Support the LB businesses you see here:

Joe Sopo
Joe Sopo, Realtor has his pulse On LB real estate. Click for info
.
Lovelace Feb 05
Wedding Entertainment Planning Is His Specialty. Bill Lovelace Delivers Personalized, Wedding Event Services. Get Info, Click Here

LBREPORT.COM CONGRATULATES FRIENDS OF LB ANIMALS, A LB HONOREE IN "MAKE A DIFFERENCE DAY"
Become A Hero To LB Animals With A $15 Membership. Learn About Us, Click Here.
Friends of LB Animals
Saving Lives Thru Spay/Neuter & Education

Discount
Pollman's Insurance, Full Service, Homegrown Firm Helping LB Area Homeowners & Drivers Save In 2005! Click for info.

Carter Wood Floor pic
Carter Wood Floors, a LB company, will restore your wood floor or install a new one. Enhance your home. Click pic.

Mike & Kathi Kowal
Mike & Kathi Kowal know Los Cerritos, Bixby Knolls, Cal Hts. and beyond. Click to learn more

NetKontent
NetKontent Digital Video Cutting Edge Services For The Internet, Broadcast and Multimedia. Click For Info


Ninos Ristorante: A delicious treasure in Bixby Knolls. Click here if you're hungry or for catering!
3853 Atlantic Ave.

Your E-Mail
Click here

  • Neighborhood Groups/Meetings
  • How To Recall a LB Elected Official
  • Crime Data
  • City Council Agendas
  • Port of LB Agendas
  • Planning Comm'n Agendas
  • E-Mail Your Council member
  • Council District Map
  • LB Parks, Rec & Marine
  • LB Schools
  • LB Airport Watchdog
  • Sacramento
  • Washington
  • References & Archives
  • Lost, Found & Adoptable Pets
  • LBReport.com

    News

    LB PTA Rep Voted As Part Of "Pedestrian Safety Advisory Committee" To Support Cutting Twelve Crossing Guard Locations...And Stands By Her Vote


    (May 13, 2005) -- LBReport.com has learned that the representative chosen by the LB Council of the PTA to occupy one of thirteen positions on a City Hall "Pedestrian Safety Advisory Committee" voted to recommend that the City Council eliminate twelve crossing guard locations proposed by city management (details below)...and says she stands by her vote.

    Linda Dixon, LB PTA's Director of Health & Safety, told LBReport.com that she attended the advisory panel's meeting at which detailed data regarding the crossing guard locations proposed for elimination were presented. She said information regarding each intersection was discussed, with roughly 20-30 minutes devoted to each intersection.

    "I agreed with the decision," Ms. Dixon told LBReport.com...and noted that the advisory body's vote was unanimous. She indicated she was named to the panel in fall 2004...and reiterated that she stands by her vote.

    City management cites the unanimous vote of the "Pedestrian Safety Advisory Committee" in support of the proposed cuts...and estimates $137,900 in savings in the first year from eliminating crossing guards at the locations indicated below. (When added to an earlier adjustment in hours, management says total annual savings would be $198,400.) City management also recommended annual review of up to 15% of LB's other crossing guard locations...in which additional locations might subsequently be recommended for cuts.

    The City Council has the independent power to accept or reject, in whole or in part, cuts proposed by city management. At its May 10 meeting, the Council voted to send the crossing guard issue to its Public Safety Committee for hearings and fact-finding. Committee chair, 9th district Councilman Val Lerch, indicated the Committee may meet on the subject as soon as May 31 [caveat: no firm date set as we post], after which the matter will return to the Council for action.

    As previously reported by LBReport.com, the "Pedestrian Safety Advisory Committee" consists of 13 non-elected members. One member represents the PTA, chosen by the PTA. Another represents LBUSD, chosen by LB's School Superintendent. Nine members representing Council districts, appointed by the City Manager. One member represents the City Traffic & Transportation Engineer, appointed by City Manager. Another represents non-public schools in the LB area, appointed by the City Manager.

    In April 2005, the Pedestrian Advisory Committee sent city management a memo, stating in pertinent part:

    By May of 2004, the [Pedestrian Safety Advisory] Committee had already taken action to deem the following intersections as no longer hazardous, as defined by Section 10.68 of the Long Beach Municipal Code, and no longer required the assignment of an adult crossing guard:

  • Magnolia Avenue and Willow Street
  • Nieto Avenue and Vista Street
  • 7th Street and Cerritos Avenue
  • Palo Verde Avenue and Willow Street
  • 7th Street and Olive Avenue

    ...The Committee’s meetings in November of 2004 and February of 2005 were consumed with the task of reviewing the re-evaluation studies conducted by City staff. The Committee carefully considered each location taking into account the re-evaluation study results, accident rates, proposed or implemented traffic safety enhancements, and their personal knowledge of the area. As a result the Committee voted to retain adult crossing guards at six locations by continuing to deem the intersections as hazardous, while voting unanimously that seven locations were no longer hazardous, as defined by the Long Beach Municipal Code, and thus no longer required the assignment of an adult crossing guard.

