LBReport.com

News

Should Council Allow "Micro-Housing-Units" (Possibly 300-350 Sq. Ft) In These LB Areas? City Staff Will Bring Pilot Plan To Council (Part Of Affordable Housing Options Council Requested In 2017)


If LBREPORT.com didn't tell you,
who would?
No one in LBREPORT.com's ownership, reporting or editorial decision-making has ties to development interests, advocacy groups or other special interests; or is seeking or receiving benefits of City development-related decisions; or holds a City Hall appointive position; or has contributed sums to political campaigns for Long Beach incumbents or challengers. LBREPORT.com isn't part of an out of town corporate cluster and no one its ownership, editorial or publishing decisionmaking has been part of the governing board of any City government body or other entity on whose policies we report.

LBREPORT.com is reader and advertiser supported. Support independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.
(Feb. 6, 2020, 2:30 p.m.) -- Should the City of LB allow "micro housing units" -- multi-unit buildings offering rent-paying tenants living spaces of perhaps 300-350 sq. ft.? That;s the size of about six or seven combined jail cells...but for some, it may be convenient and affordable, located along transit lines and affordable without taxpayer or cross-tenant subsidies.

Tenants now rent similarly sized "micro" housing units in parts of New York City and San Francisco. So...should the City of LB -- where previous Councils enabled "crackerbox" apartment density -- address calls for more affordable housing by enabling "micro housing units," initially as a pilot (test) project and if so in what part(s) of LB?

In a February 3, 2020 memo to the Mayor and City Council, city management offers Councilmembers options for enabling up to 500 such "micro units" across four areas: PD-30 ("Downtown Plan" density/high rise area) PD-6 (Downtown Shoreline area), Midtown area (along the LB Blvd. corridor from 14th St. Park to the 405 freeway) and SEASP portion of SE LB.

[Scroll down for further.]




The origin for this was a May 2, 2017 City Ccouncil voted action (8-0, Mungo absent) that approve (with one tweak) 29 policy recommendations on "Revenue Tools and Incentives for the Production of Affordable and Workforce Housing." City staff brought the recommendations forward after study sessions by a task force chosen by Mayor Garcia that included community input. Recommendation 3.11 directed city staff to "develop a plan to include micro-units as a method for encouraging housing production."

To implement the Council's voted recommendation on micro-units, city staff's Feb,. 3, 2020 memo says it's "working on an ordinance that would establish a 500-unit (5 to 10 projects) pilot program with a focus on geographic areas that, based on existing development standards, can better facilitate micro-unit projects and enable the City to test potential regulations. If the pilot is successful, adjustments will be made to the regulations based on the experience, and staff will present the City Council with an ordinance to make the program permanent."

Staff's memo notes that micro-units "are typically small studio apartments, usually less than 350 square feet, with a fully functioning and accessibility-compliant kitchen and bathroom."

Sponsor

Sponsor

With some Long Beach neighborhoods still experiencing the results of previous Council policies that allowed "crackerbox" apartment density, what about parking for "micro units"? City staff's memo acknolwedges that parking per unit requirements "may need to be further evaluated." It says residential units "are generally parked at a rate of one space per unit plus one guest parking space per four units. The physical space required for this parking can exceed the living area of the micro unit in some circumstances, and is a contributing factor to high housing costs. Parking lifts, shared parking, alternative mobility solutions (bus, train, bike, scooter, walk) and parking reductions are all possible solutions to these parking requirements."

It notes that the downtown area allows projects within the "Alternative Mobility Overlay" to offer reduced parking with "Traffic Demand Management (TDM) strategies such as "car sharing, carpool, unbundled parking, and shared parking, subject to Site Plan Review Committee approval." Staff says similar TDM strategies are also allowed in SEASP and in Midtown with Site Plan Review Committee approval, and in addition, micro-units that include some income-restricted affordable units "can take advantage of parking reductions permitted by the State Density Bonus Law (Government Code §65915)."

