Support the LB businesses you see here:

Maru King
New: ELB Japanese Food Maru King: Fresh, Fast, Healthy Money Saving Coupon, Click Here

Joe Sopo
Joe Sopo, Realtor has his pulse On LB real estate. Click for info
Lovelace pic

LB DJ Bill "Santa" Lovelace Offers $100 Holiday Discount For Readers. Plan Your Xmas Party Now! Click Here

Pollman's Insurance, Full Service, Homegrown Firm Helping LB Area Homeowners & Drivers Save In 2005! Click for info.

Carter Wood Floor pic
Carter Wood Floors, a LB company, will restore your wood floor or install a new one. Enhance your home. Click pic.

Mike & Kathi Kowal
Mike & Kathi Kowal know Los Cerritos, Bixby Knolls, Cal Hts. and beyond. Click to learn more

NetKontent Digital Video Cutting Edge Services For The Internet, Broadcast and Multimedia. Click For Info

Ninos Ristorante: A delicious treasure in Bixby Knolls. Click here if you're hungry or for catering!
3853 Atlantic Ave.

Your E-Mail
Click here

  • Neighborhood Groups/Meetings
  • How To Recall a LB Elected Official
  • Crime Data
  • City Council Agendas
  • Port of LB Agendas
  • Planning Comm'n Agendas
  • E-Mail Your Council member
  • Council District Map
  • LB Parks, Rec & Marine
  • LB Schools
  • LB Airport Watchdog
  • Sacramento
  • Washington
  • References & Archives
  • Lost, Found & Adoptable Pets


    OC Supervisor & Statewide Redevelopment Critic Chris Norby: Redevelopment Itself Is The Problem, Not Just Who Runs It

    (December 21, 2004) -- Orange County Supervisor Chris Norby -- a former Fullerton Mayor/Councilman who authored a widely read book critical of Redevelopment in CA -- has told that LB's current hot button debate over a possible City Council-run Redevelopment Agency is fine -- "overall it's good for a City Council to maintain tight control over Redevelopment" -- but stressed that this doesn't address the major problem he sees with Redevelopment: the process itself.

    In a brief telephone conversation this afternoon (Dec. 21), Supervisor Norby told that he believes the public (in general) has valid reasons to be concerned that a Council-led RDA might expand Redevelopment to increase its access to property tax money by declaring more parts of the city "blighted"...a problem he said is invited by the Redevelopment process itself regardless of who runs it.

    "Redevelopment agencies try to make up for mistakes of the past by expanding and creating more Redevelopment," said Supervisor Norby, author of the 1990s book Redevelopment: The Unknown Government. A Report to the People of California, which was highly critical of the Redevelopment process.

    Supervisor Norby declined to back either side in LB's debate over whether LB's elected City Council should run LB's Redevelopment Agency, currently run by a non-elected board.

    He indicated some surprise when told by that LB City Hall had assigned to the Redevelopment Agency some government grants obtained by the city...and expects the RDA to "repay" City Hall for the value of the grants (using property tax increment money).

    Supervisor Norby called this an "interesting way of shifting money around," adding that he didn't know offhand if it was legal. "I'd have to know more about it," Supervisor Norby said, declining comment on the issue without knowing details.

    However, Supervisor Norby did say that he favors getting Redevelopment money into General Funds...and supports changing state law to remove the distinctions between "Redevelopment" and General Fund monies.

    And he remains an outspoken critic of the Redevelopment process generally, telling

    The big problem with Redevelopment is its use to subsidize retail...Consideration of a Council-run Redevelopment Agency is fine, but doesn't answer the real question of the overall purpose of Redevelopment: how it's being used to subsidize retail and big developers...

    Redevelopment typically tries to make up for making things worse and worse by trying to expand, worsening its past failures by creating new ones. It's basically a scam.

    It's built on faulty premises of centralized economic planning and robbing money from other levels of government...

    ...Asking who ought to run Redevelopment [the City Council or an independent board] is fine [a worthy discussion] but doesn't answer the question of how Redevelopment is being used to chase retail. It's a statewide problem...

    Redevelopment shows an extreme bias toward large developers at the expense of smaller busineses...Using eminent domain and an army of consultants, Redevelopment makes cities increasingly less interesting by homogenizing them. It's actually created a type of "Redevelopment architecture," I think it's phony and cheap looking, designed to make a quick impact, favoring big chains while Mon and Pop stores are squeezed out.

    Return To Front Page

    Contact us:


    Copyright © 2004, LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use/Legal policy, click here. Privacy Policy, click here