+ Did Long Beach City/Port Con Congress And Taxpayers To Fund $1.5 Billion Bridge Replacement?
LBReport.com

News / Perspective

Did Long Beach City/Port Con Congress And Taxpayers To Fund $1.5 Billion Bridge Replacement?



=-
If LBREPORT.com didn't tell you,
who would?
No one in LBREPORT.com's ownership, reporting or editorial decision-making has ties to development interests, advocacy groups or other special interests; or is seeking or receiving benefits of City development-related decisions; or holds a City Hall appointive position; or has contributed sums to political campaigns for Long Beach incumbents or challengers. LBREPORT.com isn't part of an out of town corporate cluster and no one its ownership, editorial or publishing decisionmaking has been part of the governing board of any City government body or other entity on whose policies we report.

LBREPORT.com is reader and advertiser supported. Support independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.

(Oct. 4, 2020, 7:55 a.m.) -- The City of Long Beach and the City-operated Port of Lnng Beach sought and received hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars by telling Congress and Sacramento that replacing the Gerald Desmond bridge should be a national priority.

They said the replacement was necessary to maintain the flow of goods on which the entire country depends. They said the current bridge (completed in 1968) was too low to let newer taller container ships enter Long Beach's inner harbor to unload/onload their cargo.

But that advocacy argument was untrue when made. It remains untrue today.

Tall container ships don't have to enter LB's inner harbor to unload/onload. They do so right now by using cranes fronting LB's outer harbor facing seaward. It's not a secret; it's visible and undeniable. To the extent the City and Port of Long Beach sought hundreds of millions of federal and state taxpayer dollars based on a "too-low" Desmond bridge, they offered a half truth that invited a false conclusion.

City/Port representatives didn't rely on the "too low" argument alone; they also cited other grounds. They said the bridge was "aging." But the Brooklyn Bridge (1883) and Golden Gate Bridge (1937) are also "aging." No one is talking about demolishing them.

They said the bridge relied on a "diaper" (netting below) to catch portions of roadway that fell off. But LB residents saw how the City justified a costly new Civic Center by letting the City's less than 40 year old City Hall and library deteriorate with poor maintenance.

Port of Long Beach Media Relations Manager Lee Peterson summed up other reasons for launching the bridge project.

The Gerald Desmond Bridge, completed in 1968, was not built for the job it needs to do today. There are more cargo trucks, more commuter traffic and ships are bigger. On the underside of the Desmond Bridge is some heavy-duty netting installed more than 15 years ago to catch the concrete spalls that sometimes fall from the structure.

One major reason for the replacement is to ensure that there is a reliable traffic connection from "mainland" Long Beach to Terminal Island. With 60,000 vehicles crossing the Desmond Bridge each day -- about 25 percent are cargo trucks -- is an important roadway. It’s an important connection for cargo for both the Port of Long Beach and the Port of Los Angeles.

The new bridge is 50 feet higher than the old bridge, which -- when the old bridge is dismantled -- will make it possible for large ships to access the inner harbor more readily.

Nearing the end of the 2000s (2008-2009) when the Port was working to secure funding, the biggest ships coming to Long Beach were 8,000 TEU (twenty-foot equivalent unit capacity). That’s an average size ship today. And an 8,000 TEU ship today can have trouble making it under the old bridge.

Yes, to allow the largest ships in the world to access the inner harbor would require additional improvements in the inner harbor. Once the old bridge is taken down (will happen within 18-24 months), the Port pilots can look at what will be the biggest capacity container ship that can call in the inner harbor.

Keep in mind, that the new bridge has a 100-year lifespan. So we don't know if in the future the Port will seek to make the upgrades needed to allow the biggest ships in the world to call there.

How big are ships these days? The largest ship to call at the Port of Long Beach to date came earlier this year. It was the MSC Mia, a 23,756-TEU container ship that called at Pier T in the outer harbor.

It is true, we have six container terminals, four of which are in the outer harbor, where ships do not need to transit under the bridge. Those four terminals are able to handle the largest ships, while the inner harbor terminals do indeed simply handle large ships.

[Scroll down for further.]







What maritime and cargo interests really wanted was a new bridge with more lanes, more truck cargo capacity, and they got it. And how they got it is likewise worth recalling.
Sponsor

Sponsor

Although the replacement Desmond bridge will bring increased truck traffic to the I-710 freeway, in 2010 LB's non-elected (Mayor nominated/Council approved) Harbor Commission certified an EIR for the replacement bridge that didn't analyze the bridge's cumulative impacts for the 710 freeway north of 9th St.

The bridge EIR was appealed to the City Council, but most of the high visibility appellants focused on whether it should include a dedicated bicycle lane. For his part. Then-Councilman (now Mayor) Robert Garcia pressed for inclusion of attractive bridge lighting.