    The Committee respectfully requests that the City Manager forward the following twelve intersections, listed in order of Committee action, to the City Council for their consideration of no longer staffing the intersections with adult crossing guards beginning at the start of the 2005-2006 school year:

    1. Magnolia Avenue & Willow Street - This signalized intersection is located two blocks northwest of Lafayette Elementary School. Current public school service area boundaries no longer require elementary school students to cross Willow Street at the intersection. A re-evaluation study conducted in the winter of 1999 revealed that the intersection did not meet the Municipal Code warrants for the deployment of an adult crossing guard. In reviewing the study, the Committee also concluded that the construction of Robinson Academy and the expansion of classroom facilities at Lafayette Elementary School resulted in a marked decrease in the number of students crossing at the intersection. On May 13, 1999, the Committee voted unanimously to have the adult crossing guard removed from the intersection. On February 13, 2003, the Committee voted unanimously to reaffirm its earlier vote; thereby, deeming the intersection as no longer hazardous permitting the re-deployment of the adult crossing guard as necessary.

    2. Nieto Avenue and Vista Street -‘This all-way stop intersection is located immediately adjacent to Rogers Middle School and Lowell Elementary School. A re-evaluation duration study conducted in the winter of 1999 revealed that the intersection did not meet the Municipal Code warrants for the deployment of an adult crossing guard. In reviewing the study, the committee also considered the fact that there is no entrance to Lowell Elementary School at the intersection and that students should be directed to continue to the intersection of Broadway and Nieto Avenue to cross where an adult crossing guard is stationed. On May 13, 1999, the Committee voted unanimously to have the adult crossing guard removed from the intersection. On February 13, 2003, the Committee voted unanimously to reaffirm its earlier vote; thereby, deeming the intersection no longer hazardous permitting the re-deployment of the adult crossing guard as necessary.

    3. 7th Street and Cerritos - This intersection is located one block north of Franklin Middle School. There are no public elementary schools within a quarter mile of the intersection. An adult crossing guard was initially deployed at the intersection to assist students in crossing 7 Street at an uncontrolled pedestrian crossing. A traffic signal was subsequently installed at the intersection in October of 1997 to improve circulation around Franklin Middle School and to enhance pedestrian safety for students and others crossing 7th Street. A re- evaluation study conducted in the winter of 2003 revealed that the intersection does not meet the Municipal Code warrants for the deployment of an adult crossing guard. On February 13, 2003, the Committee voted unanimously to deem this intersection as no longer hazardous permitting the re-deployment of the adult crossing guard as necessary.

    4. Palo Verde Avenue and Willow Street - This signalized intersection is located at the southwest corner of Emerson Parkside Academy campus and in the general vicinity of a number of private schools. A re-evaluation study conducted in the Spring of 2003 discovered only light elementary school student crossings at the intersection both before and after school. The study ultimately revealed that the intersection does not meet the Municipal Code warrants for the deployment of an adult crossing guard. On May 15, 2003, the Committee voted unanimously to deem this intersection as no longer hazardous permitting the re- deployment of the adult crossing guard as necessary.

    5. 7th Street and Olive Avenue - This intersection is located in the vicinity of St. Anthony Elementary School, a private school, and Stevenson Elementary School, a public school. An adult crossing guard was initially deployed at the intersection to assist students in crossing 7th Street at an uncontrolled pedestrian crossing. A traffic signal was subsequently installed at the intersection in June of 2000. A re-evaluation study conducted in the fall of 2003 revealed that the intersection no longer met the Municipal Code warrants for the deployment of an adult crossing guard. On October 16, 2003, the Committee voted unanimously to deem this intersection as no longer hazardous permitting the re-deployment of the adult crossing guard as necessary.

    6. Bellflower Boulevard and Arbor Road - This signalized intersection is located on the boundary between the City of Long Beach and the City of Lakewood. There are a number of private schools located on Arbor Road west of the intersection; however, current public school service area boundaries no longer require elementary school students to cross Bellflower Boulevard in the vicinity of the intersection. A re-evaluation study conducted in the fall of 2004 revealed that the intersection does not meet the Municipal Code warrants for the deployment of an adult crossing guard. On November 16, 2004, the Committee voted unanimously to deem this intersection as no longer hazardous permitting the re-deployment of the adult crossing guard as necessary.

    7. Lakewood Boulevard and 23rd Street - This signalized intersection is located two blocks from Buffum Elementary School. A re-evaluation study was conducted in the fall of 2004. During the study period not a single student was observed crossing Lakewood Boulevard during the hours the adult crossing guard was on duty. The reevaluation study ultimately revealed that the intersection does not meet the Municipal Code warrants for the deployment of an adult crossing guard. On November 16, 2004, the Committee voted unanimously to deem this intersection as no longer hazardous permitting the re-depfoyment of the adult crossing guard as necessary.

