Ooops, We Nearly Forgot To Include THIS 2020 Outrage: Runners-Up For 2020 Outrages Of The Year; "Long Beach State Senator Lena Gonzalez Votes To Kill SB 640 That Would Have Allowed Intervention To Treat Severely Mentally Ill Homeless."
|LBREPORT.com's "2020 Outrage of the Year" and its runners-up reflect the opinion of LBREPORT.com, LLC.
(January 4, 2021, 6:15 a.m.) - LBREPORT.com nearly forgot to include the story below among runners-up for "2020 Outrage of the Year." "Long Beach State Senator Lena Gonzalez Votes To Kill SB 640 That Would Have Allowed Intervention To Treat Severely Mentally Ill Homeless."
The story, reported by LBREPORT.com on Jan. 12, 2020 is below. We noted in a publisher's preface that "Current CA law leaves severely mentally ill homeless persons, a number of whom may be helped with medications, untreated to wander helplessly and try to survive on the streets. LBREPORT.com has previously reported in detail (here and here) on SB 640, a Sacramento bill that proposed to change the status quo. LBREPORT.com now reports on what recently happened to SB 640."
We add this epilogue: Sen. Moorlach was defeated in his November 2020 re-election run. He's now seeking election to fill a vacancy on the OC Board of Supervisors.
(Jan. 12, 2020, 4:30 p.m.) -- Long Beach state Senator (former LB City Councilwoman) Lena Gonzalez (D, LB-SE L.A. County) voted as a member of the state Senate Health Committee to prevent the advance of SB 640) that sought to amend current CA law permitting the involuntarily treatment of gravely disabled persons to include persons so severely mentally ill they can't take care of themselves (details below.)
SB 640 by state Senator John Moorlach (R, Irvine/Costa Mesa) sought to amend the definition in CA's Lanterman-Petris-Short Act of "gravely disabled" to include persons who suffer from [legislative counsel's digest] "a condition in which a person, as a result of a mental health disorder, is incapable of making informed decisions about, or providing for, the person's own basic personal needs for food, clothing, shelter, or medical care or shelter without significant supervision and assistance from another person and, as a result of being incapable of making these informed decisions, the person is at risk of substantial bodily harm, dangerous worsening of a concomitant serious physical illness, significant psychiatric deterioration, or mismanagement of the person’s essential needs that could result in bodily harm."
At a Jan. 8, 2020 Health Committee hearing, five affirmative Committee votes were needed to advance SB 640 to the Senate Judiciary Committee for further discussion and possible amendments. Two Health Committee members (one Democrat and one Republican) voted "yes"; two Democrats (one of whom was Senator Gonzalez) voted "no"; four Democrats (including the Committee chair) remained silent. The resulting
[Scroll down for further.]
SB 640 had the support of [source: Health Committee legislative analysis] the California District Attorneys Association. California Police Chiefs Association, City of Fullerton, City of Santa Monica, MentalIllnessPolicy.org, NAMI [National Alliance on Mental Illness] Sacramento, Schizophrenia and Related Disorders Alliance of America, Westside Council of Chambers of Commerce and two individuals.
It was opposed by the California Hospital Association (unless amended), County Behavioral Health Directors Association of California Disability Rights California, Mental Health America of Northern California and SEIU California. [Gonzalez received a $9,300 contribution (the maximum) in her 2019 state Senate campaign from SEIU Local 2015 State PAC.]
Senator Moorlach's stated need for the bill (as listed in the Senate Health Committee's legislative analysis) states:
...California is failing its seriously mentally ill. Current law states that a person is gravely disabled if, as a result of a mental health disorder, he or she cannot provide for their basic needs for food, clothing, and shelter. This law was intended to serve as a protection to individual liberties but has created a system that, instead of helping the most seriously mentally ill, relegates them to the streets, jails, and emergency rooms. Better metrics are needed to help seriously mentally ill individuals that are simply powerless to provide for their own personal well-being. This is especially important when the absence of significant supervision and assistance leaves the individual at risk of substantial bodily harm. Clarifying the definition of “gravely disabled” will be a step towards repairing a system that is failing to serve those who need it most.
The full Jan. 8, 2020 state Senate Health Committee legislative analysis of SB 640 is visible here. \
SB 640 received "yes" votes from state Senator Shannon Grove, (R, southern central valley/high desert) and state Senator Melissa Hurtado (D, Fresno-Bakersfield) and needed three additional affirmative votes to advance. Committee chair Senator Richard Pan (D, Sacramento) joined by Senators Holly Mitchell (D, Los Angeles), Susan Rubio (D, Baldwin Park) and William Monning (D, Central Coast) remained silent. State Senators Lena Gonzalez (D, Long Beach-SE L.A. County) and Connie Leyva (D, Inland Empire) voted "no."
The resulting 2-2 vote effectively killed SB 640.
Following the 2-2 vote to block SB 640's advance, the Committee voted to grant the bill "reconsideration" but under current timelines it was a near empty gesture legislatively; SB 640 was "double-referred" to the state Senate Judiciary Committee meaning it had to pass both Committees by Jan. 24, 2020, which the Health Committee's vote precluded.
The Health Committee's action wasn't a complete surprise. In April 2019 [prior to the election of Sen. Gonzalez], the same Committee held a "testimony only" hearing on SB 640 at which Committee Democrats politely thanked Senator Moorlach and his witnesses (who pleaded for Committee passage of SB 640) but raised various objections to the bill. To see/hear in detail what took place, see VIDEO below:
Although SB 640 had been pending since Feb. 2019 and LB Mayor Robert Garcia and City Councilmembers frequently cite homelessness as a major Long Beach issue, the City took no position on SB 640.
The LB City Council's "State Legislation Committee" chaired by Councilman Al Austin didn't discuss SB 640; it held no meetings on any matter during the 2019 state legislative session. No other Council committee or Mayor-chosen "advisory commission" discussed SB 640.
Any of LB's nine City Councilmembers (whose votes set city policy) or Mayor Garcia (who has no policy-setting vote) could have agendized SB 640 for City Council discussion and voted to take a position on SB 640 "on any Tuesday." None did.
In a November 2019 audio interview with LBREPORT.com (here), Senator Moorlach indicated he'd welcome support from Long Beach. On January 10, 2020, LBREPORT.com asked Senator Moorlach's office if any officials from the City of LB had contacted them about SB 640; we were told none had done so.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Recommend LBREPORT.com to your Facebook friends:
Follow LBReport.com with:
Contact us: mail@LBReport.com