LBReport.com

News

Sac'to Bill Would Prevent City from Requiring Or Enforcing Minimum Parking Req'ts on Residential, Comm'l or Other Developments W/In Half Mile Walking Distance of Public Transit. It Passed Ass'y 51-17 (O'Donnell Voted "No"; Rendon Voted "Yes": Gipson "No Vote Recorded"); City Council Let It Advance Without Opposition And It's Now In State Senate

If LBREPORT.com didn't tell you,
who would?
No one in LBREPORT.com's ownership, reporting or editorial decision-making has ties to development interests, advocacy groups or other special interests; or is seeking or receiving benefits of City development-related decisions; or holds a City Hall appointive position; or has contributed sums to political campaigns for Long Beach incumbents or challengers. LBREPORT.com isn't part of an out of town corporate cluster and no one its ownership, editorial or publishing decisionmaking has been part of the governing board of any City government body or other entity on whose policies we report.

LBREPORT.com is reader and advertiser supported. Support independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.
(June 6, 2021, 6:40 p.m.) -- Without opposition by the City of Long Beach (via city staff or City Council action), a Sacramento bill -- AB 1401 -- that would prevent cities from requiring or enforcing minimum parking requirements for residential, commercial or other developments within a half mile walking distance of public transit has passed the Assembly.

AB 1401 specifies:

[AB 1401 current text] 65863.3. (a) A local government shall not impose a minimum automobile parking requirement, or enforce a minimum automobile parking requirement, on residential, commercial, or other development if the parcel is located within one-half mile walking distance of public transit.

(b) When a project provides parking voluntarily, nothing in this section shall preclude a local government from imposing requirements on that voluntary parking to require spaces for car share vehicles.

(c) Subdivision (a) shall not reduce, eliminate, or preclude the enforcement of any requirement imposed on a new multifamily residential or nonresidential development to provide electric vehicle parking spaces or parking spaces that are accessible to persons with disabilities that would have otherwise applied to the development if this section did not apply.

(d) For purposes of this section, “public transit” means either of the following: (1) A high-quality transit corridor as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code.

[LBREPORT.com note: Public Resources Code 21155: "...For purposes of this section, a high-quality transit corridor means a corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours. A project shall be considered to be within one-half mile of a major transit stop or high-quality transit corridor if all parcels within the project have no more than 25 percent of their area farther than one-half mile from the stop or corridor and if not more than 10 percent of the residential units or 100 units, whichever is less, in the project are farther than one-half mile from the stop or corridor."

(2) A major transit stop as defined in Section 21064.3 of the Public Resources Code.

[LBREPORT.com note: Public Resources Code 21064.3: "...For purposes of this section, a high-quality transit corridor means a corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours. A project shall be considered to be within one-half mile of a major transit stop or high-quality transit corridor if all parcels within the project have no more than 25 percent of their area farther than one-half mile from the stop or corridor and if not more than 10 percent of the residential units or 100 units, whichever is less, in the project are farther than one-half mile from the stop or corridor."

(e) The Legislature finds and declares that this section addresses a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair as that term is used in Section 5 of Article XI of the California Constitution. Therefore, this section applies to all cities, including charter cities.

In a June 1 Assembly floor vote, Assemblyman Patrick O'Donnell (D, LB) voted "no;" Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon (D, NLB/Paramount) voted "yes," Assemblyman Mike Gipson (D, NLB/Carson) was "no vote recorded." The full tally was 51-17 (with 11 "no vote recorded.")

Ayes: Aguiar-Curry, Arambula, Bennett, Berman, Bloom, Bryan, Burke, Calderon, Carrillo, Cervantes, Chau, Chen, Chiu, Cunningham, Daly, Fong, Friedman, Gabriel, Gallagher, Eduardo Garcia, Lorena Gonzalez, Gray, Grayson, Holden, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Kiley, Lackey, Lee, Low, McCarty, Medina, Mullin, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Ramos, Reyes, Luz Rivas, Robert Rivas, Rodriguez, Blanca Rubio, Salas, Stone, Ting, Villapudua, Voepel, Ward, Akilah Weber, Wicks, Wood, Rendon

Noes: Bigelow, Boerner Horvath, Choi, Megan Dahle, Davies, Flora, Irwin, Levine, Mathis, Muratsuchi, Nguyen, O'Donnell, Petrie-Norris, Seyarto, Smith, Valladares, Waldron

NVR: Bauer-Kahan, Cooley, Cooper, Frazier, Cristina Garcia, Gipson, Maienschein, Mayes, Nazarian, Patterson, Santiago

AB 1401 now awaits committee hearings in the state Senate.

