LBReport.com

News / Perspective

City Hall-Hired Attorney Says LBPD Use Of Self-Destructing Text Message App Didn't/Doesn't Break Laws Or Jeopardize Criminal Cases Or Violate Public Records Act Or Violate City Hall-Written Policies

Responses expected from ACLU So Cal. and Beachcomber writer Downing. Opinion from LBREPORT.com publisher Pearl: "In our opinion, the document's defensive contentions invite abuses of the CA Public Records Act that the City Council can and should act to prevent."


LBREPORT.com is reader and advertiser supported. Support independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.
(Dec. 8, 2018, 2:10 p.m.) -- On Friday Dec. 7, the City of Long Beach released a report that Long Beach officials label an "independent review," prepared by an attorney retained by the City of Long Beach, after news stories in the Beachcomber (bylined to Stephen Downing) and Al Jazeera (which worked with the ACLU of So. Cal in concert with Mr. Downing) disclosed LBPD's use of a digital application that automatically deletes text message communications after a specified period of time. Both outlets cited unnamed LBPD sources who indicated the app was used in circumstances that could or did conceal embarrassing or problematic conduct. The City-retained attorney's report concluded in pertinent part that:

  • There is no evidence to support claims of illegal use or misuse of the TigerConnect app by the PD, and no complaints or reports of adverse effects in criminal or civil cases

  • No individual has come forward to make or substantiate any of the claims of misuse of [sic] illegal use of the TigerConnect app by the PD as reported in the media articles which prompted this review

  • It appears that the use of the TigerConnect app by the PD is in compliance with existing and emerging policies of the City regarding records retention, as well as state law on the subject

  • The self-destruction of messages on the TigerConnect app, and the policies of the City permitting that function, do not violate or prevent compliance with the Public Records Act

  • The use of the TigerConnect app by the PD does not violate constitutional or statutory requirements for retention and disclosure of evidence in criminal cases and there are no reports of constitutional or discovery issues in cases prosecuted in which the PD was an investigating agency

  • The operation of the TiggerConnect messaging app would not, outside of the context of active litigation, be considered "spoliation," subject to any type of discovery sanction by the courts, resulting in prejudice to the City in its civil litigation.

  • The City could now undertake applicable policy review to ensure those measures comprehend this technology, address its uses and are consistent with overall communications policies

    [Source: "Report to the City of Long Beach -- Long Beach Police Department Acquisition and Use of the TigerConnect Instant Messaging App Legal and Policies Issues." Dec. 2018, pp. 6-7] prepared by Gary W. Schons, of counsel to Best Best & Krieger, LLP, City hired attorney (Best, Best & Krieger firm)

  • The report adds: "The standard for thorough and complete legal research, judgment and advice expected of legal counsel were applied to [the report's] determinations and those were reviewed by a number of this firm's counsel internally." [Report p. 4]

    [Scroll down for further.]






    LBREPORT.com has invited responses from the ACLU of Southern California and from Mr. Downing. We'll report them as received.

    Following an initial review of the document, LBREPORT.com publisher Bill Pearl stated: "In our opinion, the document's defensive contentions invite abuses of the CA Public Records Act that the City Council can and should act to prevent." He added: "Long Beach residents shouldn't let their City operate on a legalistic playbook enabling concealment. The City Council sets policies. A Council majority can and should vote to enact policies that unambiguously ensure real transparency, prevent pretextual concealments and protect the public's right to know."

    Further to follow on LBREPORT.com

    Sponsor

    Sponsor

    Sponsor


    Sponsor

    Sponsor



    Support really independent news in Long Beach. No one in LBREPORT.com's ownership, reporting or editorial decision-making has ties to incumbent Long Beach officials, development interests, advocacy groups or other special interests; or is seeking or receiving benefits of City development-related decisions; or holds a City Hall appointive position; or has contributed sums to political campaigns for Long Beach incumbents or challengers. LBREPORT.com isn't part of an out of town corporate cluster and no one its ownership, editorial or publishing decisionmaking has been part of the governing board of any City government body or other entity on whose policies we report. LBREPORT.com is reader and advertiser supported. You can help keep really independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.


    blog comments powered by Disqus

    Recommend LBREPORT.com to your Facebook friends:


    Follow LBReport.com with:

    Twitter

    Facebook

    RSS

    Return To Front Page

    Contact us: mail@LBReport.com



    Adoptable pet of the week:





    Carter Wood Floors
    Hardwood Floor Specialists
    Call (562) 422-2800 or (714) 836-7050


    Copyright © 2018 LBReport.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use/Legal policy, click here. Privacy Policy, click here