[City staff memo] Micro-unit projects tend to be located in highly-desirable locations, close to public transit, with a variety of quality amenities to attract prospective occupants. As such, micro-units offer the added benefit of a reduction of vehicle-miles traveled (VMT) by bringing housing closer to jobs and other daily destinations. [footnote omitted] Micro-units also address a niche in the housing market that is currently underserved. By offering a previously unavailable housing choice to single-person households, which helps reduce the demand pressure on multi-family and single-family housing, micro-units can help stabilize rents.

While micro-units offer a number of benefits, there are concerns relating to their size and livability. Research conducted by staff demonstrated the importance of both neighborhood and building amenities to offset the size and livability concerns of a micro-unit. An ordinance to allow this housing type can be crafted to ensure that ample amenities are provided. More specifically, a pilot program to introduce this type of housing into the City's existing housing market would enable staff to test the regulations in a controlled setting where micro-units are appropriate and adjust accordingly.

City staff says its currently contemplated micro-unit ordinance [which, when unveiled, a Council majority could approve, tweak or not pursue] "would be an interim pilot program that allows a certain number of micro-units in the Downtown, Midtown, and Southeast areas of the City. Specifically, the following would be considered as part of interim regulations for a micro-unit pilot project:

Sponsor

Sponsor

Establish a Micro-unit Definition The Zoning Code currently does not have a definition of a "micro-unit." "The Building Code ultimately determines the minimum unit size, which is 220 square feet per unit. Research on micro-units supports the conclusion that a minimum unit size of 300 square feet ensures a livable space that includes adequate kitchen and bathroom facilities and built-in storage areas. A definition would be established to address the size requirements and other features of micro-units and micro-unit projects.

Establish Geographic or Locational Criteria. Staff's research found that microunit projects tend to be the most feasible and successful in areas that permit a density of approximately 100 dwelling units per acre (or approximately one unit for every 435 square feet of lot area), allowing for appropriate densities while ensuring adequate unit sizes and project amenities. Areas of Long Beach that currently permit those densities include Downtown (PD-30), the Downtown Shoreline area (PD-6), Midtown, and the Southeast, and are likely the best candidates for a microunit pilot program. Proximity to transit, public parks, and other public facilities and institutional uses are also important criteria when considering the location of microunit projects to ensure the livability of these projects for their residents.

Sponsor


Establish a Unit Cap. The micro-unit pilot program will establish a cap on the total number of micro-units that can be constructed under the interim regulations. Currently, 500 units is being contemplated for the unit cap. This number of units permits the City to gain experience with a number of projects (5 to 10 projects, depending on the size of the projects) as a means to test and finetune the regulations, prior to establishing more permanent regulations. The ordinance will also establish appropriate unit mix requirements, allowing 100 percent micro-unit projects to be tested in appropriate locations such as Downtown while a mix of micro, 1-, 2- and 3-bedroom units would be allowed in projects outside of Downtown.

Reconcile Existing Minimum Unit Size Requirements that Would Preclude Micro-units. The areas that are the best candidates for a micro-unit pilot program are regulated by specific plans or planned development districts that require a minimum unit size of 600 square feet. A pilot program could exempt micro-units from the minimum unit size requirement and allow smaller unit sizes. The areas prime for micro-units do allow for a reduction of the minimum unit size to 450 square feet, provided the Site Plan Review Committee finds the units are high quality with sufficient amenities, private open space requirements not be waived or reduced, and that not more than 15 percent of the total units in the project be a minimum of 450 square feet. The micro-unit pilot program could be crafted to exempt micro-unit projects from the unit size and unit mix requirements, in addition to crafting more suitable open space requirements (see Open Space discussion below).

Relax Density Limits. Generally, in multi-family residential zones of the City, the number of permitted dwelling units is determined by density, which is the number of dwelling units allowed on a site based on the size of the lot and the required site area per unit. The micro-unit pilot program is generally proposed in areas that allow for density of approximately 100 dwelling units per acre. In most of the Downtown, Midtown, and Southeast Area Specific Plan (SEASP) areas, where the pilot is being considered, there are no density limits; development is limited instead by Floor Area Ratios (FARs) and height limits, with a maximum allocation of trips also governing the amount of development in mixed-use areas in SEASP. Where density limitations would preclude a micro-unit project, the State Density Bonus Law can also provide relief, in some instances. The State Density Bonus Law allows up to a 35 percent density bonus in exchange for providing a percentage of affordable units. However, depending on the density limitations, a 35 percent density bonus may, or may not, allow a micro-unit project to achieve densities that make such projects viable.