    8. 6th Street and Daisy Avenue - This signalized intersection is located at the southeast corner of the Edison Elementary School campus. A pedestrian bridge over 6th Street is provided west of the intersection for students approaching the school from the neighborhoods to the south. Recent school service boundary changes, resulting from the opening of Chavez Elementary School, no longer require students to cross 6th Street to attend their home school. A re-evaluation study conducted in the fall of 2004 revealed that the majority of the students crossing at the intersection do so in the western crosswalk, which is protected from vehicle conflicts by the one-way street and the traffic signal. The re-evaluation study ultimately revealed that the intersection does not meet the Municipal Code warrants for the deployment of an adult crossing guard. In reviewing the study the Committee also concluded that the service boundary change would also result in a marked decrease in the number of students crossing at the intersection in subsequent school years. On November 16, 2004, the Committee voted unanimously to deem this intersection as no longer hazardous permitting the re-deployment of the adult crossing guard beginning with the 2005-2006 school year.

    9. Orange Avenue and 60th Street - This uncontrolled pedestrian crosswalk is located immediately adjacent to Gethsemane Baptist Christian School. This intersection was re-evaluated twice, once in October of 2004 and again in December of 2004. On both occasions only light student crossings were observed at the intersection. The re-evaluation studies ultimately revealed that the intersection does not meet the Municipal Code warrants for the deployment of an adult crossing guard. On February 10, 2005, the Committee voted unanimously to deem this intersection as no longer hazardous permitting the re- deployment of the adult crossing guard as necessary.

    10. Bellflower Boulevard and Spring Street - This signalized intersection has fully controlled left-turn movements and is located two blocks southeast of Carver Elementary School. During a re-evaluation study conducted in January of this year only three students were observed crossing at the intersection during the times the adult crossing guard was on duty. The re-evaluation study ultimately revealed that the intersection does not meet the Municipal Code warrants for the deployment of an adult crossing guard. On February 10, 2005, the Committee voted unanimously to deem this intersection as no longer hazardous permitting the re-deployment of the adult crossing guard as necessary.

    11. Bellflower Boulevard and Wardlow Road - This signalized intersection is located west of Burcham Elementary School and Marshall Middle School and is in the vicinity of a number of private schools and daycare facilities. The traffic signal at the intersection has been recently renovated. During a re-evaluation study conducted in January of this year, less than twenty elementary school students were observed crossing at the intersection during the times the adult crossing guard was on duty. The re-evaluation study ultimately revealed that the intersection does not meet the Municipal Code warrants for t h e deployment of an adult crossing guard. On February 10, 2005, the Committee voted unanimously to deem this intersection as no longer hazardous permitting the re-deployment of the adult crossing guard as necessary.

    12. Studebaker Road and Keynote Street - This uncontrolled pedestrian crosswalk located two blocks southwest of Keller Elementary has been re- evaluated three times in five years. Only light pedestrian crossings were observed during all three evaluations. The pedestrian crossing has not met Municipal Code warrants for the deployment of an adult crossing guard for more than five years. On February 10, 2005, the Committee voted unanimously to deem this intersection as no longer hazardous permitting the re-deployment of the adult crossing guard as necessary.

    It is the Committee’s expectation that the effected schools and Councilmembers would be notified of the intention to no longer staff the above noted intersections with an adult crossing guard before the end of May so that parent notifications can occur before the end of this school year.

  • The crossing guard program is administered and funded by LBPD within the General Fund. In the FY 04 Adopted Budget, the school crossing guard program is $1,48l,925 with 53.8 Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) positions. Crossing guards are permanent part-time positions, and 53.8 FTE translates to approximately 95 part-time guards.

    Crossing guards are paid (as of April 04) $9.00 per hour for the first four years of service, after which they receive $9.64 per hour. These permanent part-time positions are eligible for a City pension, accumulate holiday, vacation and sick time similar to full-time City employees, but do not receive City health insurance. They do receive $400 for every 174 hours worked as an in-lieu health insurance payment.

    Management says costs for the crossing guard program have been fairly stable for the past six years, increasing by only 0.5 percent, despite the addition of four additional locations during that same time period. From FY 03 to FY 04, the budget for the crossing guard program grew by $70,271 or 6.1 percent, due primarily to the negotiated salary increase granted to employees represented by the International Association of Machinists (IAM) union.

    The City Council previously directed management, in a public vote, to pursue a Three Year Deficit Reduction Plan that envisions a level of spending reductions reflected in the proposed cuts. If the Council declines to cut all or some of the crossing guards proposed for elimination, the Council and/or management would have to come up with commensurate savings elsewhere to remain faithful to the Three Year Deficit Reduction Plan.


    Return To Front Page

    Contact us: mail@LBReport.com

     

     


    Copyright © 2005 LBReport.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use/Legal policy, click here. Privacy Policy, click here