Another Shooting in Supernaw's CD 4 (b/w Traffic Circle & Redondo, South of PCH)
Amnesia File: Less than two years ago, Supernaw argued against restoring LBPD's field anti-gang unit, boasted CD4 had no homicides for past two years. Now it has LB's 5th hghest shooting total with 3 homicides since Dec. 2020.
If LBREPORT.com didn't tell you, who would?
No one in LBREPORT.com's ownership, reporting or editorial decision-making has ties to development interests, advocacy groups or other special interests; or is seeking or receiving benefits of City development-related decisions; or holds a City Hall appointive position; or has contributed sums to political campaigns for Long Beach incumbents or challengers. LBREPORT.com isn't part of an out of town corporate cluster and no one its ownership, editorial or publishing decisionmaking has been part of the governing board of any City government body or other entity on whose policies we report.
LBREPORT.com is reader and advertiser supported. Support independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.
LBREPORT.com weclomes linking to this article on CD 4 NextDoor pages.
(April 10, 2021) -- Residents in Councilman Daryl Supernaw's 4th Council district neighborhood between the Traffic Circle and Redondo Ave. south of PCH had another shooting overnight April 9.
LBPD Public Information Officer Allison Gallagher says that at roughly 2:30 a.m., officers responded to a shots call in the 1700 block of Loma Ave. They found evidence of a shooting including casings but were unable to locate a suspect or victim.
PIO Gallagher says the motive for the shooting is unknown and LBPD's investigation is continuing.
The latest shootihgs follows a March 27 double-homicide in basically the same neighborhood, followed by two shootings a bit west of redondo (2500 block of Spaulding St. and 2100 block of E. 15th St.) in which police found evidence of gunfire but no persons hit.
Supernaw's CD 4 now has the fifth highest number of shootings (person hit + casings/vehicles or buildings hit, + homicides).among LB's nine Council districts.
In 2019. as a member of the Council's "Public Safety Committee," Supernaw said he didn't want to hear further public calls to restore LBPD's (now former) field anti-gang unit and boasted that his CD 4 district hadn;had any homicides for the previous two years. Today, CD 4 has had three homicides since Dec. 2020, including a 14 year Camodian-American boy found dead on the street in the area of St, Louis Ave. .In early 2021, Mayor Garcia with Council approval reconfigured Council committees. Supernaw and former chair Suzie Price are no longer members of the Council's Public Safety Committee. Garcia chose CD 6 Councilwoman Suely Saro, an opponent of restoring the field anti-gang unit, to chair the Committee (and thus choose its agenda items.)
Shooting Crime Scenes Jan 1, 2021 to the present Red = Homicides. Blue = Persons hit. Yellow = Casings found or vehicle or bldg hit
[Scroll down for further.]
.
e
Amnesia File
On April 30, 2019, the City Council's Public Safety Committee (then chair: Suzie Price; vice chair: Daryl Supernaw; member: Al Austin) met to hear items that included an LBPD presentation on "current gang intervention strategies."
The item occurred in the context of the City Council's approval of Mayor/management recommended budgets that haven't restored funding for LBPD's former 22-member field anti-gang unit. Until FY13, LB taxpayers had an LBPD field anti-gang unit consisting of 20 budgeted officers + 2 sergeants allocated specifically to gang-plagued neighborhoods where they could consistently communicate, interact and develop relationships with residents and businesses, observe conditions and collect intelligence. For a detailed chronology of how LB taxpayers lost their field anti-gang unit under Mayors Foster and Garcia and their respective Councils, click here.
(Failing to restore funding for the field anti-gang unit takes place in the context of the Mayor/Council's failure to restore 186 citywide deployable police officers that LB taxpayers previously had, leaving LB with the thin per capita police level detailed here.)
Sponsor
Sponsor
LBPD does have an anti-gang unit. It actively investigates shootings, identifies and locates suspects, makes arrests, testifies in court and handles related matters. In addition, each LBPD Division (North, South, East and West) has a Directed Enforcement Team to handle specific assignments as directed by each Division's Commander. Those specific assignments can include gang issues as well as multiple other policing needs including quality of life and various neighborhood impacting crimes.
But without LBPD's field anti-gang unit, each of the four Directed Enforcement Teams now try to perform functions similar to what the field anti-gang unit performed. The net result is less than what LB taxpayers previously received. LB taxpayers previously had a field anti-gang unit plus four flexibly deployed "Directed Enforcement Teams" available to handle multiple issues. Now LB taxpayers have no field anti-gang unit and the Division's Directed Enforcement Teams now have to deal with escalating gang issues during which time they can't devote attention to other community policing needs.
