Paid advocacy ad

Did you know that the City of Long Beach plans to build a giant aquatics center on the beach in Belmont Shore?

The Belmont Beach Aquatics Center, with 2 Olympic-size pools and a platform diving pool, will cost $82 million and was approved in January 2020 by Long Beach City Council. The project must now get permits from the California Coastal Commission because the project site is in the coastal zone.

The Coastal Commission is concerned that Long Beach residents from under-served communities
were not adequately consulted and considered during the planning and approval of this pool project.

THEY WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU!

HOW: We urge you, and your friends and neighbors, to send your email comments to the California Coastal Commission by 02/04/21. Send it to:dani.ziff@coastal.ca.gov

Subject Line: Public Comment on 02/04/21 - Agenda Item Th14a - Application No. 5-18-0788

WHEN: Write to them by 2/4/21! The public hearing date is Thursday, February 11th (9am to 7pm) and will be conducted electronically via ZOOM.

WHAT: Please ask them to stop this project on the beach, and to consult Long Beach residents all over the city to build it in a neighborhood that needs a community, public pool.

We’re a group of residents opposed to the project because of future sea-level rise (the beach site is expected to flood in 30-50 years), the cost ($82 million, from Tidelands Funds) and the fact that there’s already an existing outdoor pool at this site – installed 5 years ago when the old Belmont Pool was demolished in 2015.

But only you can tell the Coastal Commission that there are places in Long Beach with a greater need for recreation and sports facilities! The entire City of Long Beach has only 3 public pools Long Beach needs more community pools and this pool should be built in a neighborhood where more Long Beach residents can easily reach it to enjoy the benefits of swimming and recreation.

Please send your comments by 02/4/21 to the Coastal Commission at: dani.ziff@coastal.ca.gov

Subject Line: Public Comment on 2/4/21-Agenda Item Th14a - Application No. 5-18-0788

Paid for by Long Beach residents who believe there’s a better place in Long Beach for this public pool.
Contact us: ABetterPlaceForAPool@gmail.com

LBReport.com

News

16 Yr Old Boy Is Shot/Wounded, PCH/Pine, During Feb. 2 Council Meeting



If LBREPORT.com didn't tell you,
who would?
No one in LBREPORT.com's ownership, reporting or editorial decision-making has ties to development interests, advocacy groups or other special interests; or is seeking or receiving benefits of City development-related decisions; or holds a City Hall appointive position; or has contributed sums to political campaigns for Long Beach incumbents or challengers. LBREPORT.com isn't part of an out of town corporate cluster and no one its ownership, editorial or publishing decisionmaking has been part of the governing board of any City government body or other entity on whose policies we report.

LBREPORT.com is reader and advertiser supported. Support independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.
(February 2, 2021, 6:02 a.m..) -- A 16 year old boy was shot/wounded in the area of PCH/Pine Ave, (border CD 1/CD 6), during the Feb. 2 City Council meeting. CD1 Councilwoman Mary Zendejas mentioned the shooting during Council discussion of other recent shootings..

Initial information is very sketchy. Overnight Watch Commander Lt. Aaron Alu tells LBREPORT.com that at about 5:40 p.m. on Feb,. 2, officers were sent to a local hospital regarding a 16 year old boy with a non-life threatening gunshot wound. He had been brought to the hospital by a friend. The victim was last reported in stable condition. A crime scene was later located in the area of PCH/Pine Ave. There's no immediate suspect information. Gang Detectives responded to the scene (routine now for non-fatal shootings.) LBPD's investigation is ongoing.

During its Feb. 2 meeting, the Council took no action(s) on the multiple shootings (LBREPORT.com noted that shootings

per capita in CDs 6+8+9 combined exceeded Chicago, coverage here). No Caouncilmember(s) proposed to restore nearly 50 officers they'd voted (9-0) to defund in Sept. 2020, or to restore LBPD's field anti-gang unit (budget erased in 2013 and not restored), or to restore any other portion of 180+ officers erased in a 2009-2015 defunnding. The net effect of Council actions have left Long Beach with a thinner police level than Los Angeles, Santa Monica and Signal Hill..

Instead. Councilmembers recited their verbal commitment to public safety and approved an agenda item (brought by Zendejas and Allen) to ask city management "to work with all appropriate departments to report back to the Council within 30 days on violent and quality-of-life crime in Long Beach with an overview of incidents and trends, an outline of current efforts and opportunities to address violence in highly-impacted neighborhoods, and a plan of action."

LBPD Chief Robert Luna indicated he would be among those speaking to the item when it returns within 30 days and signaled that he plans to address policies outside Long Beach that he said are impacting crime inside Long Beach..

[Scroll down for further.]




e


The only public speaker was LBREPORT.com publisher Bill Pearl, who offered three constructive suggestions:

(1) Add shootings to LBPD's publicly released crime stats. (LBREPORT.com has editorially criticized the City's failure to list shootings among LBPD crime stats. Pearl noted that the City of Los Angeles does list shootings in its crime stats and commented that LB residents shouldn't have to make Public Records Act requests to access neighborhood impacting shooting data);

(2) Restore monthly reports that show crimes by Council districts, allowing residents to compare crimes in each Council district. The City previously routinely issued these statistics but ended the practice under former Mayor Beverly O'Neill. (Pearl commented: If LB has current Councilmembers who want to prevent the public from knowing these facts, let's find out who they are.).

(3) Begin collecting data on the victims of NON-police shootings [as in gang shootings] in the same way as the City collects data re police officer-involved shootings. ("Those victims [of non-police shootings] matter too," Pearl commented.

No Councilmember(s) commented or followed-up on publisher Pearl's suggested actions.

Sponsor

Sponsor

Sponsor

Sponsor

Sponsor



Support really independent news in Long Beach. No one in LBREPORT.com's ownership, reporting or editorial decision-making has ties to development interests, advocacy groups or other special interests; or is seeking or receiving benefits of City development-related decisions; or holds a City Hall appointive position; or has contributed sums to political campaigns for Long Beach incumbents or challengers. LBREPORT.com isn't part of an out of town corporate cluster and no one its ownership, editorial or publishing decisionmaking has been part of the governing board of any City government body or other entity on whose policies we report. LBREPORT.com is reader and advertiser supported. You can help keep really independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.


blog comments powered by Disqus

Recommend LBREPORT.com to your Facebook friends:


Follow LBReport.com with:

Twitter

Facebook

RSS

Return To Front Page

Contact us: mail@LBReport.com



Adoptable pet of the week:




Copyright © 2021 LBReport.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use/Legal policy, click here. Privacy Policy, click here