LBReport.com

News

Breaking: Last Minute Redistricting Map Proposed By Political Interests Would Cut Add'l Eastside Area Out Of CD 5, Remove Eastside Voice Leader Corliss From CD 5 (Along With Previously Removed CD 5 Incumbent Mungo and Challenger Schipske), Shift Add'l Eastside Populated Area Into CD 4,

Attaches West Of Airport Cal Hts And Divided Bixby Knolls To CD 5; Would Also Give Downtown Entertainment District To CD 2's Allen With Port Going To CD 1's Zendejas



If LBREPORT.com didn't tell you,
who would?
No one in LBREPORT.com's ownership, reporting or editorial decision-making has ties to development interests, advocacy groups or other special interests; or is seeking or receiving benefits of City development-related decisions; or holds a City Hall appointive position; or has contributed sums to political campaigns for Long Beach incumbents or challengers. LBREPORT.com isn't part of an out of town corporate cluster and no one its ownership, editorial or publishing decisionmaking has been part of the governing board of any City government body or other entity on whose policies we report.

LBREPORT.com is reader and advertiser supported. Support independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.

(Nov. 10, 2021, 6:15 a.m.) -- In changes that could affect Long Beach elections for the next ten years, a last-minute map (below) advocated by political interests -- including one-term former CD 2 (Council-censured) Councilwoman Jeannine Pearce (in her Nov. 9 emailed words working "with the creators of the Equity Map, Centro Cha, the Cambodian Community, and the Black Ministers Alliance") -- would cut an additional populated area out of CD 5, remove Eastside Voice founder/leader Corliss Lee from CD5 (along with previously removed incumbent Stacy Mungo and challengers Gerrie Schiske and Michelle Dobson.)

It would give the newly proposed poulated area (NE quadrant of Plaza area north to Wardlow Rd.) to CD 4 Supernaw (safe from re-election challenge until 2024) and attaches a large area west of the Airport (Cal Hts and a divided Bixby Knolls) to CD 5.


Last minute map proposing to amend Map 2

The last minute map would also give the downtown Entertainment District to CD 2's Allen (producing two downtown area representatives and two Port representatives favored by downtown interests.) CD 1's Zendejas, whose current district is a mainly working class area with a disproportionate number of shootings, would include the westen part of the Port, a source of potential lucrative campaign contributions as she seeks re-election in 2022.

The last minute map calls itself Map 2.2.and proposes to amend "Map 2" (called Map1b in Nov. 3 Commission proceedings) which is the only map currently advanced for discussion at tonight's (Nov. 10) Redistricting Commission meeting, although the Commission can legally consider and support amendments or other maps.

Pearce's Nov. 9 email says the last minute map has "over 50 names" in support and "protects Black Neighborhoods, keeps the Cambodian Community Together, and solidifies a Latino Cultural district that includes a library and the Museum of Latin America Art."

Tonia Reyes Uranga (former CD 7 Councilwoman and spouse of CD 7 incumbent Roberto Uranga) has told LBREPORT.com that she would support the last minute map changes to Map 2 which she supported at the Nov. 3 Redistricting Commission meeting. [Map 2 and the last minute map would effectively solidify previously gerrymandered Wrigley and solidify the political base of incumbent Roberto Uranga, seeking reelection in 2022.]

[Scroll down for further.]










Some Commission members indicated they prioritized reuniting the westside and Wrigley in order to advance "Map 2" on a 9-3 vote. (As by LBREPORT.com, "Map 2" cut El Dorado Park out of CD 5 along with El Dorado Park South neighborhoods, putting them in into a northward shifted CD 4 and attaching Cal Hts and part of a split Bixby Knolls onto CD 5.


Map 2 advanced on Nov. 3

The Redistricting Commission had previously discussed at length "Map 1" which kept CD 5 basically intact...but on Nov. 3 the Commission failed to advance Map 1 on two 8-4 votes (with 9 votes needed to advance.)


Map 1 as of Oct. 27, not advanced Nov. 3

Sponsor

At tonight's (Nov. 10) meeting, the Redisricting Commission could adopt Map 2, or adopt Map 2 with the last minute proposed map changes, or vote again on Map 1, or choose other maps or make other changes. It has set a deadline for itself of tonight to advance a final map to adoption on Nov. 18.

Sponsor


The Redistricting Charter Amendment was written by the City Attorney's office, backed by Mayor Garcia and City Auditor Doud and approved by voters in 2018 ostensibly to reduce political influence in census-required balancing population in electoral districts. The Charter Amendment forbids the Redistricting Commission from taking into account the residence of any individual in drawing district lines but is required to respect communities of interest and geographically contiguous areas. Some have questioned whether Map 2 and the last minute map proposing to amend it respect these principles by letting the Airport split newly drawn CD 5..

Airport-impacted community advocate Rae Gabelich supported having more than one Airport impacted Council district touch part of the Airport, but she didn't envision splitting CD5 or attaching geographically disconnected Cal Hts and a split version of Bixby Knolls onto CD 5 to do it.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The redistricting Charter Amendment specifies in pertinent part:

Each Council district is geographically contiguous, to the extent practicable, and has a clearly defined boundary. (b)[T]the Commission shall consider the following criteria when drawing the final map, in order of priority:

(1) The geographic integrity of a neighborhood should be respected in a manner that minimizes its division.
(2) Communities of interest. The geographic integrity of a community of interest should be respected in a manner that minimizes its division. A community of interest is a contiguous population that shares common social and economic interests that should be included within a single district for purposes of its effective and fair representation;
(3) Neighborhoods and communities sharing a common language, history, culture and identity should not be divided so as to dilute their voting power;
(4) Geography and topography: Districts should respect major topographic and geographic features of the City;
(5) District boundaries should be easily identifiable and understandable by voters. Districts should be bounded by natural and artificial barriers, by street lines, and/or by City boundary lines;
(6) Districts should be geographically compact such that nearby areas of population are not bypassed for more distant population;
(7) All lines must correspond to census blocks in order to preserve the validity of data and avoid arbitrary boundaries; and
(8) Other Commission may adopt other criteria that do not conflict with the other requirements and criteria listed in this section or with state or federal law.

(c) The Commission shall not consider place of residence of any individual, including any incumbent or political candidate, in the creation of a map. (d) The Commission shall number each Council district such that, for as many residents as possible, the number of the Council district they reside in remains the same. (e) The Commission shall not draw districts for the purpose of favoring or discriminating against a political party.

Developing.

Nov. 10: Text added noting last minute map gives western part of Port to CD 1, eastern part to CD 2.


Support really independent news in Long Beach. No one in LBREPORT.com's ownership, reporting or editorial decision-making has ties to development interests, advocacy groups or other special interests; or is seeking or receiving benefits of City development-related decisions; or holds a City Hall appointive position; or has contributed sums to political campaigns for Long Beach incumbents or challengers. LBREPORT.com isn't part of an out of town corporate cluster and no one its ownership, editorial or publishing decisionmaking has been part of the governing board of any City government body or other entity on whose policies we report. LBREPORT.com is reader and advertiser supported. You can help keep really independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.


blog comments powered by Disqus

Recommend LBREPORT.com to your Facebook friends:


Follow LBReport.com with:

Twitter

Facebook

RSS

Return To Front Page

Contact us: mail@LBReport.com



Adoptable pet of the week:




Copyright © 2021 LBReport.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use/Legal policy, click here. Privacy Policy, click here