+ Re El Dorado Park Artificial Turf Soccer Field, LBREPORT Obtains Internal Emails Showing:City Mgm't Quietly Added $850,000 Increasing Budgeted Cost To $2.35 Mil And Council Rubberstamped It In Sept. 2020 FY21 Budget
LBReport.com

News / In Depth / Follow-Up

Re El Dorado Park Artificial Turf Soccer Field, LBREPORT Obtains Internal Emails Showing:

  • (1) City Mgm't Quietly Added $850,000 Increasing Budgeted Cost To $2.35 Mil And Council Rubberstamped It In Sept. 2020 FY21 Budget
  • (2) Lowest Bids To Install Field Are Lower Than Expected BUT City Staff Doesn't Include Parks/Rec Maintenance Costs, Promised In Nov. Nov. 2019 It Would Be Included In City's FY21 Budget But It's Not Visible
  • (3) $760,000 Estimated Total Cost Increase to $3.11 Mil (Indicated City's Measure A Brochure) Remains Unexplained



  • If LBREPORT.com didn't tell you,
    who would?
    No one in LBREPORT.com's ownership, reporting or editorial decision-making has ties to development interests, advocacy groups or other special interests; or is seeking or receiving benefits of City development-related decisions; or holds a City Hall appointive position; or has contributed sums to political campaigns for Long Beach incumbents or challengers. LBREPORT.com isn't part of an out of town corporate cluster and no one its ownership, editorial or publishing decisionmaking has been part of the governing board of any City government body or other entity on whose policies we report.

    LBREPORT.com is reader and advertiser supported. Support independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.

    (Nov. 13, 2020, 9:45 a.m.) -- Internal city staff communications sought and obtained as Public Records by LBREPORT.com show:thatwthin weeks of telling the public and LB's Parks and Recreation Commission (Nov. 2019) that an El Dorado Park artificial turf soccer field would cost roughly $1.5 million, city staff realized this was untrue, as much as $900,000 short, consumed by installation of two other artificial turf fields (Admiral Kidd and Seaside Park.)

    In addition, in seeking November 21, 2019 Parks and Recreation Commission approval for the then-reprsented $1.5 million El Dorado artificial turf project, Meredith Reynolds (Manager of of Park Planning and Partnershi Bureau) wrote in an agendizing memo: "The Parks, Recreation and Marine Department will be responsible for maintenance of the artificial turf sports field. Funding for this cost has not been identified, and will be requested as part of the FY21 budget process." .

    But the El Dorado Park artificial turf maintenance cost isn't publicly listed in the City's FY 21 budget (approved by voted City Council action Sept. 8, 2020.) The ongoing cost taxpayers citywide would pay from LB's Parks/Rec budget for mainenance of the El Dorado Park artificial turf field remains publicly unknown, undiscussed and to our known publicly unbudgeted.

    In the coming weeks (tentatively expected in early December), a City Council majority will vote on whether to proceed with the project by accepting a city staff recommended bid or will say "no" to the spending item and reallocate the $2.35 million or $3.11 million or some other city staff recommended sum project cost to other City needs.

    Project opponent Ann Cantrell has publicly raised the issue (with no denial from city staff) that the artificial turf field will also require the use of more costly potable water (instead of recycled water). City staff hasn't provided taxpayer cost figures for future ongoing use of costlier potable water (for artificial turf) instead of recycled water (for natural grass.).

    • On January 28, 2020 at 12:39 p.m., Budget Manager Grace Yoon emailed Public Works Budget Services Officer Chris Kuebert:

      ...I am thinking the gap (based on [elsewhere provided numbers) if 900K not $1.5m? or did the costs/quotes go up? 1. What is the funding gap amount for the El Dorado Sports Field (artificial turf) project? "Currently, $1.5M is already budgeted in the project. PW received a quote from the contractor that completed Seaside Artificial Turf of $2.4M (construction only). PW [Public Works] is working to get the contractor down but if that does not happen the project will need to be rebid at which time costs are unknown." A few hours later, Mr. Kuebert added in an email to Ms;. Yoon: "The $2.4M is only the contractors’ quote. That doesn’t include, project management, construction management, labor compliance, etc."

    • On February 9, 2020, Ms. Yoon emailed Mr. Kuebert: Below is my email to John [Gross, Budget Manager], the red is his comment. Do you have any suggestions on how to answer and more background if asked why this needs more funding? (and what was the real behind the scenes story?)

