Support the LB businesses you see here:

Carter Wood Floor pic
Carter Wood Floors, a LB company, will restore your wood floor or install a new one. Special offer for readers, click photo.

Lovelace pic
Who is this guy, Bill Lovelace? Click on picture to find out.

NetKontent Digital Video Cutting Edge Services For The Internet, Broadcast and Multimedia. Click For Info

Tank pic
This vehicle in Iraq (courtesy USMC) is well insured. Are you? For auto, home, business, health, boat, motorcycle coverage, call Pollman's Insurance: 23 yrs. in business, 4th generation LB family. Info, click photo

Nino's Ristorante: A delicious treasure in Bixby Knolls. Click here if you're hungry or for catering!
3853 Atlantic Ave.

The Enterlines
Bill & Karen Enterline are ELB realty experts. Click here for info on area property values.

Your E-Mail
Click here

  • Neighborhood Groups/Meetings
  • How To Recall a LB Elected Official
  • Crime Data
  • City Council Agendas
  • Port of LB Agendas
  • E-Mail Your Councilmember
  • Council District Map
  • LB Parks, Rec & Marine
  • LB Schools
  • LB Airport
  • Sacramento
  • Washington
  • References & Archives
  • Lost, Found & Adoptable Pets


    City Att'y Wins Big Reversal In Court of Appeal: Justices Say LB Campaign Reform Act Isn't Subject To Anti-SLAPP Suit Defense, Reinstate Prop M Enforcement Action Against CCNE (stemming from April 2002 election)

    (August 14, 2003, updated with reaction) -- The LB City Attorney's office has won big in a big it said could determine the future of LB's Campaign Reform Act concerning activities by independent committees (not controlled by a candidate).

    The 2d district CA Court of Appeal has reversed a lower court and reinstated a civil suit -- an enforcement action brought by LB City Hall under Prop M, LB's Campaign Reform Act -- against CA Citizens for Neighborhood Empowerment (CCNE) stemming from the April 2002 race for LB Mayor.

    The Court of Appeal ruled the enforcement action brought by the City Attorney under Prop M was not subject to dismissal under the state's anti-SLAPP suit law. We post the Court of Appeal's opinion below...which the Court ordered certified for publication so it can be cited as precedent in subsequent cases.

    City Attorney Robert Shannon argued the case personally before the three judge appellate panel in July.

    The Court of Appeal ruling effectively reinstates a civil action filed in April 2002 by the City of LB against CCNE, which alleged the group (registered as an independent political committee) violated LB Campaign Reform Act by accepting contributions in excess of LB's Prop M contribution limits in support of a Mayoral candidate (not alleged with wrongdoing) in the April 9, 2002 election.

    Commenting on the Court of Appeal's ruling, City Attorney Shannon told

    "Obviously, this is a very positive result from our perspective. Generally, it validates our ability to enforce the city's campaign contribution limits -- which were enacted by an overwhelming vote of the people of the Long Beach, so this is is enforcing the will of the people of Long Beach.

    It also sends the message that we are prepared to pursue enforcement remedies against any individual or entity who violates our Campaign Reform Law. That should be kept in mind by all those who may be involved in elections in the City of Long Beach.

    And in this case, it will allow us to conduct discovery, including depositions...and at the end of the day, we will bring this organization [CCNE] out of the shadows."

    CCNE attorney Bradley Hertz (with the L.A. firm of Reed & Davidson) was unavailable to for comment.

    In September, 2002, a Superior Court tossed out the city's suit by granting a motion by CCNE under CA's "anti-SLAPP" suit law which lets a court toss out a civil lawsuit claim "arising from any act [of a person] in furtherance of that person's right of petition of free speech" under the U.S. or state Constitutions unless the plaintiff establishes a probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim.

    The Court of Appeal agreed with the City of LB's legal position that the "anti-SLAPP" law did not apply in the City of LB's Prop M enforcement action.

    The Court of Appeal remanded the case (sent it back) to the trial court with instructions to reinstate it. The Court also granted the City of LB its costs on appeal.

    We post the Court of Appeal's opinion in pdf form on the following link: Court of Appeal opinion in City of LB v. CCNE et al. [9 pages]

    Related coverage

  • Read Briefs By Both Sides In City of LB Appeal Of Lower Court Dismissal Of City's Prop M (LB Campaign Reform Act) Civil Enforcement Action Against CCNE
  • Court of Appeal Hears Oral Argument In CCNE / LB Campaign Reform Act Case

  • Return To Front Page

    Contact us:


    Copyright © 2003, LLC. All rights reserved. Third parties may cite portions as fair use if attributed to "" (print media) or "Long Beach Report dot com" (electronic media). Terms of Use/Legal policy, click here. Privacy Policy, click here