Sponsor
Sponsor
At the April 30, 2019 Public Safety Committee meeting, Councilman Supernaw (then-facing re-election in March 2020) sought to portray the status quo as basically providing the same anti-gang functions as previously...and in effect discouraged members of the community from bringing up the subject again.
Below is a transcript of a salient portion of that April 30, 2019 agenda item. .
Councilman Supernaw: I'm going to bring up a topic that has appeared before and that is field gang units, and to our esteemed chair here she's probably say "asked and answered" in her parlance but I think it bears repeating just so members of the community don't bring this up again.
My understanding is that the function of the field gang unit still exists but we don't specifically have a field gang unit. I guess I would say back when we did, that field gang unit could take on other responsibilities at any given time if there were burglaries, they could be assigned to that for a day, and I don't want to divulge how any systems work, but from what I understood you to say in terms of intervention strategies, that there are gang officers and the Direct Enforcement Officers within in a patrol division can function at any given time as a field gang unit. Would that be accurate?
Commander Robert Smith: Councilman, I would say that the Directed Enforcement Teams, they have many functions but one of their emphasis is certainly on gang crimes.
Councilman Supernaw: OK, thank you. And in terms of the crimes being committed, I'll just speak for the 4th Council district, we need to put things in perspective. In 2013, the 4th district specifically Beat 11, led the city in homicides with 8. Knock on wood, we haven't had a homicide in the 4th district for over two years, so thank you for the great work.
(Audio of the full agenda item (LBPD testimony plus Councilmembers' responses) runs about 22 minutes. LBREPORT.com has made it easily accessible on-demand at this link.)
Sponsor
A little over two years earlier on Dec. 6, 2016 (about six months after LB voters approved the Measure A "blank check" sales tax increase), LBPD Deputy Chief Richard Conant told the Public Safety Committee (responding to a question by Supernaw) that as a result of the Mayor/Council's decision to end funding for the field anti-gang unit, LBPD uses its gang intel team plus Directed Enforcement Team plus a crime analyst to try to replicate what the field anti-gang unit previously did. He said it's "similar," not the same...and a close reading shows it's clearly less than what LB taxpayers previously received.
Deputy Chief Conant "...Our gang field team was a in-the-field rollin' around responsive team to calls. In place of that, since fiscal cuts, we are utilizing our Direct Enforcement Team in a similar fashion. As you know, our Direct Enforcement Team is a proactive team that handles our quality of life related issues and/or acts as an immediate response team for Divisional Commanders for gang crimes, and any criminal trend or crime trend that may be occurring in a respective Division. Our Direct Enforcement Teams work in conjunction with out gang intel team, effectively working as an extension of the gang enforcement unit...
On April 30, 2019, LBPD Commander Smith told the Council's Public Safety Committee that Long Beach "is home to nearly two dozen documented local street gangs and several other regional gangs that frequent our city for a variety of reasons." In the roughly six weeks since he spoke, LB has had 21 shooting crime scenes, most of which disproportionately impacted historically disadvantaged families and businesses in working class neighborhoods.
In 2018, LB Financial Management Department told LBREPORT.com that restoring 10 citywide deployable officers (fully turned-out/equipped) would cost (figure for rough budget estimate purposes) about $2 million. That would put the budgeted cost of restoring LBPD's field anti-gang unit (20 officers + 2 sergeants) at a little over $4 million.
In June 2016, LB voters approved the Mayor-sought/Council enabled Measure A General Fund ("blank check") sales tax increase giving LB City Hall over $50 million more each year. At the same time, LB's Mayor hasn't recommended, and LB's Council hasn't restored, LBPD's field anti-gang unit and 186 citywide deployable police officers that LB taxpayers had and no longer have. .
The City of Long Beach currently provides LB taxpayers with a budgeted sworn police level for routine citywide deployment of roughly 1.5 officers per thousand residents.) By comparison, L.A and Santa Monica budget roughly 2.43 and 2.49 officers per thousand residents respectively (not including LA Airport/Port police.) Signal Hill, surrounded by Long Beach, budgets roughly 3.15 sworn officers per thousand residents for its taxpayers.
Support really independent news in Long Beach. No one in LBREPORT.com's ownership, reporting or editorial decision-making has ties to development interests, advocacy groups or other special interests; or is seeking or receiving benefits of City development-related decisions; or holds a City Hall appointive position; or has contributed sums to political campaigns for Long Beach incumbents or challengers. LBREPORT.com isn't part of an out of town corporate cluster and no one its ownership, editorial or publishing decisionmaking has been part of the governing board of any City government body or other entity on whose policies we report. LBREPORT.com is reader and advertiser supported. You can help keep really independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.