Sponsor

Sponsor

Utilize Density Bonuses to Address Floor Area Ratio and Height Limits. Similar to considerations around density, restrictive FARs and height limits can create barriers to micro-unit projects. While this may be a consideration in other parts of the City, the areas that are the likely candidates for the micro-unit pilot generally have more permissive FARs and heights. As it relates to height, for example, in the PD-30 zone, height limits are generous and range from 80’ to 240’, except for in the Downtown Neighborhood Overlay, which contains a 38’ height limit. In Midtown, the height limits are tiered based on parcel depth and development districts. The Medical District, for example, has no height limit. The other three development districts (Transit Node Height, Transit Node Low, and Corridor) have height limits that generally range from three stories (36’) to five stories (65’), depending on whether the parcel depth is under 200’, or 200’ and over. The height limits in SEASP generally range between three to five stories. Where height and FAR requirements may pose a challenge, limited height and FAR incentives may be granted through the State Density Bonus law to help micro-unit projects achieve necessary heights and FARs in exchange for restricted affordable units.

Adjust Open Space Requirements. Open space requirements are typically assessed as a square footage amount per dwelling unit. As it pertains to micro-unit projects, these regulations could result in a substantial amount of required open space that could render such projects infeasible. The micro-unit pilot program could swap conventional per-unit open space requirements with an alternative open space requirement that emphasizes common areas to ensure the livability of this housing type for future residents. Specific requirements for high quality amenities will be necessary to assure the needs of future residents within these buildings are met.

Address Parking Through TDM and Density Bonus. As discussed above, perunit requirements can present a regulatory hurdle for micro-unit projects by virtue of the high density typically associated with these projects. Parking is another per-unit requirement that may need to be further evaluated. Residential units are generally parked at a rate of one space per unit plus one guest parking space per four units. The physical space required for this parking can exceed the living area of the micro unit in some circumstances, and is a contributing factor to high housing costs. Parking lifts, shared parking, alternative mobility solutions (bus, train, bike, scooter, walk) and parking reductions are all possible solutions to these parking requirements. In the Downtown area, for example, projects within the Alternative Mobility Overlay are eligible for a parking reduction by incorporating Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies such as car sharing, carpool, unbundled parking, and shared parking, subject to Site Plan Review Committee approval. Similar TDM strategies for parking reduction are also allowed in SEASP and in Midtown with Site Plan Review Committee approval. Outside of incorporation of TDM strategies for a reduction in parking, as mentioned previously, micro-units incorporating income-restricted affordable units can take advantage of parking reductions permitted by the State Density Bonus Law (Government Code §65915).

Amnesia File: At the May 2, 2017 City Council meeting at which staff presented its 29 affordable housing policy recommendations to the Council, Mayor Garcia commented: "The fact that we're talking about micro units, which I do believe there's an opportunity to build in the appropriate areas denser units at a lower costs if we look at our code and what we allow as faar as the size of units that we allow to be built."

Mr. Fox, who took part in community input study sessions for the Report, testified at the May 2, 2017 Council meeting in his capacity as CONO's Executive Director and commended city staff for incorporating CONO's suggestions in the Report.


Support really independent news in Long Beach. No one in LBREPORT.com's ownership, reporting or editorial decision-making has ties to development interests, advocacy groups or other special interests; or is seeking or receiving benefits of City development-related decisions; or holds a City Hall appointive position; or has contributed sums to political campaigns for Long Beach incumbents or challengers. LBREPORT.com isn't part of an out of town corporate cluster and no one its ownership, editorial or publishing decisionmaking has been part of the governing board of any City government body or other entity on whose policies we report. LBREPORT.com is reader and advertiser supported. You can help keep really independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.


blog comments powered by Disqus

Recommend LBREPORT.com to your Facebook friends:


Follow LBReport.com with:

Twitter

Facebook

RSS

Return To Front Page

Contact us: mail@LBReport.com



Adoptable pet of the week:




Copyright © 2020 LBReport.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use/Legal policy, click here. Privacy Policy, click here