The net result left those issues to the I-710 expansion project, approved by Metro's governing board [including Garcia] despite objections from a number of residents and clean air groups seeking greater pollution reductions.

LBREPORT.com stands by our statement above. Federal and state taxpayers spent hundreds of millions of dollars as part of the $1.5 billion Desmond replacement bridge's based on a premise that wasn't true when made and isn't true today.

Sponsor

Sponsor

Here's how a CalTrans/Metro/Port of Long Beach/US Dept. of Transportation release described the outcome:


Image source; CalTrans/Metro/PoLB/US DOT release

The Gerald Desmond Bridge Replacement Project has constructed a majestic bridge spanning the Port of Long Beach. With a deck rising 205 feet above the water, the new bridge will be a new icon for the Southern California coastline, replacing a bridge that has reached the end of its lifespan.The new bridge is designed for a 100-year lifespan. The sleek, cable-stayed bridge will include additional traffic lanes, a higher clearance to accommodate the large cargo ships and a dedicated bicycle path and pedestrian walkway, including scenic overlooks.The design-build project has generated about 3,000 construction-related jobs during the project.With two towers reaching 515 feet into the sky( nearly as tall as the Washington Monument), this will be the second-tallest cable-stayed bridge in the United States.The bridge provides a vital link to international and domestic shipping of goods and materials entering and leaving the major port complex.Bridge partners include the Port of Long Beach, Caltrans,LosAngeles County Metro and the U.S. Department of Transportation

Sponsor


An Oct. 2 Grand Opening was webcast on multiple government and affiliated platforms. A release described the planned event:

A flyover by vintage aircraft, a procession of clean cargo trucks and classic cars, a boat parade and more will highlight virtual, webcast ceremonies on Friday, Oct. 2, marking the opening of the iconic new bridge at the Port of Long Beach...

The broadcast event atop the 205-foot-high bridge will be led by Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia, Port Executive Director Mario Cordero and Harbor Commission President Frank Colonna...

"Together, we will be opening a new bridge to transport trade across America," said Mayor Garcia. "The Port of Long Beach has never been stronger and with this new bridge we will meet the demands for economic growth in the future."

...Officials emphasize that watching the ceremony on livestream or cable will provide the best views of all activities. The new bridge will remain closed to the public. A televised ceremony was required to avoid any potential spread of the coronavirus that may have occurred with a public gathering.

The entire broadcast will be hosted by Dr. Noel Hacegaba and Richard Cameron, deputy executive directors for the Port of Long Beach. Among the dignitaries offering their pre-taped observations and commentary are: California Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis, California Secretary of Transportation David Kim, Caltrans Director Toks Omishakin, U.S. Rep. Alan Lowenthal, state Senator Lena Gonzalez, state Assemblymember Patrick O’Donnell, Los Angeles County Supervisor Janice Hahn, Los Angeles Mayor and Metropolitan Transportation Authority Chair Eric Garcetti, ILWU Local 13 President Ramon Ponce de Leon, California Transportation Commission Chair Hilary Norton and Executive Secretary of the Los Angeles-Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades CouncilRon Miller.

...The six-lane, nearly 2-mile-long bridge will provide a seamless, efficient transition to and from the southern terminus of the 710 Freeway at the east end of this major transportation link, and an integrated connection to State Route 47 and Terminal Island at the west end. The new bridge, which will be named at a later date, also provides additional clearance for ships going to the Port of Long Beach’s inner harbor terminals...

The $1.47 billion project to replace the current Gerald Desmond Bridge will provide the Port of Long Beach and greater port complex a state-of-the-art bridge capable of meeting the needs for international cargo movement for the next 100 years. The new bridge is a joint effort of Caltrans and the Port of Long Beach, with additional funding support from the U.S. Department of Transportation and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro).


Support really independent news in Long Beach. No one in LBREPORT.com's ownership, reporting or editorial decision-making has ties to development interests, advocacy groups or other special interests; or is seeking or receiving benefits of City development-related decisions; or holds a City Hall appointive position; or has contributed sums to political campaigns for Long Beach incumbents or challengers. LBREPORT.com isn't part of an out of town corporate cluster and no one its ownership, editorial or publishing decisionmaking has been part of the governing board of any City government body or other entity on whose policies we report. LBREPORT.com is reader and advertiser supported. You can help keep really independent news in LB similar to the way people support NPR and PBS stations. We're not non-profit so it's not tax deductible but $49.95 (less than an annual dollar a week) helps keep us online.


blog comments powered by Disqus

Recommend LBREPORT.com to your Facebook friends:


Follow LBReport.com with:

Twitter

Facebook

RSS

Return To Front Page

Contact us: mail@LBReport.com



Adoptable pet of the week:




Copyright © 2020 LBReport.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use/Legal policy, click here. Privacy Policy, click here