      "With regards to the artificial turf -- I think the REAL reason is they didn’t think they would need the money so they used it for other things, but now Stacy [Mungo] does want to do it and we need the money. In terms of how this is articulated publicly -- costs have increased (which I believe is true) and more funding is needed? I’ll check with PW if they think this should be articulated differently.

      $1.5 million for the funding needed for the El Dorado Field Turf conversion project, which was recently approved and recommended to the City Council on November 21, 2019 by the Parks and Recreation Commission [color emphasis in original] and includes construction of a new artificial turf field similar to those recently completed at Admiral Kidd, Seaside, and Drake Parks. Why is more money needed -- be prepared."

    • On February 10, 2020, Mr. Kuebert emailed Ms Yoon:

      ...PW received one-time funds in FY 14 and FY 15 for artificial turf fields. The FY 15 funding was identified for Admiral Kidd Park. Total funding was split between 3 parks (AK, Seaside and El Do). There wasn’t enough remaining to complete El Do along with CD5 residents not wanting the artificial turf and lights etc. thus the park construction was put on hold. AK was completed over 3 years ago, construction costs have gone up since then. All funds were used for artificial turf field construction, not diverted to another use.

    • On Feb. 11, 2020 at 7:02 a.m., interim City Manager Tom Modica emailed Ms. Yoon:

      This project goes back several years -- it was originally awarded funding, then that funding was used to fund the other artificial turf fields as they were project ready, and now are back to finding funding to honor that original commitment and complete the project...

    • A few minutes later on Feb. 11 at 7:24 a.m., Financial Mgm't Dir. John Gross emailed Mr Modica:

      Your explanation sounds potentially (politically) problematic to me -- but as long as you are comfy with it...I asked Grace [Yoon[ to ask you so we didn’t say the wrong thing, if we are asked...

      [Scroll down for further.]







    In a November 12 email to LBREPORT.com (invited by us), City Manager Modica summed what took place:

    This project was one of the first artificial turf field projects contemplated in the City, along with three others. Through the community review process, some questions and concerns arose early on about this specific project, and at that time the budget was used to complete the other projects that were ready to proceed, with the idea that this project would be revisited in the future. We are now at that point to continue with this project as originally promised. Through the CIP process, staff recommended adding the funding necessary to complete the project and the bid for the project will be coming to the City Council shortly for their consideration.

    Right after COVID hit, we reviewed all one-time dollars for recommendations on what could or should be delayed or returned to the General Fund. Through that review we analyzed all capital projects, but ultimately I did not recommend to the Council to cancel any infrastructure projects at this time, given the high priority from the Council and community we hear of improving our infrastructure. Instead, we recommended hiring freezes, purchasing freezes, and brought the Council a list of recommended one-time set asides for non-capital projects for approval.

    No Council incumbents (including Councilwoman Mungo in her self-published "Neighborly News" emailed newsletter) disclosed or discussed the $850,000 cost increase to $2.35 million publicly prior to Council voted approval of it. On Sept. 8, 2020, the Council voted without dissent to adopt a FY21 City Budget that includes a line item for a $2.35 mil cost for the El Dorado Park artificial turf field. The spending item was publicly reported by LBREPORT.com and The Beachcomber.

  • Following Sept. 8, 2020 Council voted approval of the City's FY21 budget with inclusion of the $2.35 million El Dorado artificial turf field spending item, city staff swiftly put the item out to bid. The lowest five bids received are now public record. they are lower than city staff had expected, roughly between $1 million to under $2 million. However the bids are simply to to install the new field.

    City staff hasn't disclosed, and no Councilmember has publicly pursued, the ongoing Parks/Rec maintenance costs that Parks staff said would be included in FY21 City budget but remain publicly invisible to date.

    Sponsor

    Sponsor

    As by LBREPORT.com, Councilwoman Mungo's office and city staff have delayed [effectively stonewalled for now] timely release of public records detailing the $2.35 mil El Dorado Park artificial turf expenditure. On September 17, 2020, LBREPORT.com submitted the following request under the CA Public Records Act (CA Gov't Code section 6250 et seq.) to the City of Long Beach, seeking:

    All records (including texts, emails, memos, communications, correspondence and the like)) from July 1, 2019 to the present that concern, refer or relate to an increase of $850,000 ($1.5 mil to $2.375 mil) in the sum budgeted in FY21 for an El Dorado Park artificial turf soccer field. Said records are requested from the Department of Public Works, Department of Financial Management, Dept of Parks, Recreation and Marine and Councilwoman Stacy Mungo. The records requested from Councilwoman Mungo include all communications and/or correspondence involving constituents and/or other third parties to or from Mungo and/or her staff regarding the El Dorado Park artificial turf field (July 1, 2019 to the present.). This request includes all records on personal devices within the scope of City of San Jose v. Superior Court

    [Ed. note: The $850,000 increase is accurate, but a typo slipped into our text; the budgeted sum is $2.35 mil not $2.375 mil.]

