Paid advocacy ad

Did you know that the City of Long Beach plans to build a giant aquatics center on the beach in Belmont Shore?

The Belmont Beach Aquatics Center, with 2 Olympic-size pools and a platform diving pool, will cost $82 million and was approved in January 2020 by Long Beach City Council. The project must now get permits from the California Coastal Commission because the project site is in the coastal zone.

The Coastal Commission is concerned that Long Beach residents from under-served communities
were not adequately consulted and considered during the planning and approval of this pool project.

THEY WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU!

HOW: We urge you, and your friends and neighbors, to send your email comments to the California Coastal Commission by 02/04/21. Send it to:dani.ziff@coastal.ca.gov

Subject Line: Public Comment on 02/04/21 - Agenda Item Th14a - Application No. 5-18-0788

WHEN: Write to them by 2/4/21! The public hearing date is Thursday, February 11th (9am to 7pm) and will be conducted electronically via ZOOM.

WHAT: Please ask them to stop this project on the beach, and to consult Long Beach residents all over the city to build it in a neighborhood that needs a community, public pool.

We’re a group of residents opposed to the project because of future sea-level rise (the beach site is expected to flood in 30-50 years), the cost ($82 million, from Tidelands Funds) and the fact that there’s already an existing outdoor pool at this site – installed 5 years ago when the old Belmont Pool was demolished in 2015.

But only you can tell the Coastal Commission that there are places in Long Beach with a greater need for recreation and sports facilities! The entire City of Long Beach has only 3 public pools Long Beach needs more community pools and this pool should be built in a neighborhood where more Long Beach residents can easily reach it to enjoy the benefits of swimming and recreation.

Please send your comments by 02/4/21 to the Coastal Commission at: dani.ziff@coastal.ca.gov

Subject Line: Public Comment on 2/4/21-Agenda Item Th14a - Application No. 5-18-0788

Paid for by Long Beach residents who believe there’s a better place in Long Beach for this public pool.
Contact us: ABetterPlaceForAPool@gmail.com

LBReport.com

News

City of Long Beach Says It May Delay Second Shots Of COVID-19 Vaccine For Up To Six Weeks/42 Days. Compare What City Media Release Says With What CDC Says



If LBREPORT.com didn't tell you,
who would?
No one in LBREPORT.com's ownership, reporting or editorial decision-making has ties to development interests, advocacy groups or other special interests; or is seeking or receiving benefits of City development-related decisions; or holds a City Hall appointive position; or has contributed sums to political campaigns for Long Beach incumbents or challengers. LBREPORT.com isn't part of an out of town corporate cluster and no one its ownership, editorial or publishing decisionmaking has been part of the governing board of any City government body or other entity on whose policies we report.

LBREPORT.com is reader and advertiser supported. Support independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.
(February 1, 2021, 9:10 p.m.) -- LBHREPORT.com has learned that the City of Long Beach has begun informing individuals who received their first of two COVID-19 shots through the City that their second shot, needed for full vaccine protection, may not come within two or three weeks as recommended but may be delayed for up to six weeka/42 days.

The six week interval is NOT recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) but the agency says it is acceptable if it isn't "feasible" to adhere to the recommended interval (3 weeks for Pfizer, 4 weeks for Moderna.).

LBREPORT.con has learned that an ELB medical professional is among those the City has informed they may not receive their second shot for up to six weeks (42 days). [If you're aware of individuals in the medical or any other fields who've received similar notifications from the City, kindly let us know via email to mail@LBReport.com]

On Jan 29, the City issued a media release indicating it will begin administering its second shots on Feb. 1. LBREPORT.com contrasts below what the City says in its Jan, 29 press release -- which doesn't actually say the City will delay second doses for up to 42 days -- with what the CDC > says on its website.

City of LB Jan,. 29 media release

...The COVID-19 vaccine is administered in two doses. The Health Department will be contacting people who received vaccination through the Health Department throughout February...to schedule an appointment for their second dose...While it is recommended for second doses to be administered within a 21- to 28- day period depending on the manufacturer, guidance provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) indicates that the effectiveness is not reduced if the second dose is received within six weeks of the first dose, or up to 42 days. February clinic appointments will be dedicated first to allocation of second doses. The amount of vaccine the City receives varies week by week, and people are encouraged to get their second vaccine as soon as they are notified of availability. The City is prioritizing second doses and is requesting vaccine from the State to complete all second doses.

CDC website text (viewed Feb. 1, 2021)

These interim CDC clinical considerations are informed by data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the vaccines, other data sources, general best practice guidelines for immunization, and expert opinion.

The mRNA COVID-19 vaccine series consist of two doses administered intramuscularly:

Pfizer-BioNTech (30 µg, 0.3 ml each): 3 weeks (21 days) apart
Moderna (100 µg, 0.5 ml): 1 month (28 days) apart

...The second dose should be administered as close to the recommended interval as possible. However, if it is not feasible to adhere to the recommended interval, the second dose of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines may be scheduled for administration up to 6 weeks (42 days) after the first dose. There are currently limited data on efficacy of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines administered beyond this window. If the second dose is administered beyond these intervals, there is no need to restart the series.

