LBReport.com

News

Survey Says: Nearly 2/3 of Californians Favor Gov. Brown's Proposed Phase-Out of Redevelopment Agencies & Enterprise Zones To Provide Money For Schools


(Jan. 31, 2011) -- The Public Policy Institute of CA, with support from the James Irvine Foundation, has released a survey indicating that nearly 2/3 of Californians favor Governor Jerry Brown's proposed budget phase-out of local Redevelopment agencies and Enterprize Zones, which the Governor says could free up state money to maintain school funding.

The survey, released Jan. 26, found that 66% of adults, 63% of likely voters, favor Gov. Brown’s proposal to phase out funding for local redevelopment agencies and eliminate enterprise zones (to redirect tax revenue to local governments for schools and other services).

Most adults (55%) disapprove of the new legislature (largely composed of incumbents)...and likely voters are more likely to be negative: 68% disapprove. The state legislature fares even worse regarding the state budget and taxes: 65% of adults and 74 percent of likely voters disapprove.

The survey indicates most Californians consider the state budget a big problem (68% adults, 83% likely voters). Significant majorities of adults oppose spending cuts in K-12 education (75%), higher education (63%), and health and human services (60%) to help reduce the state budget deficit. 71% of Californians say they are willing to increase taxes to avoid cuts to K-12 education (71%). The support drops to 59% for higher education and 57% for health and human services. By comparison, only 17% were willing to pay higher taxes to maintain current funding for prisons and corrections.

Likely voters are less willing than Californians overall to pay higher taxes to maintain funding for K-12 education (62%), higher education (51%) and health and human services (46%)...and only 14 percent would pay higher taxes to spare prisons and corrections.

Regarding solutions for a $25 billion gap between state revenue and spending, the survey says 42% of Californians prefer a mix of spending cuts and tax increases, while 36% prefer mainly cuts, 9% favor mainly tax increases, 7% apoprove of borrowing money and running a deficit.

Sizable majorities (71% adults, 73% likely voters) favor the general concept of shifting tax dollars and fees to local governments to take on the responsibility of running certain programs. The concept is favored across party lines (73% Democrats, 72% Republicans, 68% independents) and demographic groups. Most residents are confident (14% very confident, 49% somewhat confident) that local governments would be able to operate programs currently run by the state, and so are likely voters (18% very confident, 51% somewhat confident). Adults in the San Francisco Bay Area (69%) are the most likely and Los Angeles residents (59%) the least likely to express at least some confidence that their local governments would be able to take on these new responsibilities.

Additional survey results:

  • 34% name jobs and the economy as the one state leaders should focus on. Among likely voters, a record-high 35% choose the state budget as the top issue.

  • 49% of adults prefer to pay higher taxes for a government providing more services, while 46% percent prefer lower taxes and fewer services. Likely voters prefer lower taxes and fewer services 54% to 41%.

  • A slim majority favors lowering the vote threshold for local special taxes. 53% of adults (50% likely voters) say it would be a good idea to lower the 2/3 vote requirement to 55% for local special taxes. Strong majorities support strictly limiting the amount of state spending increases each year and increasing the size of the state’s rainy day fund. ABOUT THE SURVEY The PPIC Statewide Survey has provided policymakers, the media, and the general public with objective, advocacy-free information on the perceptions, opinions, and public policy preferences of California residents since 1998. This survey is part of a series that examines the social, economic, and political trends that influence public policy preferences and ballot choices. It is supported with funding from The James Irvine Foundation. Findings are based on a telephone survey of 2,004 California adult residents interviewed on landlines and cell phones from January 11–18, 2011. Interviews were conducted in English or Spanish according to respondents’ preferences. The sampling error, taking design effects from weighting into consideration, is ±3.5 percent for all adults, ±3.7 percent for the 1,365 registered voters, and ±4.2 percent for the 987 likely voters. For more information on methodology, see page 25. Mark Baldassare is president and CEO of PPIC, where he holds the Arjay and Frances Fearing Miller Chair in Public Policy. He is founder of the PPIC Statewide Survey, which he has directed since 1998. PPIC is dedicated to informing and improving public policy in California through independent, objective, nonpartisan research on major economic, social, and political issues. The institute was established in 1994 with an endowment from William R. Hewlett. As a private operating foundation, PPIC does not take or support positions on any ballot measure or on any local, state, or federal legislation, nor does it endorse, support, or oppose any political parties or candidates for public office.


    Follow LBReport.com w/

    Twitter

    RSS

    Facebook

    Return To Front Page

    Contact us: mail@LBReport.com









Mike Kowal
Mike Kowal, Realtor
Excellence @ (562) 595-1255


Carter Wood Floors
Hardwood Floor Specialists
Call (562) 422-2800 or (714) 836-7050

Ninos New Ad





blog comments powered by Disqus

Return To Front Page

Contact us: mail@LBReport.com


Copyright © 2011 LBReport.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use/Legal policy, click here. Privacy Policy, click here