[Scroll down for further.]










The City of Long Beach and its policy-setting Councilmembers have effctively let AB 1401, introduced Feb. 19, 2021, advance with no position by the City although it conflicts with parts of the City's "state legislative agenda" (general statements of City policy that city management is supposed to follow.)

Sponsor

The City's 2021 state legislative agenda states that the City of LB will "Oppose legislation that would reduce the City’s local land use authority" and legislation that "would reduce the City’s local land use authority and support implementation of the City Council adopted planning documents." Its details include:

a) Support policies and legislation that protect and/or expands the City’s authority and rights over its affairs. b) Oppose policies and legislation that preempt the current authority possessed by the City and delegates that authority to the State or other governmental jurisdiction... f) Oppose policies and legislation that diminish the City’s local control over land use, planning, zoning and development decisions, and oppose legislation in conflict with the City’s adopted General Plan or other Council adopted land use policies...

Sponsor


.

An April 27 legislative analysis (Assembly Housing and Community Development Committee) listed support and opposition as follows: more construction of apartment units."

Support

Abundant Housing LA (Co-Sponsor)
California YIMBY (Co-Sponsor)
Council of Infill Builders (Co-Sponsor)
SPUR (Co-Sponsor)
350 Bay Area Action
AARP
Active SGV, a Project of Community Partners
Bay Area Council
Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART)
Cal Asian Chamber of Commerce
California Downtown Association
California Interfaith Power & Light
California Restaurant Association
CA State University, Pomona, College of Environmental Design
Casita Coalition
CBIA
Central City Association
Chan Zuckerberg Initiative
Circulate San Diego
City Council Member, City of Gilroy
Civic Enterprise
Codding Enterprises
East Bay for Everyone
Fieldstead and Company, INC.
Greenbelt Alliance
Habitat for Humanity California
Hello Housing
Housing Action Coalition
Independent Hospitality Coalition
LISC San Diego
Local Government Commission
Long Beach YIMBY
MidPen Housing
Modular Building Institute
Mountain View YIMBY
Natural Resources Defense Council
Northern Neighbors
Parkade
Peninsula for Everyone
People for Housing - Orange County
Related California
San Fernando Valley YIMBY
San Francisco YIMBY
Santa Cruz YIMBY
Silicon Valley Leadership Group
South Bay YIMBY
Streets for All
Streets for People Bay Area
Terner Center for Housing Innovation at the University of California, Berkeley
The Two Hundred
TMG Partners
Transform
UC Berkeley School of Law's Center for Law, Energy, and the Environment
UCLA Department of Urban Planning
Urban Environmentalists
Urban Mix Development
West Third Street Parking and Public Improvement Association
YIMBY Action

Support If Amended
American Planning Association, California Chapter

Opposition

Albany Neighbors United
California Cities for Local Control
CA Contract Cities Ass'n
Century Glen HOA
City of Corona
City of Fountain Valley
City of Pleasanton
Livable California
Town of Truckee
Ventura Council of Governments

Sponsor

Sponsor


Support really independent news in Long Beach. No one in LBREPORT.com's ownership, reporting or editorial decision-making has ties to development interests, advocacy groups or other special interests; or is seeking or receiving benefits of City development-related decisions; or holds a City Hall appointive position; or has contributed sums to political campaigns for Long Beach incumbents or challengers. LBREPORT.com isn't part of an out of town corporate cluster and no one its ownership, editorial or publishing decisionmaking has been part of the governing board of any City government body or other entity on whose policies we report. LBREPORT.com is reader and advertiser supported. You can help keep really independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.


blog comments powered by Disqus

Recommend LBREPORT.com to your Facebook friends:


Follow LBReport.com with:

Twitter

Facebook

RSS

Return To Front Page

Contact us: mail@LBReport.com



Adoptable pet of the week:




Copyright © 2021 LBReport.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use/Legal policy, click here. Privacy Policy, click here