LBReport.com

News

Later Today, LB Will Learn If Measure A Sales Tax Extension Passed Or Failed; Updated Campaign Docs Show Mayor-Run Pro-Tax Committee Spent $638,000 Since January To Pass It Against No Organized Opposition


If LBREPORT.com didn't tell you,
who would?
No one in LBREPORT.com's ownership, reporting or editorial decision-making has ties to development interests, advocacy groups or other special interests; or is seeking or receiving benefits of City development-related decisions; or holds a City Hall appointive position; or has contributed sums to political campaigns for Long Beach incumbents or challengers. LBREPORT.com isn't part of an out of town corporate cluster and no one its ownership, editorial or publishing decisionmaking has been part of the governing board of any City government body or other entity on whose policies we report.

LBREPORT.com is reader and advertiser supported. Support independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.
(March 27, 2020, 7:30 a.m.) -- Later today, Long Beach will learn if the Measure A sales tax extension (sought by LB Mayor Garcia and the City Council) has passed or failed. In its most recent vote tally (Mar. 24), the measure was in a virtual dead-heat -- 50% to 50% -- trailing by nine votes with (at that time) 3,600 additional ballots countywide remaining to be counted.

NO 49,644 50.00%
YES 49,635 50.00%

The latest campaign filing report by the Mayor-Garcia run "Yes on A & B, Mayor Garcia Committee to Protect Police & Fire and Repair Infrastructure in Long Beach" shows that between Jan. 1 through March 3, 2020, it spent $638,866 to convince voters to approve the Mayor/Council-sought measure that sought to eliminate the 2016 sale tax's reduction date (2023) and end date (2027.)

The $638k sum doesn't include 2019 amounts spent by the Garcia-run committee for the measure (put on the ballot by a July 2019 Council vote without dissent. As previously reported in "Follow the Money" coverage by LBREPORT.com here here and here, the Garcia-run pro-Measure A committee's largest contributors were LB's police and firefighter unions.

The City of Long Beach separately paid $100,000 to a firm (Carrillo Strategies) to design, print and mail two fliers on Measures A & B sent to roughly 110,000 LB households. The City called its content informational (approved by the LB City Attorney's office and outside election counsel) that didn't explicitly advocate a "yes" or "no" vote on the measure. The City also inserted the flier in one cycle of city utility bills.

[Scroll down for further.]




There was no organized or competitively funded campaign committee in opposition to Measure A. Audible opponents consisted mainly of individual taxpayers who indicate they spent less than $1,000 for yard signs and hand-distributed fliers and also made comments on social networks.

Measure A was opposed by two Reform Ticket candidates in the March 3 election: Robert Fox (2nd dist.) and Juan Ovalle (8th dist.) Mr. Fox has advanced to a November 2020 runoff against Cindy Allen, backed by the Mayor/police-firefighter unions. In the March 24 tally, Mr. Ovalle was within 135 votes of advancing to a runoff against 8th district incumbent Al Austin (backed by the Mayor/police-firefighter unions) who'll face organized-labor backed Tunua Thrash-Ntuk in November.

Sponsor

Sponsor

As to the possibility of a recount challenging the Measure A final vote total expected later today, see LBREPORT.com coverage here.

Sponsor

Sponsor

Sponsor


Sponsor

Sponsor


Support really independent news in Long Beach. No one in LBREPORT.com's ownership, reporting or editorial decision-making has ties to development interests, advocacy groups or other special interests; or is seeking or receiving benefits of City development-related decisions; or holds a City Hall appointive position; or has contributed sums to political campaigns for Long Beach incumbents or challengers. LBREPORT.com isn't part of an out of town corporate cluster and no one its ownership, editorial or publishing decisionmaking has been part of the governing board of any City government body or other entity on whose policies we report. LBREPORT.com is reader and advertiser supported. You can help keep really independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.


blog comments powered by Disqus

Recommend LBREPORT.com to your Facebook friends:


Follow LBReport.com with:

Twitter

Facebook

RSS

Return To Front Page

Contact us: mail@LBReport.com



Adoptable pet of the week:




Copyright © 2020 LBReport.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use/Legal policy, click here. Privacy Policy, click here