Council Approves Spending $8.6 Mil On "Safety Recovery Plan" That Doesn't Restore Any Of Roughly 230 Erased/Formerly Budgeted Police
If LBREPORT.com didn't tell you, who would?
No one in LBREPORT.com's ownership, reporting or editorial decision-making has ties to development interests, advocacy groups or other special interests; or is seeking or receiving benefits of City development-related decisions; or holds a City Hall appointive position; or has contributed sums to political campaigns for Long Beach incumbents or challengers. LBREPORT.com isn't part of an out of town corporate cluster and no one its ownership, editorial or publishing decisionmaking has been part of the governing board of any City government body or other entity on whose policies we report.
LBREPORT.com is reader and advertiser supported. Support independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.
(July 21, 2021, 7:45 p.m.) -- On July 19, the City Council voted 8-0 (Austin absent) to approve a City Manager/Mayor proposed "Safety Recovery Plan" that spends $8.6 million without restoring any of roughly 230 police officers that prior Long Beach Council budgets erased.
The result leaves LB taxpayers with a thinner per capita officer level than provided by City Councils in nearby cities. Under the plan, the City will spend roughly $4 million for non-police items labeled "prevention" that multiple public speakers supported.
Several public speakers opposed spending sums to maintain current police base staffing (depleted by responses to recent shootings) and urged reducing LBPD funding even further. Some said Long Beach is over-policed.
No public speakers came to the podium to speak in support of maintaining or backfilling current items sought by LBPD management.
LBREPORT.com chart below shows LB's budgeted police level prior to the Council's FY 21 (Sept. 2020) defunding of 48 officers.
LB city management has previously indicated to LBREPORT.com that restoring 10 officers "fully turned out" (including necessary equipment) can be roughly estimated for budget purposes to cost $2 million. (City management's proposed FY22 budget and Safety Recovery Plan don't include an updated figure.)
Although the Council requested plan comes in response to increased shootings, it doesn't propose to begin reporting shootings in LBPD's official crime statistics, a number currently buried within "aggravated assaults." LAPD reports shootings including their general location; LBPD doesn't.
[Scroll down for further.]
The Council approved plan includes nearly $500 million in non-police Parks and Rec items it labels "prevention" but includes no evidence indicating they'll prevent or reduce shootings and no metrics on how to judge the spending's success or failure.
Below are some examples:
$250,000 for Midnight Basketball, Playground Partners, and Summer Nights-type programs [agendizing memo text] "where sworn staff can engage with the city's youth in a fun, low-pressure environment to support building rapport and trust" and "proposes to implement partnerships with local community-based organizations (CBOs) to provide opportunities for Police Department staff to engage and make connections with community youth in a safe and fun environment."
$110,000 for "Be S.A.F.E. Expansion." The program, operated for the past five years, doesn't propose to eliminate a gang presence or vagrant presence from neighborhood parks,. Thus far it has offered [agendizing memo text] "activities such as games, sports, arts and crafts, and movies that children, teens, and adults can enjoy during the summer evening hours." The agendizing memo asserts, but provides no evidence, that "Be S.A.F.E. has proven to be vital to residents that want to enjoy their neighborhood park with their children, neighbors, friends, and fellow community members." Parks/Rec currently offers the BE S.A.F.E. program at 11 park sites throughout the city" and "additional funds would allow for the expansion of the program to parks in the Central/West and North Long Beach neighborhoods where dense populations require more opportunities for safe recreational opportunities" and "allow PRM staff to provide additional resources that focus on mental health, parenting skills, and family relationship activities."
$100,00 For "Safe Passage- Violence Interruption". As described in city staffs agendizing memo, the program's "objective" is to "create a multi-agency enforcement partnership to provide safety from gang-related crimes against youth and families on specific streets, schools, at bus stops, and public spaces (parks, open spaces, etc.)" with no indication of how this will be accomplished. "A Safe Passage program...ia most successful if implemented as one component of a multi-faceted community safety strategy such as a violence interrupter model [no offered details on "violence interrupter model."] "A structured Safe Passage program allows schools, law enforcement, and community residents to pinpoint "hot spots" for gang and related trouble on and around school campuses, parks, and other identified spaces [once "pinpointed," what follows?] "The Safe Passage program has been previously implemented by the City [no offered evidence of specific locations and program's success or failure] and the intent now is to expand the program to parks and other commercial spaces. "This program places community residents as the solution-makers in their neighborhoods [what types of "solutions"?] and works best when paired with the violence interrupter model (Be S.A.F.E.) [no offered evidence of success or failure or metrics to measure this.] PRM seeks $25,000 for four neighborhoods (one-time funding of $100,000.)
$60,000 for "Civics Training and Leadership Development Activities." [Agendizing memo text] "Modeled after Chicago-based My Block My Hood My City, [Chicago with its scandalous toll of fatal and non-fatal shootings is a poor example for Long Beach to follow] youth will participate in civics training and leadership development activities designed to raise awareness of local resources, raise historical knowledge, and increase community pride. Youth will be trained on how to coordinate community tours that further foster a sense of pride in neighborhoods such North Long Beach and the Washington Neighborhood. This work will be led in partnership with local CBOs such as the Youth Leadership Institute, Californians for Justice, and Historical Long Beach Society. Possible City department partnerships include PGWIN, Library Services, Development Services, and Health. This project can have high visibility and will require the coverage of some City staff time, leadership materials and youth stipends, and the partnership with a local CBO."
$3.63 million in proposed FY 22 spending for items vaguely described as "a longer term strategy for violence prevention." Spending items aren't described. They're simply listed as proposed expenditures: "Youth Academic Programming" ($810,000), "Youth Life Coaching and Mentoring" ($300,000), "Youth Health and Safety Programming" ($990,000), "Community Interventionist Program" ($450,000), "Re-Entry Program Pilot" ($540,000), "Mental Health Crisis Response Pilot ($540,000).<;i>
Support really independent news in Long Beach. No one in LBREPORT.com's ownership, reporting or editorial decision-making has ties to development interests, advocacy groups or other special interests; or is seeking or receiving benefits of City development-related decisions; or holds a City Hall appointive position; or has contributed sums to political campaigns for Long Beach incumbents or challengers. LBREPORT.com isn't part of an out of town corporate cluster and no one its ownership, editorial or publishing decisionmaking has been part of the governing board of any City government body or other entity on whose policies we report. LBREPORT.com is reader and advertiser supported. You can help keep really independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.