Area Silicon Valley @ Home TechEquity Collaborative Tent Makers Terner Center for Housing Innovation At the University of California, Berkeley The Two Hundred TMG Partners United Way of Greater Los Angeles Urban Environmentalists YIMBY Action 92 Individuals

Sponsor

Sponsor

LB city management hasn't taken a position o SB 9 (despite verbiage in the City Councl approved "state legislative agenda" reciting opposition to bills harming local control.)

City Hall's Government Affairs Manager is Dr. Tyler Curly, formerly Mayor Robert Garcia's Legislative Deputy, later Chief of Staff for former 1st District Councilwoman (now state Senator), Lena Gonzalez, a co-author of SB 9, and most recently served in Senator Gonzalez's office as her Legislative Director/Policy Liaison.

Sponsor


Dr. Curly and city management don't set city policy. A majority of the City Council does. The Council's "State Legislation Committee" (which can offer recommendations to the Council) is chaired by Vice Mayor Rex Richardson and includes vice chair Councilman Roberto Uranga and member Councilman Al Austin) has met once in 2021 to recommend approval of the City's "State Legislative Agenda" which includes verbiage stating; ."Oppose legislation that would reduce the City’s local land use authority" and that "would reduce the City’s local land use authority and support implementation of the City Council adopted planning documents."

Details include:

a) Support policies and legislation that protect and/or expands the City’s authority and rights over its affairs.
b) Oppose policies and legislation that preempt the current authority possessed by the City and delegates that authority to the State or other governmental jurisdiction...
f) Oppose policies and legislation that diminish the City’s local control over land use, planning, zoning and development decisions, and oppose legislation in conflict with the City’s adopted General Plan or other Council adopted land use policies...

Regardless of the Council's State Legislation Committee, any Councilmember(s) could agendize SB 9 for City Council action.


Support really independent news in Long Beach. No one in LBREPORT.com's ownership, reporting or editorial decision-making has ties to development interests, advocacy groups or other special interests; or is seeking or receiving benefits of City development-related decisions; or holds a City Hall appointive position; or has contributed sums to political campaigns for Long Beach incumbents or challengers. LBREPORT.com isn't part of an out of town corporate cluster and no one its ownership, editorial or publishing decisionmaking has been part of the governing board of any City government body or other entity on whose policies we report. LBREPORT.com is reader and advertiser supported. You can help keep really independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.


blog comments powered by Disqus

Recommend LBREPORT.com to your Facebook friends:


Follow LBReport.com with:

Twitter

Facebook

RSS

Return To Front Page

Contact us: mail@LBReport.com



Adoptable pet of the week:




Copyright © 2021 LBReport.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use/Legal policy, click here. Privacy Policy, click here