    On Oct. 1, the City acknowledged "that responsive records exist and will be disclosed. but having received no documents as of Oct. 26, LBREPORT.com contacted Assistant City Attorney Mike Mais about the matter. Mr. Mais followed-up and indicated by email (Oct. 26) that he had reached out to the City’s PRA facilitator in the City Manager’s Office who was "informed by CD 5 (Councilwoman Mungo’s office) that they have no records responsive to your request."

    Sponsor

    Sponsor

    LBREPORT.com has invited our readers' assistance in pursuing this story. If you sent an email, text or social network communication to Councilwoman Mungo's office regarding the El Dorado Park artificial turf soccer field, pro or con, between July 1, 2019 and the present, please contact us by private message to mail@LBReport.com or phone or text us at (562) 818-7651 to let us know how best to reach you.

    Councilwoman Mungo's "Neighborly News" Oct 22 newsletter linked to but didn't mention the FY 21 budgeted cost increase from $2.35 million to a $3.11 million total cost Her Neighborly News also remained mum on the subject when it came to a Nov. 21, 2019 Parks and Rec Commission meeting. Or when it came to the Feb. 11 Budget Oversight Committee meeting she chaired. Or when it was agendized for the Feb. 18 and March 17 Council meetings.

    Instead, the Councilwoman waited until AFTER the Council voted in Sept. 2020 to budget the project at $2.35 million and city staff put it out to bid. Then Mungo's Oct. 22 "Neighborly News" includes included a link to City brochure indicating a $3.11 million total cost. Councilwoman Mungo didn't cite the $3,11 million figure during an Oct. 28 Zoom meeting she ran.

    The project, controversial from its inception, pits park protection advocates, neighborhood residents and taxpayers against city staff, some soccer advocates and Councilwoman Mungo.


    Image source: City management agendizing memo, Nov. 2019

    In September 2020, Nancy Villasenor, Capital Projects Coordinator, tells LBREPORT.com that the artificial turf field's FY21 budgeted cost increased to $2.35 million despite eliminating items from the scope to reduce cost These include eliminating "electrical conduit and panel upgrades for future sports field lighting, elimination of one goal stop (the one nearest to the parking lot remains), eliminating concrete pads for the decorative boulders, and reducing a 6’ fence to a 4’ fence. There were also plans to plant shrubs around some of the boulder clusters and that was removed as well." >


    Sponsor


    Parks/Rec staff contends replacing natural grass turf with synthetic turf on soccer fields has several benefits, including providing a playing surface that addresses field safety issues and enhances playability to meet demand" and would mean less "down time" for soccer fields. (Image below prior to project changes referenced above.)

    Artificial turf fields have already been installed at four other LB parks: Seaside Park, Admiral Kidd Park, the Drake-Chavez Park greeenbelt and Molina Park.


    Image source: City management Nov. 2019 agendizing memo

    The artificial turf sports field, similar to those installed at four other LB parks to date and planned for others, will use cork and sand fill, not "crumb rubber" (the latter have drawn public pushback and prompting a 2015 Parks/Recreation Commission majority vote to recommend cork/sand fill.) A 3-2 Parks/Rec Commission vote recommended more costly cork/sand fill over staff-recommended acrylic coated crumb rubber.)

    At the November 2019 Parks/Rec Commission meeting, Parks/Rec Commissioner Thomas asked Parks/Rec staff if there'd been any pushback or negative responses to the other artificial turf fields in use now. Parks/Rec staff said response had been all positive and hadn't heard of anything negative.

    In wrapping up the Feb. 18 Council item, Councilwoman Mungo defended her record on El Dorado Park projects and the City's record on Measure A spending.

    Councilwoman Mungo: Measure A and the promises of Measure A have consistently year after year been fulfilled. The promises that this dais, this board, made were for infrastructure and public safety. And maintaining our parks and libraries are [sic] as important as our streets.