Administration Summary:

CDC continues to recommend that people get their second dose of COVID-19 vaccine as close to the recommended interval as possible?(3 weeks for Pfizer-BioNTech, and one month for Moderna). CDC’s updated guidance was revised to allow for second dose administration up to 6 weeks (42 days) after the first if it is not feasible to adhere to the recommended interval. CDC is not advocating for people to delay getting their second dose, but the data from clinical trials support this range

.



e


Related coverage:

  • Nat'l Vaccine Shortage + Outcome Of Mayor Garcia Vax Policy = No LB First Vaccine Doses In February and Possibly March

  • City Bent COVID-19 Vaccine Rules To Let LB Mayor, Councilmembers Get Vaccinations Ahead of Prioritized Others

  • For Several Days LB Health Dept. Quietly Gave Vaccinations At Day's End To Some Without Appointments

  • City of Long Beach Spox Admits It Has 15,000 Persons On Its 65+ Vax "Waiting List"

  • Read Details Of Gov Newsom's Newly Imposed "My Turn" Vax Distrib System; It's "Don't Call Us, We'll Call You" System Letting Sac'to Decide Who Gets Vax'd Locally And When; City Hall Implements Via Its "VaxLB" Page

  • Statement by the Publisher: I'm 65+, Immune Compromised With Underlying Health Issue. I Sought Vaccine Appt'ment Jan. 14. Some Got Vax'd But I Got Nothing And Undisclosed Number Of Others Got Digital Brushoff...And See What City Staffers Offered Me (And I Refused)

  • LB Health Dept. Will Use/Distribute Vaccine Lot In Which Multiple Potential Adverse Events Reported When Used Elsewhere; City Says CDC & Sac'to Have Cleared It For Use

  • Gov. Newsom Says Sac'to System Will Control/Tell Residents When/Where They Can Get COVID-19 Vaccines, Also Lifts Statewide Lockdown To LA County (Despite Purple/Virus Widespread Category) To Resume Outdoor Dining, Outdoor Gyns, Hair Salons

  • City Of Long Beach Now Admits Roughly a Fifth Of Its Residents -- Those Deemed At High Risk (Age 65+, Food Workers and Education Employees) -- May Not Get Vax'd For "Several Weeks"

  • LBUSD Has Only Roughly 1,000 Vaccine Doses Currently Available For Jan 25 Vaxing Of Teachers/Related Staff Touted By Mayor Garcia

  • Publisher's First Person: Mayor Garcia. City Mgr. Mum When Asked How Many Persons Are Now On City's COVID-19 "Waiting Lists" For Vaccine App'tments, How Many Are Between Ages 65-74 (CDC Priority), And With Whom Mayor/Mgr Have Communicated In DC and/or Sac'to to Increase LB Vax Supply Naming Names And Responses

  • Publisher's First Person: We Heard Some Vaccine Was Available Thru LB Convention Ctr Webpage. We Tried. Here's What Happened

  • LBREPORT.com Makes Public Records Request Seeking Docs Disclosing City's Vaccine Levels, Who Got It, And How; And Today Asks Mayor And City Mgr To Publicly Disclose Number of Residents On City's Vaccine Appointment "Waiting List"

  • Publisher's First Person: While Mayor Holds Mass Vaccination Media Event And Some Age 65+ Are Vax'd, Many Others Report Digital Brushoffs And Delays That May Extend Into February

    Publisher's First Person:Long Beach Mayor/City Hall Mgm't Get Vax, Some Residents Get App'tments, Others Say They Got Email/Voice Mail/Digital Brush-offs. I'm 65+ And Here's What I Encountered

  • LA County Health Dept. Warns Of COVID-19 Outbreaks Linked To Workplaces Incl. Grocery Stores, Warehouses, Manufacturing And Logistics Facilities, Also Cites Increases In School Daycare Settings
    Sponsor

    Sponsor

    Sponsor

    Sponsor

    Sponsor



    Support really independent news in Long Beach. No one in LBREPORT.com's ownership, reporting or editorial decision-making has ties to development interests, advocacy groups or other special interests; or is seeking or receiving benefits of City development-related decisions; or holds a City Hall appointive position; or has contributed sums to political campaigns for Long Beach incumbents or challengers. LBREPORT.com isn't part of an out of town corporate cluster and no one its ownership, editorial or publishing decisionmaking has been part of the governing board of any City government body or other entity on whose policies we report. LBREPORT.com is reader and advertiser supported. You can help keep really independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.


    blog comments powered by Disqus

    Recommend LBREPORT.com to your Facebook friends:


    Follow LBReport.com with:

    Twitter

    Facebook

    RSS

    Return To Front Page

    Contact us: mail@LBReport.com



  • Adoptable pet of the week:




    Copyright © 2021 LBReport.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use/Legal policy, click here. Privacy Policy, click here