(Feb. 4, 2015) -- As seen LIVE on LBREPORT.com, the Long Beach City Council voted 8-0 at its Feb. 3 meeting to approve allocating a previously concealed $1 million taxpayer cost to obtain a roughly $3 million "innovation grant" from Bloomberg Philanthropies for projects that will be overseen and controlled by the Mayor and City Management.
The $1 million taxpayer cost wasn't publicly disclosed when the Mayor's office and city management quietly applied for the grant, or in press releases, mass emailings and social network dispatches from the Mayor/Mgm't announcing receipt of the grant. LBREPORT.com reported (first again) the taxpayer cost using information obtained by using state freedom of information law to access City documents. LBREPORT.com's coverage detailed the $1 million cost and representations made by the Mayor's office and city management in seeking the grant [LBREPORT.com coverage here.] On January 13, 2015 Mayor Garcia cited receipt of the grant in his "State of the City" message without mentioning its $1 million taxpayer cost. City management acknowledged the cost when it agendized the Feb. 3 Council item seeking Council authority to allocate the $1 million sum. [Scroll down for further] |
The Council vote effectively enables the Mayor's office and city management to control use of the $4 million total for projects they say will first focus on unspecified "economic development." Mayor/Management's agendizing memo didn't tell the public or Councilmembers where, when, what or for whom the sums would be spent to promote "economic development"...and no Councilmembers inquired about it Assistant City Manager Tom Modica spoke briefly and indicated the grant could [paraphrase] help create efficiencies that would help the City in addressing upcoming deficits. Several Councilmembers commended Mayor Garcia for seeking the grant and echoed city management enthusiasm. City management's agendizing memo didn't state, and no Councilmember inquired, whether the $1 million in taxpayer funds expended would in fact produce innovations resulting in at least $1 million in taxpayer savings, or $1 million in new taxpayer revenue. The Council vote approved a management plan to spend $400,000 in uplands oil surplus and then consume part of $2,000,000 of FY 14 General Fund department savings to create a new "Innovation and Efficiency Initiatives revolving fund" a portion of which would be used "to support the implementatiuon of i-team solutions and meet grant requirements." [As previously reported by LBREPORT.com, on December 31, Financial Management Director Gross separately sent the Mayor and Council a memo, stating in pertinent part that it's likely there'd be no one-time FY16 oil revenue and "it also appears likely that the transfer to the General Fund could be adversely impacted by several million dollars."] [Text from city management Feb. 3, 2015 agendizing memo] FISCAL IMPACT Management's memo doesn't indicate for what uses, if any, the General Fund sums were previously planned or considered.
As previously reported by LBREPORT.com, in seeking the $3 million grant, the Mayor/management grant application told Bloomberg Philanthropies that LB's Mayor "sets citywide policy direction" when, under the City Charter, the Mayor actually has no independent legal power to set policy citywide or otherwise. The City Council sets city policy, subject to a Mayoral veto that six Councilmembers can override. As previously reported by LBREPORT.com, an organizational chart (below) submitted to Bloomberg Philanthropies in seeking the grant didn't indicate a Council role in using the grant proceeds and didn't indicate routine visible means for public and press oversight in using the grant proceeds. City management's agendizing memo tells the Council: "The Innovation Team will reside in the City Manager's Office, and an Innovation Deputy will reside in the Mayor's Office" and doesn't mention any role for the policy setting City Council.
The Mayor/management grant application told Bloomberg Philanthropies that the grant's "innovation delivery" process will be used to make "economic development" part of "everyone's job" at City Hall. It further indicated that city staff will come to "see their role as serving as a concierge to those who want to business in Long Beach." [City management has previously said it is addressing public safety by making public safety a part of everyone's job in various city departments.] The grant application doesn't indicate what type(s) of economic development will be involved or in what part(s) of the city they will (or won't) be located. (Bloomberg Philanthropies' grant application materials indicated that grantee cities were free to select issues of their choosing which could range from [cited as examples in Bloomberg materials] crime reduction, energy sustainability, economic growth, homelessness or other broad issues of local importance.) Mayor Garcia has previously said "economic development" is one of his priorities and several Councilmembers have said likewise.
Below is the text of city management's Feb. 3 agendizing memo: RECOMMENDATION:
blog comments powered by Disqus Recommend LBREPORT.com to your Facebook friends:
Follow LBReport.com with:
Contact us: mail@LBReport.com |
Hardwood Floor Specialists Call (562) 422-2800 or (714) 836-7050 |