    You will hear me at community meeting after community meeting fighting for streets, streets, streets, streets, but one of the frustrating things about street repair is it's a long planning process and we can only do so many streets a year because there are only so many asphalt vendors...

    Additionally, in relation to the extensive amount of maintenance and repairs needed at El Dorado Park, both West and East, I've consistently helped form fiends groups ["friends of" groups]. I've consistently requested the groups to maintain a list of their needs, and the items on the lists that are easily identifiable and maintained and communicated to our office have been funded. We're doing a $2 million duck pond restoration and enhancement. We've replaced and funded new tables, there were 40 tables identified throughout the park that were in disrepair. I went to one of the friends group meetings and proposed where we should place them and talked about the different strategies on how we could repair other benches throughout the park, not using Measure A funds but using Council district funds for something that was on their list, and then the $100,000 in filtration pumps that were allocated tonight with this vote that will be helpful and millions of dollars throughout the city but several of them will be for park bathrooms in El Dorado Park done this summer. So that's about $6 million in investment in just El Dorado Park East and West...

    I look forward to meeting with those groups again potentially as early as this Friday but I hope my colleagues will support moving forward on these items tonight because the community as I have heard them are in huge support...

    Councilmembers signaled at their Feb. 18 meeting that they didn't object to the total $1.5 million allocations. At that time, Councilwoman Mungo said she was comfortable with management's recommendations for allocating $4.3 million in Measure A FY19 "surplus" for a number of items (subject to some amendments from her committee.) Those items included a total of $1.5 million El Dorado Park artificial turf soccer field.

    "Measure A and the promises of Measure A have consistently year after year been fulfilled. The promises that this dais, this board, made were for infrastructure and public safety. And maintaining our parks and libraries are [sic] as important as our streets," Councilwoman Mungo said on February 18, 2020. In wrapping up the Feb. 18 Council item, Councilwoman Mungo defended her record on El Dorado Park projects and the City's record on Measure A spending.

    Councilwoman Mungo: Measure A and the promises of Measure A have consistently year after year been fulfilled. The promises that this dais, this board, made were for infrastructure and public safety. And maintaining our parks and libraries are [sic] as important as our streets.

    You will hear me at community meeting after community meeting fighting for streets, streets, streets, streets, but one of the frustrating things about street repair is it's a long planning process and we can only do so many streets a year because there are only so many asphalt vendors...

    Additionally, in relation to the extensive amount of maintenance and repairs needed at El Dorado Park, both West and East, I've consistently helped form fiends groups ["friends of" groups]. I've consistently requested the groups to maintain a list of their needs, and the items on the lists that are easily identifiable and maintained and communicated to our office have been funded. We're doing a $2 million duck pond restoration and enhancement. We've replaced and funded new tables, there were 40 tables identified throughout the park that were in disrepair. I went to one of the friends group meetings and proposed where we should place them and talked about the different strategies on how we could repair other benches throughout the park, not using Measure A funds but using Council district funds for something that was on their list, and then the $100,000 in filtration pumps that were allocated tonight with this vote that will be helpful and millions of dollars throughout the city but several of them will be for park bathrooms in El Dorado Park done this summer. So that's about $6 million in investment in just El Dorado Park East and West...

    I look forward to meeting with those groups again potentially as early as this Friday but I hope my colleagues will support moving forward on these items tonight because the community as I have heard them are in huge support...


    Nov. 13, 5:10 p.m. Summary by City Manager Tom Modica added. Other text polished or added for clarity.
    Support really independent news in Long Beach. No one in LBREPORT.com's ownership, reporting or editorial decision-making has ties to development interests, advocacy groups or other special interests; or is seeking or receiving benefits of City development-related decisions; or holds a City Hall appointive position; or has contributed sums to political campaigns for Long Beach incumbents or challengers. LBREPORT.com isn't part of an out of town corporate cluster and no one its ownership, editorial or publishing decisionmaking has been part of the governing board of any City government body or other entity on whose policies we report. LBREPORT.com is reader and advertiser supported. You can help keep really independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.


    blog comments powered by Disqus

    Recommend LBREPORT.com to your Facebook friends:


    Follow LBReport.com with:

    Twitter

    Facebook

    RSS

    Return To Front Page

    Contact us: mail@LBReport.com



  • Adoptable pet of the week:




    Copyright © 2020 LBReport.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use/Legal policy, click here. Privacy Policy, click here